Digital Facilitation to Support Patient Access to Web-Based Primary Care Services: Scoping Literature Review
BackgroundThe use of web-based services within primary care (PC) in the National Health Service in England is increasing, with medically underserved populations being less likely to engage with web-based services than other patient groups. Digital facilitation—referring to a...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2022-07-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| Online Access: | https://www.jmir.org/2022/7/e33911 |
| _version_ | 1827858162347147264 |
|---|---|
| author | Brandi Leach Sarah Parkinson Evangelos Gkousis Gary Abel Helen Atherton John Campbell Christopher Clark Emma Cockcroft Christine Marriott Emma Pitchforth Jon Sussex |
| author_facet | Brandi Leach Sarah Parkinson Evangelos Gkousis Gary Abel Helen Atherton John Campbell Christopher Clark Emma Cockcroft Christine Marriott Emma Pitchforth Jon Sussex |
| author_sort | Brandi Leach |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundThe use of web-based services within primary care (PC) in the National Health Service in England is increasing, with medically underserved populations being less likely to engage with web-based services than other patient groups. Digital facilitation—referring to a range of processes, procedures, and personnel that seek to support patients in the uptake and use of web-based services—may be a way of addressing these challenges. However, the models and impact of digital facilitation currently in use are unclear.
ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify, characterize, and differentiate between different approaches to digital facilitation in PC; establish what is known about the effectiveness of different approaches; and understand the enablers of digital facilitation.
MethodsAdopting scoping review methodology, we searched academic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) and gray literature published between 2015 and 2020. We conducted snowball searches of reference lists of included articles and articles identified during screening as relevant to digital facilitation, but which did not meet the inclusion criteria because of article type restrictions. Titles and abstracts were independently screened by 2 reviewers. Data from eligible studies were analyzed using a narrative synthesis approach.
ResultsA total of 85 publications were included. Most (71/85, 84%) were concerned with digital facilitation approaches targeted at patients (promotion of services, training patients to improve their technical skills, or other guidance and support). Further identified approaches targeted PC staff to help patients (eg, improving staff knowledge of web-based services and enhancing their technical or communication skills). Qualitative evidence suggests that some digital facilitation may be effective in promoting the uptake and use of web-based services by patients (eg, recommendation of web-based services by practice staff and coaching). We found little evidence that providing patients with initial assistance in registering for or accessing web-based services leads to increased long-term use. Few studies have addressed the effects of digital facilitation on health care inequalities. Those that addressed this suggested that providing technical training for patients could be effective, at least in part, in reducing inequalities, although not entirely. Factors affecting the success of digital facilitation include perceptions of the usefulness of the web-based service, trust in the service, patients’ trust in providers, the capacity of PC staff, guidelines or regulations supporting facilitation efforts, and staff buy-in and motivation.
ConclusionsDigital facilitation has the potential to increase the uptake and use of web-based services by PC patients. Understanding the approaches that are most effective and cost-effective, for whom, and under what circumstances requires further research, including rigorous evaluations of longer-term impacts. As efforts continue to increase the use of web-based services in PC in England and elsewhere, we offer an early typology to inform conceptual development and evaluations.
Trial RegistrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020189019; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=189019 |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:50:51Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b76891012c704746bedf6dd461538d6e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1438-8871 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:50:51Z |
| publishDate | 2022-07-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-b76891012c704746bedf6dd461538d6e2023-08-28T22:43:38ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712022-07-01247e3391110.2196/33911Digital Facilitation to Support Patient Access to Web-Based Primary Care Services: Scoping Literature ReviewBrandi Leachhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3262-1541Sarah Parkinsonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-1842Evangelos Gkousishttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8560-8650Gary Abelhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2231-5161Helen Athertonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-1925John Campbellhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6752-3493Christopher Clarkhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7526-3038Emma Cockcrofthttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3798-9492Christine Marriotthttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8450-6222Emma Pitchforthhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9055-9331Jon Sussexhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8970-4546 BackgroundThe use of web-based services within primary care (PC) in the National Health Service in England is increasing, with medically underserved populations being less likely to engage with web-based services than other patient groups. Digital facilitation—referring to a range of processes, procedures, and personnel that seek to support patients in the uptake and use of web-based services—may be a way of addressing these challenges. However, the models and impact of digital facilitation currently in use are unclear. ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify, characterize, and differentiate between different approaches to digital facilitation in PC; establish what is known about the effectiveness of different approaches; and understand the enablers of digital facilitation. MethodsAdopting scoping review methodology, we searched academic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) and gray literature published between 2015 and 2020. We conducted snowball searches of reference lists of included articles and articles identified during screening as relevant to digital facilitation, but which did not meet the inclusion criteria because of article type restrictions. Titles and abstracts were independently screened by 2 reviewers. Data from eligible studies were analyzed using a narrative synthesis approach. ResultsA total of 85 publications were included. Most (71/85, 84%) were concerned with digital facilitation approaches targeted at patients (promotion of services, training patients to improve their technical skills, or other guidance and support). Further identified approaches targeted PC staff to help patients (eg, improving staff knowledge of web-based services and enhancing their technical or communication skills). Qualitative evidence suggests that some digital facilitation may be effective in promoting the uptake and use of web-based services by patients (eg, recommendation of web-based services by practice staff and coaching). We found little evidence that providing patients with initial assistance in registering for or accessing web-based services leads to increased long-term use. Few studies have addressed the effects of digital facilitation on health care inequalities. Those that addressed this suggested that providing technical training for patients could be effective, at least in part, in reducing inequalities, although not entirely. Factors affecting the success of digital facilitation include perceptions of the usefulness of the web-based service, trust in the service, patients’ trust in providers, the capacity of PC staff, guidelines or regulations supporting facilitation efforts, and staff buy-in and motivation. ConclusionsDigital facilitation has the potential to increase the uptake and use of web-based services by PC patients. Understanding the approaches that are most effective and cost-effective, for whom, and under what circumstances requires further research, including rigorous evaluations of longer-term impacts. As efforts continue to increase the use of web-based services in PC in England and elsewhere, we offer an early typology to inform conceptual development and evaluations. Trial RegistrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020189019; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=189019https://www.jmir.org/2022/7/e33911 |
| spellingShingle | Brandi Leach Sarah Parkinson Evangelos Gkousis Gary Abel Helen Atherton John Campbell Christopher Clark Emma Cockcroft Christine Marriott Emma Pitchforth Jon Sussex Digital Facilitation to Support Patient Access to Web-Based Primary Care Services: Scoping Literature Review Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| title | Digital Facilitation to Support Patient Access to Web-Based Primary Care Services: Scoping Literature Review |
| title_full | Digital Facilitation to Support Patient Access to Web-Based Primary Care Services: Scoping Literature Review |
| title_fullStr | Digital Facilitation to Support Patient Access to Web-Based Primary Care Services: Scoping Literature Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Digital Facilitation to Support Patient Access to Web-Based Primary Care Services: Scoping Literature Review |
| title_short | Digital Facilitation to Support Patient Access to Web-Based Primary Care Services: Scoping Literature Review |
| title_sort | digital facilitation to support patient access to web based primary care services scoping literature review |
| url | https://www.jmir.org/2022/7/e33911 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT brandileach digitalfacilitationtosupportpatientaccesstowebbasedprimarycareservicesscopingliteraturereview AT sarahparkinson digitalfacilitationtosupportpatientaccesstowebbasedprimarycareservicesscopingliteraturereview AT evangelosgkousis digitalfacilitationtosupportpatientaccesstowebbasedprimarycareservicesscopingliteraturereview AT garyabel digitalfacilitationtosupportpatientaccesstowebbasedprimarycareservicesscopingliteraturereview AT helenatherton digitalfacilitationtosupportpatientaccesstowebbasedprimarycareservicesscopingliteraturereview AT johncampbell digitalfacilitationtosupportpatientaccesstowebbasedprimarycareservicesscopingliteraturereview AT christopherclark digitalfacilitationtosupportpatientaccesstowebbasedprimarycareservicesscopingliteraturereview AT emmacockcroft digitalfacilitationtosupportpatientaccesstowebbasedprimarycareservicesscopingliteraturereview AT christinemarriott digitalfacilitationtosupportpatientaccesstowebbasedprimarycareservicesscopingliteraturereview AT emmapitchforth digitalfacilitationtosupportpatientaccesstowebbasedprimarycareservicesscopingliteraturereview AT jonsussex digitalfacilitationtosupportpatientaccesstowebbasedprimarycareservicesscopingliteraturereview |