Testing of IQTM 200 automated urine analyzer analytical performances in comparison with manual techniques

Automation is necessary in laboratory systems. It enables reduction of time required for sample analysis, as well as standardization of methods. However, automation of urine control in laboratories is much less common than in hematological analyses. Not long ago, the necessary automated systems for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Čabarkapa Velibor, Đerić Mirjana, Stošić Zoran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society of Medical Biochemists of Serbia, Belgrade 2009-01-01
Series:Journal of Medical Biochemistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/1452-8258/2009/1452-82580902122C.pdf
Description
Summary:Automation is necessary in laboratory systems. It enables reduction of time required for sample analysis, as well as standardization of methods. However, automation of urine control in laboratories is much less common than in hematological analyses. Not long ago, the necessary automated systems for urine analysis have also been developed. The objective of this study is a comparison of the IQTM 200 automated system for urine analyzing with standardized manual urine analyzing techniques. Comparative analysis of 300 samples was performed by the IQTM 200 system and by the standardized methods of manual microscopy and chemical urine analysis. The results acquired point to very high compatibility between urine analyses by manual techniques and by the automated system IQTM 200, and in some analyses IQTM 200 showed higher sensitivity. It can be concluded, with the aim of standardization and shortening of time required for urine analysis, that utilization of automated urine analyzing systems is recommendable, especially in institutions with a large number of daily analyses. This is also supported by the fact that operation procedure on automated systems is much more simple in comparison to manual techniques.
ISSN:1452-8258
1452-8266