Bilateral multiple recession coverage with platelet-rich fibrin in comparison with amniotic membrane

Various plastic procedures are done to enhance esthetics, relieve hypersensitivity or even prevent root caries. The most predictable plastic procedure is the coronally advanced flap procedure, with subepithelial connective tissue. Owing to the second surgical donor site and difficulty in procuring a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sonia S Shetty, Anirban Chatterjee, Somik Bose
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2014;volume=18;issue=1;spage=102;epage=106;aulast=Shetty
_version_ 1818427265402273792
author Sonia S Shetty
Anirban Chatterjee
Somik Bose
author_facet Sonia S Shetty
Anirban Chatterjee
Somik Bose
author_sort Sonia S Shetty
collection DOAJ
description Various plastic procedures are done to enhance esthetics, relieve hypersensitivity or even prevent root caries. The most predictable plastic procedure is the coronally advanced flap procedure, with subepithelial connective tissue. Owing to the second surgical donor site and difficulty in procuring a sufficient graft in multiple recessions, various alternative additive membranes are used. This is a case report, the first of its kind, wherein a bilaterally occurring multiple Millers class I recession was managed by using Platelet-rich Fibrin (PrF) and amniotic membrane, in a 40-year-old male, who presented to the Department of Periodontics. He complained of hypersensitivity in relation to the upper right and left back region, a bilateral Millers class I recession in relation to 15, 16, and 25, 26 of 3 mm each. Both the recessions were planned for root coverage with coronally advanced flap and additive membrane. The sites were randomly assigned for the use of platelet-rich fibrin and an aminotic membrane. The clinical outcome of the surgical procedure accounted for 100% root coverage, an enhanced gingival biotype, with both the membranes. Furthermore, the results were stable even after seven months in the amniotic membrane-treated site. Hence, the use of amniotic membrane as a novel approach to root coverage is more advantageous than PrF owing to the laboratory preparation of the autologous biomaterial.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T14:42:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b77ca9cb74f24f6e86ab4758c1473088
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-124X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T14:42:59Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
spelling doaj.art-b77ca9cb74f24f6e86ab4758c14730882022-12-21T22:57:22ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology0972-124X2014-01-0118110210610.4103/0972-124X.128261Bilateral multiple recession coverage with platelet-rich fibrin in comparison with amniotic membraneSonia S ShettyAnirban ChatterjeeSomik BoseVarious plastic procedures are done to enhance esthetics, relieve hypersensitivity or even prevent root caries. The most predictable plastic procedure is the coronally advanced flap procedure, with subepithelial connective tissue. Owing to the second surgical donor site and difficulty in procuring a sufficient graft in multiple recessions, various alternative additive membranes are used. This is a case report, the first of its kind, wherein a bilaterally occurring multiple Millers class I recession was managed by using Platelet-rich Fibrin (PrF) and amniotic membrane, in a 40-year-old male, who presented to the Department of Periodontics. He complained of hypersensitivity in relation to the upper right and left back region, a bilateral Millers class I recession in relation to 15, 16, and 25, 26 of 3 mm each. Both the recessions were planned for root coverage with coronally advanced flap and additive membrane. The sites were randomly assigned for the use of platelet-rich fibrin and an aminotic membrane. The clinical outcome of the surgical procedure accounted for 100% root coverage, an enhanced gingival biotype, with both the membranes. Furthermore, the results were stable even after seven months in the amniotic membrane-treated site. Hence, the use of amniotic membrane as a novel approach to root coverage is more advantageous than PrF owing to the laboratory preparation of the autologous biomaterial.http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2014;volume=18;issue=1;spage=102;epage=106;aulast=ShettyAmniotic membranebilateralcoronally advanced flaphypersensitivityplatelet-rich fibrinrecession
spellingShingle Sonia S Shetty
Anirban Chatterjee
Somik Bose
Bilateral multiple recession coverage with platelet-rich fibrin in comparison with amniotic membrane
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Amniotic membrane
bilateral
coronally advanced flap
hypersensitivity
platelet-rich fibrin
recession
title Bilateral multiple recession coverage with platelet-rich fibrin in comparison with amniotic membrane
title_full Bilateral multiple recession coverage with platelet-rich fibrin in comparison with amniotic membrane
title_fullStr Bilateral multiple recession coverage with platelet-rich fibrin in comparison with amniotic membrane
title_full_unstemmed Bilateral multiple recession coverage with platelet-rich fibrin in comparison with amniotic membrane
title_short Bilateral multiple recession coverage with platelet-rich fibrin in comparison with amniotic membrane
title_sort bilateral multiple recession coverage with platelet rich fibrin in comparison with amniotic membrane
topic Amniotic membrane
bilateral
coronally advanced flap
hypersensitivity
platelet-rich fibrin
recession
url http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2014;volume=18;issue=1;spage=102;epage=106;aulast=Shetty
work_keys_str_mv AT soniasshetty bilateralmultiplerecessioncoveragewithplateletrichfibrinincomparisonwithamnioticmembrane
AT anirbanchatterjee bilateralmultiplerecessioncoveragewithplateletrichfibrinincomparisonwithamnioticmembrane
AT somikbose bilateralmultiplerecessioncoveragewithplateletrichfibrinincomparisonwithamnioticmembrane