ON THE GEOELECTRICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE KURIL‐KAMCHATKA AND BERING SEA SEGMENTS OF THE PACIFIC TRANSITION ZONE

The data from the regional magnetotelluric sounding profiles Severny and Yuzhny (northern and southern, respectively) was analyzed and interpreted. The profiles were located on several sites of the eastern coast of Kam‐ chatka, which differ in tectonic structure and geodynamic conditions. The southe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu. F. Moroz, O. M. Samoilova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Institute of the Earth's crust 2018-07-01
Series:Геодинамика и тектонофизика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.gt-crust.ru/jour/article/view/587
_version_ 1826557604688560128
author Yu. F. Moroz
O. M. Samoilova
author_facet Yu. F. Moroz
O. M. Samoilova
author_sort Yu. F. Moroz
collection DOAJ
description The data from the regional magnetotelluric sounding profiles Severny and Yuzhny (northern and southern, respectively) was analyzed and interpreted. The profiles were located on several sites of the eastern coast of Kam‐ chatka, which differ in tectonic structure and geodynamic conditions. The southeastern region covers the Kuril‐ Kamchatka segment of the Pacific transition zone, which corresponds to the active continental margin, while the northeastern region includes the passive continental margin. Geoelectrical sections were obtained along the regional profiles to a depth of about 80 km. The identified anomalies of electrical conductivity were compared with the data obtained by other geophysical methods (specifically, the data on gravity and anomalous magnetic fields). The com‐ parative analysis of the geoelectrical sections shows that electrical conductivity changes gradually in the northeastern region, while the structure of the southeastern region is represented by blocks differing in geoelectrical properties. The conducting horizon of the lithosphere lies at different depths in different parts of East Kamchatka. The south‐ eastern section shows the roof of the lithospheric layer closest to the land surface.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T20:29:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b77fbba11024415ab03d940c13c00e27
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2078-502X
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-14T08:31:15Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Institute of the Earth's crust
record_format Article
series Геодинамика и тектонофизика
spelling doaj.art-b77fbba11024415ab03d940c13c00e272025-03-02T13:02:47ZengRussian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Institute of the Earth's crustГеодинамика и тектонофизика2078-502X2018-07-019248950110.5800/GT-2018-9-2-0357354ON THE GEOELECTRICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE KURIL‐KAMCHATKA AND BERING SEA SEGMENTS OF THE PACIFIC TRANSITION ZONEYu. F. Moroz0O. M. Samoilova1Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, Far East Branch of RAS; Geological Institute, Siberian Branch of RASInstitute of Volcanology and Seismology, Far East Branch of RASThe data from the regional magnetotelluric sounding profiles Severny and Yuzhny (northern and southern, respectively) was analyzed and interpreted. The profiles were located on several sites of the eastern coast of Kam‐ chatka, which differ in tectonic structure and geodynamic conditions. The southeastern region covers the Kuril‐ Kamchatka segment of the Pacific transition zone, which corresponds to the active continental margin, while the northeastern region includes the passive continental margin. Geoelectrical sections were obtained along the regional profiles to a depth of about 80 km. The identified anomalies of electrical conductivity were compared with the data obtained by other geophysical methods (specifically, the data on gravity and anomalous magnetic fields). The com‐ parative analysis of the geoelectrical sections shows that electrical conductivity changes gradually in the northeastern region, while the structure of the southeastern region is represented by blocks differing in geoelectrical properties. The conducting horizon of the lithosphere lies at different depths in different parts of East Kamchatka. The south‐ eastern section shows the roof of the lithospheric layer closest to the land surface.https://www.gt-crust.ru/jour/article/view/587magnetotelluric soundingregional profiledeep geoelectrical modellithospheric conductive layerpacific transition zonenumerical simulation
spellingShingle Yu. F. Moroz
O. M. Samoilova
ON THE GEOELECTRICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE KURIL‐KAMCHATKA AND BERING SEA SEGMENTS OF THE PACIFIC TRANSITION ZONE
Геодинамика и тектонофизика
magnetotelluric sounding
regional profile
deep geoelectrical model
lithospheric conductive layer
pacific transition zone
numerical simulation
title ON THE GEOELECTRICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE KURIL‐KAMCHATKA AND BERING SEA SEGMENTS OF THE PACIFIC TRANSITION ZONE
title_full ON THE GEOELECTRICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE KURIL‐KAMCHATKA AND BERING SEA SEGMENTS OF THE PACIFIC TRANSITION ZONE
title_fullStr ON THE GEOELECTRICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE KURIL‐KAMCHATKA AND BERING SEA SEGMENTS OF THE PACIFIC TRANSITION ZONE
title_full_unstemmed ON THE GEOELECTRICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE KURIL‐KAMCHATKA AND BERING SEA SEGMENTS OF THE PACIFIC TRANSITION ZONE
title_short ON THE GEOELECTRICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE KURIL‐KAMCHATKA AND BERING SEA SEGMENTS OF THE PACIFIC TRANSITION ZONE
title_sort on the geoelectrical difference between the kuril kamchatka and bering sea segments of the pacific transition zone
topic magnetotelluric sounding
regional profile
deep geoelectrical model
lithospheric conductive layer
pacific transition zone
numerical simulation
url https://www.gt-crust.ru/jour/article/view/587
work_keys_str_mv AT yufmoroz onthegeoelectricaldifferencebetweenthekurilkamchatkaandberingseasegmentsofthepacifictransitionzone
AT omsamoilova onthegeoelectricaldifferencebetweenthekurilkamchatkaandberingseasegmentsofthepacifictransitionzone