Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort study
Abstract Background The timing of nutritional assessment may be important to treat cancer patients and predict their prognosis. This study examined whether Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE scores were associated with survival among gastric cancer patients who un...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-11-01
|
Series: | BMC Gastroenterology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02515-3 |
_version_ | 1798016842349936640 |
---|---|
author | Jae Won Cho Jiyoung Youn Eun Mee Kim Min-Gew Choi Jung Eun Lee |
author_facet | Jae Won Cho Jiyoung Youn Eun Mee Kim Min-Gew Choi Jung Eun Lee |
author_sort | Jae Won Cho |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background The timing of nutritional assessment may be important to treat cancer patients and predict their prognosis. This study examined whether Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE scores were associated with survival among gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery and chemotherapy and whether the timing of the assessment after surgery mattered. Methods A total of 952 gastric cancer patients (622 men and 330 women) were included in this retrospective cohort study. The PG-SGA and NUTRISCORE scores were calculated at 1 month (n = 952), 2 months (n = 657), and 3 months (n = 294) after surgery. Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The PG-SGA scores assessed at 1 month after gastrectomy were not associated with survival. However, high PG-SGA scores at 2 months after gastrectomy (median = 65 days) were associated with an increased risk of mortality; the HR (95% CI) was 2.26 (1.22–4.21) for 9–11 vs. ≤ 5 of PG-SGA scores. When we included patients who received all three consecutive consultations, HR (95% CI) was 2.56 (1.02–6.42) for ≥ 9 (malnutrition) vs. ≤ 8 of PG-SGA scores assessed at 3 months after surgery (median days = 98 days). Likewise, high NUTRISCORE scores assessed at the 3-month follow-up were associated with higher mortality; the HR (95% CI) was 3.84 (1.18–12.55) for ≥ 7 vs. ≤ 4 of NUTRISCORE scores. Conclusion Malnutrition assessed with the PG-SGA and NUTRISCORE at 2 to 3 months after gastrectomy was associated with poor survival among gastric cancer patients. Our findings suggest that the timing of the nutritional evaluation may be important in identifying and treating malnutrition related to gastric cancer prognosis. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T15:57:09Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b7808c2d28464707851ab5e02dbc6095 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-230X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T15:57:09Z |
publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Gastroenterology |
spelling | doaj.art-b7808c2d28464707851ab5e02dbc60952022-12-22T04:15:08ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2022-11-0122111210.1186/s12876-022-02515-3Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort studyJae Won Cho0Jiyoung Youn1Eun Mee Kim2Min-Gew Choi3Jung Eun Lee4Department of Dietetic, Samsung Medical CenterDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National UniversityDepartment of Dietetic, Samsung Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National UniversityAbstract Background The timing of nutritional assessment may be important to treat cancer patients and predict their prognosis. This study examined whether Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE scores were associated with survival among gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery and chemotherapy and whether the timing of the assessment after surgery mattered. Methods A total of 952 gastric cancer patients (622 men and 330 women) were included in this retrospective cohort study. The PG-SGA and NUTRISCORE scores were calculated at 1 month (n = 952), 2 months (n = 657), and 3 months (n = 294) after surgery. Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The PG-SGA scores assessed at 1 month after gastrectomy were not associated with survival. However, high PG-SGA scores at 2 months after gastrectomy (median = 65 days) were associated with an increased risk of mortality; the HR (95% CI) was 2.26 (1.22–4.21) for 9–11 vs. ≤ 5 of PG-SGA scores. When we included patients who received all three consecutive consultations, HR (95% CI) was 2.56 (1.02–6.42) for ≥ 9 (malnutrition) vs. ≤ 8 of PG-SGA scores assessed at 3 months after surgery (median days = 98 days). Likewise, high NUTRISCORE scores assessed at the 3-month follow-up were associated with higher mortality; the HR (95% CI) was 3.84 (1.18–12.55) for ≥ 7 vs. ≤ 4 of NUTRISCORE scores. Conclusion Malnutrition assessed with the PG-SGA and NUTRISCORE at 2 to 3 months after gastrectomy was associated with poor survival among gastric cancer patients. Our findings suggest that the timing of the nutritional evaluation may be important in identifying and treating malnutrition related to gastric cancer prognosis.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02515-3Gastric cancerGastrectomyMalnutritionPG-SGANUTRISCORESurvival |
spellingShingle | Jae Won Cho Jiyoung Youn Eun Mee Kim Min-Gew Choi Jung Eun Lee Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort study BMC Gastroenterology Gastric cancer Gastrectomy Malnutrition PG-SGA NUTRISCORE Survival |
title | Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | associations of patient generated subjective global assessment pg sga and nutriscore with survival in gastric cancer patients timing matters a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Gastric cancer Gastrectomy Malnutrition PG-SGA NUTRISCORE Survival |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02515-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaewoncho associationsofpatientgeneratedsubjectiveglobalassessmentpgsgaandnutriscorewithsurvivalingastriccancerpatientstimingmattersaretrospectivecohortstudy AT jiyoungyoun associationsofpatientgeneratedsubjectiveglobalassessmentpgsgaandnutriscorewithsurvivalingastriccancerpatientstimingmattersaretrospectivecohortstudy AT eunmeekim associationsofpatientgeneratedsubjectiveglobalassessmentpgsgaandnutriscorewithsurvivalingastriccancerpatientstimingmattersaretrospectivecohortstudy AT mingewchoi associationsofpatientgeneratedsubjectiveglobalassessmentpgsgaandnutriscorewithsurvivalingastriccancerpatientstimingmattersaretrospectivecohortstudy AT jungeunlee associationsofpatientgeneratedsubjectiveglobalassessmentpgsgaandnutriscorewithsurvivalingastriccancerpatientstimingmattersaretrospectivecohortstudy |