Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background The timing of nutritional assessment may be important to treat cancer patients and predict their prognosis. This study examined whether Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE scores were associated with survival among gastric cancer patients who un...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jae Won Cho, Jiyoung Youn, Eun Mee Kim, Min-Gew Choi, Jung Eun Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-11-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02515-3
_version_ 1798016842349936640
author Jae Won Cho
Jiyoung Youn
Eun Mee Kim
Min-Gew Choi
Jung Eun Lee
author_facet Jae Won Cho
Jiyoung Youn
Eun Mee Kim
Min-Gew Choi
Jung Eun Lee
author_sort Jae Won Cho
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The timing of nutritional assessment may be important to treat cancer patients and predict their prognosis. This study examined whether Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE scores were associated with survival among gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery and chemotherapy and whether the timing of the assessment after surgery mattered. Methods A total of 952 gastric cancer patients (622 men and 330 women) were included in this retrospective cohort study. The PG-SGA and NUTRISCORE scores were calculated at 1 month (n = 952), 2 months (n = 657), and 3 months (n = 294) after surgery. Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The PG-SGA scores assessed at 1 month after gastrectomy were not associated with survival. However, high PG-SGA scores at 2 months after gastrectomy (median = 65 days) were associated with an increased risk of mortality; the HR (95% CI) was 2.26 (1.22–4.21) for 9–11 vs. ≤ 5 of PG-SGA scores. When we included patients who received all three consecutive consultations, HR (95% CI) was 2.56 (1.02–6.42) for ≥ 9 (malnutrition) vs. ≤ 8 of PG-SGA scores assessed at 3 months after surgery (median days = 98 days). Likewise, high NUTRISCORE scores assessed at the 3-month follow-up were associated with higher mortality; the HR (95% CI) was 3.84 (1.18–12.55) for ≥ 7 vs. ≤ 4 of NUTRISCORE scores. Conclusion Malnutrition assessed with the PG-SGA and NUTRISCORE at 2 to 3 months after gastrectomy was associated with poor survival among gastric cancer patients. Our findings suggest that the timing of the nutritional evaluation may be important in identifying and treating malnutrition related to gastric cancer prognosis.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T15:57:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b7808c2d28464707851ab5e02dbc6095
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-230X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T15:57:09Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Gastroenterology
spelling doaj.art-b7808c2d28464707851ab5e02dbc60952022-12-22T04:15:08ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2022-11-0122111210.1186/s12876-022-02515-3Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort studyJae Won Cho0Jiyoung Youn1Eun Mee Kim2Min-Gew Choi3Jung Eun Lee4Department of Dietetic, Samsung Medical CenterDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National UniversityDepartment of Dietetic, Samsung Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National UniversityAbstract Background The timing of nutritional assessment may be important to treat cancer patients and predict their prognosis. This study examined whether Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE scores were associated with survival among gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery and chemotherapy and whether the timing of the assessment after surgery mattered. Methods A total of 952 gastric cancer patients (622 men and 330 women) were included in this retrospective cohort study. The PG-SGA and NUTRISCORE scores were calculated at 1 month (n = 952), 2 months (n = 657), and 3 months (n = 294) after surgery. Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The PG-SGA scores assessed at 1 month after gastrectomy were not associated with survival. However, high PG-SGA scores at 2 months after gastrectomy (median = 65 days) were associated with an increased risk of mortality; the HR (95% CI) was 2.26 (1.22–4.21) for 9–11 vs. ≤ 5 of PG-SGA scores. When we included patients who received all three consecutive consultations, HR (95% CI) was 2.56 (1.02–6.42) for ≥ 9 (malnutrition) vs. ≤ 8 of PG-SGA scores assessed at 3 months after surgery (median days = 98 days). Likewise, high NUTRISCORE scores assessed at the 3-month follow-up were associated with higher mortality; the HR (95% CI) was 3.84 (1.18–12.55) for ≥ 7 vs. ≤ 4 of NUTRISCORE scores. Conclusion Malnutrition assessed with the PG-SGA and NUTRISCORE at 2 to 3 months after gastrectomy was associated with poor survival among gastric cancer patients. Our findings suggest that the timing of the nutritional evaluation may be important in identifying and treating malnutrition related to gastric cancer prognosis.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02515-3Gastric cancerGastrectomyMalnutritionPG-SGANUTRISCORESurvival
spellingShingle Jae Won Cho
Jiyoung Youn
Eun Mee Kim
Min-Gew Choi
Jung Eun Lee
Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort study
BMC Gastroenterology
Gastric cancer
Gastrectomy
Malnutrition
PG-SGA
NUTRISCORE
Survival
title Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort study
title_full Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort study
title_short Associations of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and NUTRISCORE with survival in gastric cancer patients: timing matters, a retrospective cohort study
title_sort associations of patient generated subjective global assessment pg sga and nutriscore with survival in gastric cancer patients timing matters a retrospective cohort study
topic Gastric cancer
Gastrectomy
Malnutrition
PG-SGA
NUTRISCORE
Survival
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02515-3
work_keys_str_mv AT jaewoncho associationsofpatientgeneratedsubjectiveglobalassessmentpgsgaandnutriscorewithsurvivalingastriccancerpatientstimingmattersaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jiyoungyoun associationsofpatientgeneratedsubjectiveglobalassessmentpgsgaandnutriscorewithsurvivalingastriccancerpatientstimingmattersaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT eunmeekim associationsofpatientgeneratedsubjectiveglobalassessmentpgsgaandnutriscorewithsurvivalingastriccancerpatientstimingmattersaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mingewchoi associationsofpatientgeneratedsubjectiveglobalassessmentpgsgaandnutriscorewithsurvivalingastriccancerpatientstimingmattersaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jungeunlee associationsofpatientgeneratedsubjectiveglobalassessmentpgsgaandnutriscorewithsurvivalingastriccancerpatientstimingmattersaretrospectivecohortstudy