Providers’ Experience of Abortion Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review
BackgroundDespite being one of the most common gynecological procedures in the world, abortion care remains highly stigmatized. Internationally, providers have noted negative impacts related to their involvement in the services, and abortion care has been described as “dirty...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2022-02-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Research Protocols |
| Online Access: | https://www.researchprotocols.org/2022/2/e35481 |
| _version_ | 1797735354536558592 |
|---|---|
| author | B Dempsey S Callaghan M F Higgins |
| author_facet | B Dempsey S Callaghan M F Higgins |
| author_sort | B Dempsey |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundDespite being one of the most common gynecological procedures in the world, abortion care remains highly stigmatized. Internationally, providers have noted negative impacts related to their involvement in the services, and abortion care has been described as “dirty work.” Though much of the existing research focuses on the challenges of providing, many have also highlighted the positive aspects of working in abortion care. Despite the steadily increasing interest in this area over the past decade, however, no one has sought to systematically review the literature to date.
ObjectiveThe aim of this review is to systematically explore published studies on the experiences of abortion care providers to create a narrative review on the lived experience of providing abortion care, reflecting on what is already known and what areas require further exploration.
MethodsThis review will be conducted according to the framework outlined by Levac et al, which expanded on the popular Arksey and O’Malley framework. We will systematically search for peer-reviewed articles in 6 electronic databases: CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Web of Science. Following a pilot exercise, we devised a search strategy to identify relevant studies. In this protocol, we outline how citations will be assessed for eligibility and what information will be extracted from the included articles. We also highlight how this information will be combined in the review.
ResultsAs of December 2021, at the time of writing, we have searched for articles in the electronic databases and identified 6624 unique citations. We intend to fully assess these citations for eligibility by the end of January 2022, chart and analyze data from the eligible citations by the end of March 2022, and submit a journal article for peer review by late spring 2022.
ConclusionsThe findings of this review will provide a comprehensive overview on the known experiences of providing abortion care. We also anticipate that the findings will identify aspects of care and experiences that are not reflected in the available literature. We will disseminate the results via a publication in a peer-reviewed academic journal and by presenting the findings at conferences in the areas of abortion care, obstetrics, and midwifery. As this review is a secondary analysis of published articles, ethical approval was not required.
International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/35481 |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:57:49Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b78b04a9e86b41ceb9780f178173924c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1929-0748 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:57:49Z |
| publishDate | 2022-02-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Research Protocols |
| spelling | doaj.art-b78b04a9e86b41ceb9780f178173924c2023-08-28T20:42:23ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Research Protocols1929-07482022-02-01112e3548110.2196/35481Providers’ Experience of Abortion Care: Protocol for a Scoping ReviewB Dempseyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7659-7398S Callaghanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3085-4897M F Higginshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6469-5169 BackgroundDespite being one of the most common gynecological procedures in the world, abortion care remains highly stigmatized. Internationally, providers have noted negative impacts related to their involvement in the services, and abortion care has been described as “dirty work.” Though much of the existing research focuses on the challenges of providing, many have also highlighted the positive aspects of working in abortion care. Despite the steadily increasing interest in this area over the past decade, however, no one has sought to systematically review the literature to date. ObjectiveThe aim of this review is to systematically explore published studies on the experiences of abortion care providers to create a narrative review on the lived experience of providing abortion care, reflecting on what is already known and what areas require further exploration. MethodsThis review will be conducted according to the framework outlined by Levac et al, which expanded on the popular Arksey and O’Malley framework. We will systematically search for peer-reviewed articles in 6 electronic databases: CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Web of Science. Following a pilot exercise, we devised a search strategy to identify relevant studies. In this protocol, we outline how citations will be assessed for eligibility and what information will be extracted from the included articles. We also highlight how this information will be combined in the review. ResultsAs of December 2021, at the time of writing, we have searched for articles in the electronic databases and identified 6624 unique citations. We intend to fully assess these citations for eligibility by the end of January 2022, chart and analyze data from the eligible citations by the end of March 2022, and submit a journal article for peer review by late spring 2022. ConclusionsThe findings of this review will provide a comprehensive overview on the known experiences of providing abortion care. We also anticipate that the findings will identify aspects of care and experiences that are not reflected in the available literature. We will disseminate the results via a publication in a peer-reviewed academic journal and by presenting the findings at conferences in the areas of abortion care, obstetrics, and midwifery. As this review is a secondary analysis of published articles, ethical approval was not required. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/35481https://www.researchprotocols.org/2022/2/e35481 |
| spellingShingle | B Dempsey S Callaghan M F Higgins Providers’ Experience of Abortion Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review JMIR Research Protocols |
| title | Providers’ Experience of Abortion Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review |
| title_full | Providers’ Experience of Abortion Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review |
| title_fullStr | Providers’ Experience of Abortion Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Providers’ Experience of Abortion Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review |
| title_short | Providers’ Experience of Abortion Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review |
| title_sort | providers experience of abortion care protocol for a scoping review |
| url | https://www.researchprotocols.org/2022/2/e35481 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bdempsey providersexperienceofabortioncareprotocolforascopingreview AT scallaghan providersexperienceofabortioncareprotocolforascopingreview AT mfhiggins providersexperienceofabortioncareprotocolforascopingreview |