Critical action to redress systemic oppression: a person-centered approach

IntroductionIn 2020, public outcry against police brutality prompted many social media users to post black squares and use the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter (BLM). Many of the people who posted these squares were engaging in performative action in the sense that they failed to engage with BLM’s history...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristin Vierra, Aldo Barrita, Gloria Wong-Padoongpatt, Rachael D. Robnett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1189598/full
_version_ 1797794655652282368
author Kristin Vierra
Aldo Barrita
Gloria Wong-Padoongpatt
Rachael D. Robnett
author_facet Kristin Vierra
Aldo Barrita
Gloria Wong-Padoongpatt
Rachael D. Robnett
author_sort Kristin Vierra
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionIn 2020, public outcry against police brutality prompted many social media users to post black squares and use the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter (BLM). Many of the people who posted these squares were engaging in performative action in the sense that they failed to engage with BLM’s history and core principles. Drawing from a critical action framework, the current research seeks to more deeply understand what drives people to engage in more versus less impactful forms of action to resist systemic oppression.MethodsWe employed a mixed-methods and person-centered methodological approach with the goal of providing nuanced information about factors that distinguish among individuals who engage in different forms of action. Participants were 359 undergraduates who reported that they engaged in some form of action to support BLM.FindingsLatent profile analysis identified three subgroups (i.e., latent classes) in the larger sample, which we labeled (1) intentional action, (2) intermediate action, and (3) passive action. Participants in each latent class differed from one another in their sociopolitical attitudes, sociodemographic background, and level of action to support BLM. Through the qualitative coding process, the research team unearthed three overarching themes and a range of subthemes that help to explain why the members of each class engaged in different forms of action.DiscussionWe conclude by proposing a flexible intervention that may motivate individuals to engage in critical action to support BLM.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:06:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b78cedf4540f4a6da26b153aa15432a1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:06:04Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-b78cedf4540f4a6da26b153aa15432a12023-06-27T05:29:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-06-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.11895981189598Critical action to redress systemic oppression: a person-centered approachKristin VierraAldo BarritaGloria Wong-PadoongpattRachael D. RobnettIntroductionIn 2020, public outcry against police brutality prompted many social media users to post black squares and use the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter (BLM). Many of the people who posted these squares were engaging in performative action in the sense that they failed to engage with BLM’s history and core principles. Drawing from a critical action framework, the current research seeks to more deeply understand what drives people to engage in more versus less impactful forms of action to resist systemic oppression.MethodsWe employed a mixed-methods and person-centered methodological approach with the goal of providing nuanced information about factors that distinguish among individuals who engage in different forms of action. Participants were 359 undergraduates who reported that they engaged in some form of action to support BLM.FindingsLatent profile analysis identified three subgroups (i.e., latent classes) in the larger sample, which we labeled (1) intentional action, (2) intermediate action, and (3) passive action. Participants in each latent class differed from one another in their sociopolitical attitudes, sociodemographic background, and level of action to support BLM. Through the qualitative coding process, the research team unearthed three overarching themes and a range of subthemes that help to explain why the members of each class engaged in different forms of action.DiscussionWe conclude by proposing a flexible intervention that may motivate individuals to engage in critical action to support BLM.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1189598/fullBlack Lives Matteractivismcritical actionperformative actionsystemic oppression
spellingShingle Kristin Vierra
Aldo Barrita
Gloria Wong-Padoongpatt
Rachael D. Robnett
Critical action to redress systemic oppression: a person-centered approach
Frontiers in Psychology
Black Lives Matter
activism
critical action
performative action
systemic oppression
title Critical action to redress systemic oppression: a person-centered approach
title_full Critical action to redress systemic oppression: a person-centered approach
title_fullStr Critical action to redress systemic oppression: a person-centered approach
title_full_unstemmed Critical action to redress systemic oppression: a person-centered approach
title_short Critical action to redress systemic oppression: a person-centered approach
title_sort critical action to redress systemic oppression a person centered approach
topic Black Lives Matter
activism
critical action
performative action
systemic oppression
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1189598/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kristinvierra criticalactiontoredresssystemicoppressionapersoncenteredapproach
AT aldobarrita criticalactiontoredresssystemicoppressionapersoncenteredapproach
AT gloriawongpadoongpatt criticalactiontoredresssystemicoppressionapersoncenteredapproach
AT rachaeldrobnett criticalactiontoredresssystemicoppressionapersoncenteredapproach