Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study

BackgroundCase investigation and contact tracing are core public health activities used to interrupt disease transmission. These activities are traditionally conducted manually. During periods of high COVID-19 incidence, US health departments were unable to scale up case mana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin E Cevasco, Amira A Roess
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2023-03-01
Series:JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Online Access:https://publichealth.jmir.org/2023/1/e38633
_version_ 1797734264608915456
author Kevin E Cevasco
Amira A Roess
author_facet Kevin E Cevasco
Amira A Roess
author_sort Kevin E Cevasco
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundCase investigation and contact tracing are core public health activities used to interrupt disease transmission. These activities are traditionally conducted manually. During periods of high COVID-19 incidence, US health departments were unable to scale up case management staff to deliver effective and timely contact-tracing services. In response, digital contact tracing (DCT) apps for mobile phones were introduced to automate these activities. DCT apps detect when other DCT users are close enough to transmit COVID-19 and enable alerts to notify users of potential disease exposure. These apps were deployed quickly during the pandemic without an opportunity to conduct experiments to determine effectiveness. However, it is unclear whether these apps can effectively supplement understaffed manual contact tracers. ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of COVID-19 DCT apps deployed in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) determine if there is sufficient DCT adoption and interest in adoption to meet a minimum population use rate to be effective (56%). To assess uptake, interest and safe use covariates were derived from evaluating DCTs using the American Psychological Association App Evaluation Model (AEM) framework. MethodsWe analyzed data from a nationally representative survey of US adults about their COVID-19–related behaviors and experiences. Survey respondents were divided into three segments: those who adopted a DCT app, those who are interested but did not adopt, and those not interested. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize factors of the three groups. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze the characteristics of segments adopting and interested in DCT apps against AEM framework covariates. ResultsAn insufficient percentage of the population adopted or was interested in DCTs to achieve our minimum national target effectiveness rate (56%). A total of 17.4% (n=490) of the study population reported adopting a DCT app, 24.7% (n=697) reported interest, and 58.0% (n=1637) were not interested. Younger, high-income, and uninsured individuals were more likely to adopt a DCT app. In contrast, people in fair to poor health were interested in DCT apps but did not adopt them. App adoption was positively associated with visiting friends and family outside the home (odds ratio [OR] 1.63, 95% CI 1.28-2.09), not wearing masks (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38-0.71), and adopters thinking they have or had COVID-19 (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.21-2.12). ConclusionsOverall, a small percentage of the population adopted DCT apps. These apps may not be effective in protecting adopters’ friends and family from their maskless contacts outside the home given low adoption rates. The public health community should account for safe use behavioral factors in future public health contact-tracing app design. The AEM framework was useful in developing a study design to evaluate DCT effectiveness and safety.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:41:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b79826da747a442a9a2012e7e7f79bf9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2369-2960
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:41:42Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
spelling doaj.art-b79826da747a442a9a2012e7e7f79bf92023-08-28T23:48:19ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Public Health and Surveillance2369-29602023-03-019e3863310.2196/38633Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional StudyKevin E Cevascohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7082-4836Amira A Roesshttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2321-1575 BackgroundCase investigation and contact tracing are core public health activities used to interrupt disease transmission. These activities are traditionally conducted manually. During periods of high COVID-19 incidence, US health departments were unable to scale up case management staff to deliver effective and timely contact-tracing services. In response, digital contact tracing (DCT) apps for mobile phones were introduced to automate these activities. DCT apps detect when other DCT users are close enough to transmit COVID-19 and enable alerts to notify users of potential disease exposure. These apps were deployed quickly during the pandemic without an opportunity to conduct experiments to determine effectiveness. However, it is unclear whether these apps can effectively supplement understaffed manual contact tracers. ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of COVID-19 DCT apps deployed in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) determine if there is sufficient DCT adoption and interest in adoption to meet a minimum population use rate to be effective (56%). To assess uptake, interest and safe use covariates were derived from evaluating DCTs using the American Psychological Association App Evaluation Model (AEM) framework. MethodsWe analyzed data from a nationally representative survey of US adults about their COVID-19–related behaviors and experiences. Survey respondents were divided into three segments: those who adopted a DCT app, those who are interested but did not adopt, and those not interested. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize factors of the three groups. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze the characteristics of segments adopting and interested in DCT apps against AEM framework covariates. ResultsAn insufficient percentage of the population adopted or was interested in DCTs to achieve our minimum national target effectiveness rate (56%). A total of 17.4% (n=490) of the study population reported adopting a DCT app, 24.7% (n=697) reported interest, and 58.0% (n=1637) were not interested. Younger, high-income, and uninsured individuals were more likely to adopt a DCT app. In contrast, people in fair to poor health were interested in DCT apps but did not adopt them. App adoption was positively associated with visiting friends and family outside the home (odds ratio [OR] 1.63, 95% CI 1.28-2.09), not wearing masks (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38-0.71), and adopters thinking they have or had COVID-19 (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.21-2.12). ConclusionsOverall, a small percentage of the population adopted DCT apps. These apps may not be effective in protecting adopters’ friends and family from their maskless contacts outside the home given low adoption rates. The public health community should account for safe use behavioral factors in future public health contact-tracing app design. The AEM framework was useful in developing a study design to evaluate DCT effectiveness and safety.https://publichealth.jmir.org/2023/1/e38633
spellingShingle Kevin E Cevasco
Amira A Roess
Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
title Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study
title_full Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study
title_short Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study
title_sort adaptation and utilization of a postmarket evaluation model for digital contact tracing mobile health tools in the united states observational cross sectional study
url https://publichealth.jmir.org/2023/1/e38633
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinecevasco adaptationandutilizationofapostmarketevaluationmodelfordigitalcontacttracingmobilehealthtoolsintheunitedstatesobservationalcrosssectionalstudy
AT amiraaroess adaptationandutilizationofapostmarketevaluationmodelfordigitalcontacttracingmobilehealthtoolsintheunitedstatesobservationalcrosssectionalstudy