Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS

Wine elemental composition varies by cultivar, geographic origin, viticultural and enological practices, and is often used for authenticity validation. Elemental analysis of wine by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) is challenging due to the potential for non-spectral interferenc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joshua Godshaw, Helene Hopfer, Jenny Nelson, Susan E. Ebeler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-09-01
Series:Molecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/22/10/1609
_version_ 1818535138701606912
author Joshua Godshaw
Helene Hopfer
Jenny Nelson
Susan E. Ebeler
author_facet Joshua Godshaw
Helene Hopfer
Jenny Nelson
Susan E. Ebeler
author_sort Joshua Godshaw
collection DOAJ
description Wine elemental composition varies by cultivar, geographic origin, viticultural and enological practices, and is often used for authenticity validation. Elemental analysis of wine by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) is challenging due to the potential for non-spectral interferences and plasma instability arising from organic matrix components. Sample preparation mitigates these interferences, however, conflicting recommendations of best practices in ICP-MS analysis of wine have been reported. This study compared direct dilution, microwave-assisted acid digestion, and two filtration sample pretreatments, acidification prior to filtration and filtration followed by acidification, in elemental profiling of one white and three red table wines by ICP-MS. Of 43 monitored isotopes, 37 varied by sample preparation method, with significantly higher results of 17 isotopes in the microwave-digested samples. Both filtration treatments resulted in lower results for 11 isotopes compared to the other methods. Finally, isotope dilution determination of copper based on natural abundances and the 63Cu:65Cu instrument response ratio agreed with external calibration and confirmed a significant sample preparation effect. Overall, microwave digestion did not compare favorably, and direct dilution was found to provide the best compromise between ease of use and result accuracy and precision, although all preparation strategies were able to differentiate the wines.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T18:20:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b79f5493eff04adebcd65b5cee0eabb5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1420-3049
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T18:20:51Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Molecules
spelling doaj.art-b79f5493eff04adebcd65b5cee0eabb52022-12-22T00:55:16ZengMDPI AGMolecules1420-30492017-09-012210160910.3390/molecules22101609molecules22101609Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MSJoshua Godshaw0Helene Hopfer1Jenny Nelson2Susan E. Ebeler3Department of Viticulture & Enology, University of California, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USADepartment of Food Science, The Pennsylvania State University, 202 Food Science Building, University Park, PA 16802, USADepartment of Viticulture & Enology, University of California, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USADepartment of Viticulture & Enology, University of California, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USAWine elemental composition varies by cultivar, geographic origin, viticultural and enological practices, and is often used for authenticity validation. Elemental analysis of wine by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) is challenging due to the potential for non-spectral interferences and plasma instability arising from organic matrix components. Sample preparation mitigates these interferences, however, conflicting recommendations of best practices in ICP-MS analysis of wine have been reported. This study compared direct dilution, microwave-assisted acid digestion, and two filtration sample pretreatments, acidification prior to filtration and filtration followed by acidification, in elemental profiling of one white and three red table wines by ICP-MS. Of 43 monitored isotopes, 37 varied by sample preparation method, with significantly higher results of 17 isotopes in the microwave-digested samples. Both filtration treatments resulted in lower results for 11 isotopes compared to the other methods. Finally, isotope dilution determination of copper based on natural abundances and the 63Cu:65Cu instrument response ratio agreed with external calibration and confirmed a significant sample preparation effect. Overall, microwave digestion did not compare favorably, and direct dilution was found to provide the best compromise between ease of use and result accuracy and precision, although all preparation strategies were able to differentiate the wines.https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/22/10/1609ICP-MSsample preparationwine analysisisotope dilutionelemental profiling
spellingShingle Joshua Godshaw
Helene Hopfer
Jenny Nelson
Susan E. Ebeler
Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS
Molecules
ICP-MS
sample preparation
wine analysis
isotope dilution
elemental profiling
title Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS
title_full Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS
title_fullStr Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS
title_short Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS
title_sort comparison of dilution filtration and microwave digestion sample pretreatments in elemental profiling of wine by icp ms
topic ICP-MS
sample preparation
wine analysis
isotope dilution
elemental profiling
url https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/22/10/1609
work_keys_str_mv AT joshuagodshaw comparisonofdilutionfiltrationandmicrowavedigestionsamplepretreatmentsinelementalprofilingofwinebyicpms
AT helenehopfer comparisonofdilutionfiltrationandmicrowavedigestionsamplepretreatmentsinelementalprofilingofwinebyicpms
AT jennynelson comparisonofdilutionfiltrationandmicrowavedigestionsamplepretreatmentsinelementalprofilingofwinebyicpms
AT susaneebeler comparisonofdilutionfiltrationandmicrowavedigestionsamplepretreatmentsinelementalprofilingofwinebyicpms