Exploring the potential for planning support systems to bridge the research-translation gap between public health and urban planning

Abstract Background There is consensus that planning professionals need clearer guidance on the features that are likely to produce optimal community-wide health benefits. However, much of this evidence resides in academic literature and not in tools accessible to the diverse group of professionals...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paula Hooper, Claire Boulange, Gustavo Arciniegas, Sarah Foster, Julian Bolleter, Chris Pettit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-08-01
Series:International Journal of Health Geographics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-021-00291-z
_version_ 1818612434658656256
author Paula Hooper
Claire Boulange
Gustavo Arciniegas
Sarah Foster
Julian Bolleter
Chris Pettit
author_facet Paula Hooper
Claire Boulange
Gustavo Arciniegas
Sarah Foster
Julian Bolleter
Chris Pettit
author_sort Paula Hooper
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background There is consensus that planning professionals need clearer guidance on the features that are likely to produce optimal community-wide health benefits. However, much of this evidence resides in academic literature and not in tools accessible to the diverse group of professionals shaping our cities. Incorporating health-related metrics into the planning support systems (PSS) provides an opportunity to apply empirical evidence on built environment relationships with health-related outcomes to inform real-world land use and transportation planning decisions. This paper explores the role of planning support systems (PSS) to facilitate the translation and application of health evidence into urban planning and design practices to create healthy, liveable communities. Methods A review of PSS software and a literature review of studies featuring a PSS modelling built environmental features and health impact assessment for designing and creating healthy urban areas was undertaken. Customising existing software, a health impact PSS (the Urban Health Check) was then piloted with a real-world planning application to evaluate the usefulness and benefits of a health impact PSS for demonstrating and communicating potential health impacts of design scenarios in planning practice. Results Eleven PSS software applications were identified, of which three were identified as having the capability to undertake health impact analyses. Three studies met the inclusion criteria of presenting a planning support system customised to support health impact assessment with health impacts modelled or estimated due to changes to the built environment. Evaluation results indicated the Urban Health Check PSS helped in four key areas: visualisation of how the neighbourhood would change in response to a proposed plan; understanding how a plan could benefit the community; Communicate and improve understanding health of planning and design decisions that positively impact health outcomes. Conclusions The use of health-impact PSS have the potential to be transformative for the translation and application of health evidence into planning policy and practice, providing those responsible for the policy and practice of designing and creating our communities with access to quantifiable, evidence-based information about how their decisions might impact community health.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T15:46:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b7a76c90eb5646b89d2c22fbc89f23ee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1476-072X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T15:46:10Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series International Journal of Health Geographics
spelling doaj.art-b7a76c90eb5646b89d2c22fbc89f23ee2022-12-21T22:25:49ZengBMCInternational Journal of Health Geographics1476-072X2021-08-0120111710.1186/s12942-021-00291-zExploring the potential for planning support systems to bridge the research-translation gap between public health and urban planningPaula Hooper0Claire Boulange1Gustavo Arciniegas2Sarah Foster3Julian Bolleter4Chris Pettit5Australian Urban Design Research Centre, School of Design, The University of Western AustraliaKPMG AustraliaGeo-Col GIS and Collaborative PlanningCentre for Urban Research, RMIT UniversityAustralian Urban Design Research Centre, School of Design, The University of Western AustraliaCity Futures Research Centre, UNSWAbstract Background There is consensus that planning professionals need clearer guidance on the features that are likely to produce optimal community-wide health benefits. However, much of this evidence resides in academic literature and not in tools accessible to the diverse group of professionals shaping our cities. Incorporating health-related metrics into the planning support systems (PSS) provides an opportunity to apply empirical evidence on built environment relationships with health-related outcomes to inform real-world land use and transportation planning decisions. This paper explores the role of planning support systems (PSS) to facilitate the translation and application of health evidence into urban planning and design practices to create healthy, liveable communities. Methods A review of PSS software and a literature review of studies featuring a PSS modelling built environmental features and health impact assessment for designing and creating healthy urban areas was undertaken. Customising existing software, a health impact PSS (the Urban Health Check) was then piloted with a real-world planning application to evaluate the usefulness and benefits of a health impact PSS for demonstrating and communicating potential health impacts of design scenarios in planning practice. Results Eleven PSS software applications were identified, of which three were identified as having the capability to undertake health impact analyses. Three studies met the inclusion criteria of presenting a planning support system customised to support health impact assessment with health impacts modelled or estimated due to changes to the built environment. Evaluation results indicated the Urban Health Check PSS helped in four key areas: visualisation of how the neighbourhood would change in response to a proposed plan; understanding how a plan could benefit the community; Communicate and improve understanding health of planning and design decisions that positively impact health outcomes. Conclusions The use of health-impact PSS have the potential to be transformative for the translation and application of health evidence into planning policy and practice, providing those responsible for the policy and practice of designing and creating our communities with access to quantifiable, evidence-based information about how their decisions might impact community health.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-021-00291-zPlanning support systemsParticipatory planningScenario planningLand use planningHealthHealth impact
spellingShingle Paula Hooper
Claire Boulange
Gustavo Arciniegas
Sarah Foster
Julian Bolleter
Chris Pettit
Exploring the potential for planning support systems to bridge the research-translation gap between public health and urban planning
International Journal of Health Geographics
Planning support systems
Participatory planning
Scenario planning
Land use planning
Health
Health impact
title Exploring the potential for planning support systems to bridge the research-translation gap between public health and urban planning
title_full Exploring the potential for planning support systems to bridge the research-translation gap between public health and urban planning
title_fullStr Exploring the potential for planning support systems to bridge the research-translation gap between public health and urban planning
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the potential for planning support systems to bridge the research-translation gap between public health and urban planning
title_short Exploring the potential for planning support systems to bridge the research-translation gap between public health and urban planning
title_sort exploring the potential for planning support systems to bridge the research translation gap between public health and urban planning
topic Planning support systems
Participatory planning
Scenario planning
Land use planning
Health
Health impact
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-021-00291-z
work_keys_str_mv AT paulahooper exploringthepotentialforplanningsupportsystemstobridgetheresearchtranslationgapbetweenpublichealthandurbanplanning
AT claireboulange exploringthepotentialforplanningsupportsystemstobridgetheresearchtranslationgapbetweenpublichealthandurbanplanning
AT gustavoarciniegas exploringthepotentialforplanningsupportsystemstobridgetheresearchtranslationgapbetweenpublichealthandurbanplanning
AT sarahfoster exploringthepotentialforplanningsupportsystemstobridgetheresearchtranslationgapbetweenpublichealthandurbanplanning
AT julianbolleter exploringthepotentialforplanningsupportsystemstobridgetheresearchtranslationgapbetweenpublichealthandurbanplanning
AT chrispettit exploringthepotentialforplanningsupportsystemstobridgetheresearchtranslationgapbetweenpublichealthandurbanplanning