Low-Velocity Impact Resistance of Al/Gf/PP Laminates with Different Interface Performance

The weak interface performance between metal and composite (IPMC) makes the composite materials susceptible to impact load. Aluminum/glass fiber/polypropylene (Al/Gf/PP) laminates were manufactured with the aluminum alloy sheets modified by nitrogen plasma surface treatment and the phosphoric acid a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yanyan Lin, Huaguan Li, Zhongwei Zhang, Jie Tao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Polymers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/24/4416
_version_ 1797501196168069120
author Yanyan Lin
Huaguan Li
Zhongwei Zhang
Jie Tao
author_facet Yanyan Lin
Huaguan Li
Zhongwei Zhang
Jie Tao
author_sort Yanyan Lin
collection DOAJ
description The weak interface performance between metal and composite (IPMC) makes the composite materials susceptible to impact load. Aluminum/glass fiber/polypropylene (Al/Gf/PP) laminates were manufactured with the aluminum alloy sheets modified by nitrogen plasma surface treatment and the phosphoric acid anodizing method, respectively. FEM models of Al/Gf/PP laminates under low-velocity impact were established in ABAQUS/Explicit based on the generated data including the model I and II interlaminar fracture toughness. Low-velocity impact tests were performed to investigate the impact resistance of Al/Gf/PP laminates including load traces, failure mechanism, and energy absorption. The results showed that delamination was the main failure mode of two kinds of laminates under the impact energy of 20 J and 30 J. When the impact energy was between 40 J and 50 J, there were metal cracks on the rear surface of the plasma pretreated specimens, which possessed higher energy absorption and impact resistance, although the integrity of the laminates could not be preserved. Since the residual compressive stress was generated during the cooling process, the laminates were more susceptible to stretching rather than delamination. For impact energy (60 J) causing the through-the-thickness crack of two kinds of laminates, plasma pretreated specimens exhibited higher SEA values close to 9 Jm<sup>2</sup>/kg due to better IPMC. Combined with the FEM simulation results, the interface played a role in stress transmission and specimens with better IPMC enabled the laminates to absorb more energy.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:14:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b7a9cad24efa4610a0144e619ccdc7a2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4360
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:14:53Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Polymers
spelling doaj.art-b7a9cad24efa4610a0144e619ccdc7a22023-11-23T10:16:04ZengMDPI AGPolymers2073-43602021-12-011324441610.3390/polym13244416Low-Velocity Impact Resistance of Al/Gf/PP Laminates with Different Interface PerformanceYanyan Lin0Huaguan Li1Zhongwei Zhang2Jie Tao3College of Material Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, ChinaJiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Structural Materials and Application Technology, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Explosion & Impact and Disaster Prevention & Mitigation, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing 210007, ChinaCollege of Material Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, ChinaThe weak interface performance between metal and composite (IPMC) makes the composite materials susceptible to impact load. Aluminum/glass fiber/polypropylene (Al/Gf/PP) laminates were manufactured with the aluminum alloy sheets modified by nitrogen plasma surface treatment and the phosphoric acid anodizing method, respectively. FEM models of Al/Gf/PP laminates under low-velocity impact were established in ABAQUS/Explicit based on the generated data including the model I and II interlaminar fracture toughness. Low-velocity impact tests were performed to investigate the impact resistance of Al/Gf/PP laminates including load traces, failure mechanism, and energy absorption. The results showed that delamination was the main failure mode of two kinds of laminates under the impact energy of 20 J and 30 J. When the impact energy was between 40 J and 50 J, there were metal cracks on the rear surface of the plasma pretreated specimens, which possessed higher energy absorption and impact resistance, although the integrity of the laminates could not be preserved. Since the residual compressive stress was generated during the cooling process, the laminates were more susceptible to stretching rather than delamination. For impact energy (60 J) causing the through-the-thickness crack of two kinds of laminates, plasma pretreated specimens exhibited higher SEA values close to 9 Jm<sup>2</sup>/kg due to better IPMC. Combined with the FEM simulation results, the interface played a role in stress transmission and specimens with better IPMC enabled the laminates to absorb more energy.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/24/4416Al/Gf/PP laminateslow-velocity impactinterface performanceplasma surface treatmentfracture toughness
spellingShingle Yanyan Lin
Huaguan Li
Zhongwei Zhang
Jie Tao
Low-Velocity Impact Resistance of Al/Gf/PP Laminates with Different Interface Performance
Polymers
Al/Gf/PP laminates
low-velocity impact
interface performance
plasma surface treatment
fracture toughness
title Low-Velocity Impact Resistance of Al/Gf/PP Laminates with Different Interface Performance
title_full Low-Velocity Impact Resistance of Al/Gf/PP Laminates with Different Interface Performance
title_fullStr Low-Velocity Impact Resistance of Al/Gf/PP Laminates with Different Interface Performance
title_full_unstemmed Low-Velocity Impact Resistance of Al/Gf/PP Laminates with Different Interface Performance
title_short Low-Velocity Impact Resistance of Al/Gf/PP Laminates with Different Interface Performance
title_sort low velocity impact resistance of al gf pp laminates with different interface performance
topic Al/Gf/PP laminates
low-velocity impact
interface performance
plasma surface treatment
fracture toughness
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/24/4416
work_keys_str_mv AT yanyanlin lowvelocityimpactresistanceofalgfpplaminateswithdifferentinterfaceperformance
AT huaguanli lowvelocityimpactresistanceofalgfpplaminateswithdifferentinterfaceperformance
AT zhongweizhang lowvelocityimpactresistanceofalgfpplaminateswithdifferentinterfaceperformance
AT jietao lowvelocityimpactresistanceofalgfpplaminateswithdifferentinterfaceperformance