Study of informal reasoning in judicial agents in sexual aggression cases
Background/ObjectiveJudicial decisions must rest on formal reasoning. Nevertheless, informal reasoning sources (cognitive and motivational biases) were observed in judicial judgment making. Literature has identified sexual aggression cases as the most favorable for informal reasoning. Thus, a field...
Main Authors: | Xaviera Camplá, Yurena Gancedo, Jéssica Sanmarco, Álvaro Montes, Mercedes Novo |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866145/full |
Similar Items
-
Challenges to reasoning in forensic science decisions
by: Barbara A. Spellman, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
When Type 2 Processing Misfires: The Indiscriminate Use of Statistical Thinking about Reasoning Problems
by: Mário B. Ferreira, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
Knowledge in International Relations: Susceptibilities to Motivated Reasoning Among Experts and Non-Experts
by: Peter Beattie, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Editorial: Understanding and Overcoming Biases in Judgment and Decision-Making With Real-Life Consequences
by: Yasmina Okan, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01) -
Measuring Reasoning about Teaching for Graduate Admissions in Psychology and Related Disciplines
by: Robert J. Sternberg, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)