The time cost of physiologically ineffective intravenous fluids in the emergency department: an observational pilot study employing wearable Doppler ultrasound

Abstract Background Little data exist on the time spent by emergency department (ED) personnel providing intravenous (IV) fluid to ‘responsive’ versus ‘unresponsive’ patients. Methods A prospective, convenience sample of adult ED patients was studied; patients were enrolled if preload expansion was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jon-Émile S. Kenny, Stanley O. Gibbs, Delaney Johnston, Zhen Yang, Lisa M. Hofer, Mai Elfarnawany, Joseph K. Eibl, Amanda Johnson, Anthony J. Buecker, Vivian C. Lau, Benjamin O. Kemp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-02-01
Series:Journal of Intensive Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00655-6
_version_ 1797865492730347520
author Jon-Émile S. Kenny
Stanley O. Gibbs
Delaney Johnston
Zhen Yang
Lisa M. Hofer
Mai Elfarnawany
Joseph K. Eibl
Amanda Johnson
Anthony J. Buecker
Vivian C. Lau
Benjamin O. Kemp
author_facet Jon-Émile S. Kenny
Stanley O. Gibbs
Delaney Johnston
Zhen Yang
Lisa M. Hofer
Mai Elfarnawany
Joseph K. Eibl
Amanda Johnson
Anthony J. Buecker
Vivian C. Lau
Benjamin O. Kemp
author_sort Jon-Émile S. Kenny
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Little data exist on the time spent by emergency department (ED) personnel providing intravenous (IV) fluid to ‘responsive’ versus ‘unresponsive’ patients. Methods A prospective, convenience sample of adult ED patients was studied; patients were enrolled if preload expansion was indicated for any reason. Using a novel, wireless, wearable ultrasound, carotid artery Doppler was obtained before and throughout a preload challenge (PC) prior to each bag of ordered IV fluid. The treating clinician was blinded to the results of the ultrasound. IV fluid was deemed ‘effective’ or ‘ineffective’ based on the greatest change in carotid artery corrected flow time (ccFT∆) during the PC. The duration, in minutes, of each bag of IV fluid administered was recorded. Results 53 patients were recruited and 2 excluded for Doppler artifact. There were 86 total PCs included in the investigation comprising 81.7 L of administered IV fluid. 19,667 carotid Doppler cardiac cycles were analyzed. Using ccFT∆ ≥  + 7 ms to discriminate ‘physiologically effective’ from ‘ineffective’ IV fluid, we observed that 54 PCs (63%) were ‘effective’, comprising 51.7 L of IV fluid, whereas, 32 (37%) were ‘ineffective’ comprising 30 L of IV fluid. 29.75 total hours across all 51 patients were spent in the ED providing IV fluids categorized as ‘ineffective.’ Conclusions We report the largest-known carotid artery Doppler analysis (i.e., roughly 20,000 cardiac cycles) in ED patients requiring IV fluid expansion. A clinically significant amount of time was spent providing physiologically ineffective IV fluid. This may represent an avenue to improve ED care efficiency.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T23:08:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b7d18ac40a4b4850a55ae51dc8172abe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2052-0492
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T23:08:41Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Intensive Care
spelling doaj.art-b7d18ac40a4b4850a55ae51dc8172abe2023-03-22T10:32:47ZengBMCJournal of Intensive Care2052-04922023-02-011111910.1186/s40560-023-00655-6The time cost of physiologically ineffective intravenous fluids in the emergency department: an observational pilot study employing wearable Doppler ultrasoundJon-Émile S. Kenny0Stanley O. Gibbs1Delaney Johnston2Zhen Yang3Lisa M. Hofer4Mai Elfarnawany5Joseph K. Eibl6Amanda Johnson7Anthony J. Buecker8Vivian C. Lau9Benjamin O. Kemp10Health Sciences North Research InstituteFlosonics Medical 325 W. Front StreetFlosonics Medical 325 W. Front StreetFlosonics Medical 325 W. Front StreetFlosonics Medical 325 W. Front StreetFlosonics Medical 325 W. Front StreetHealth Sciences North Research InstituteOSF Saint Francis Medical CenterOSF Saint Francis Medical CenterOSF Saint Francis Medical CenterOSF Saint Francis Medical CenterAbstract Background Little data exist on the time spent by emergency department (ED) personnel providing intravenous (IV) fluid to ‘responsive’ versus ‘unresponsive’ patients. Methods A prospective, convenience sample of adult ED patients was studied; patients were enrolled if preload expansion was indicated for any reason. Using a novel, wireless, wearable ultrasound, carotid artery Doppler was obtained before and throughout a preload challenge (PC) prior to each bag of ordered IV fluid. The treating clinician was blinded to the results of the ultrasound. IV fluid was deemed ‘effective’ or ‘ineffective’ based on the greatest change in carotid artery corrected flow time (ccFT∆) during the PC. The duration, in minutes, of each bag of IV fluid administered was recorded. Results 53 patients were recruited and 2 excluded for Doppler artifact. There were 86 total PCs included in the investigation comprising 81.7 L of administered IV fluid. 19,667 carotid Doppler cardiac cycles were analyzed. Using ccFT∆ ≥  + 7 ms to discriminate ‘physiologically effective’ from ‘ineffective’ IV fluid, we observed that 54 PCs (63%) were ‘effective’, comprising 51.7 L of IV fluid, whereas, 32 (37%) were ‘ineffective’ comprising 30 L of IV fluid. 29.75 total hours across all 51 patients were spent in the ED providing IV fluids categorized as ‘ineffective.’ Conclusions We report the largest-known carotid artery Doppler analysis (i.e., roughly 20,000 cardiac cycles) in ED patients requiring IV fluid expansion. A clinically significant amount of time was spent providing physiologically ineffective IV fluid. This may represent an avenue to improve ED care efficiency.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00655-6Doppler ultrasoundCarotid arteryFluid responsivenessFluid refractoryQuality improvementPersonalized medicine
spellingShingle Jon-Émile S. Kenny
Stanley O. Gibbs
Delaney Johnston
Zhen Yang
Lisa M. Hofer
Mai Elfarnawany
Joseph K. Eibl
Amanda Johnson
Anthony J. Buecker
Vivian C. Lau
Benjamin O. Kemp
The time cost of physiologically ineffective intravenous fluids in the emergency department: an observational pilot study employing wearable Doppler ultrasound
Journal of Intensive Care
Doppler ultrasound
Carotid artery
Fluid responsiveness
Fluid refractory
Quality improvement
Personalized medicine
title The time cost of physiologically ineffective intravenous fluids in the emergency department: an observational pilot study employing wearable Doppler ultrasound
title_full The time cost of physiologically ineffective intravenous fluids in the emergency department: an observational pilot study employing wearable Doppler ultrasound
title_fullStr The time cost of physiologically ineffective intravenous fluids in the emergency department: an observational pilot study employing wearable Doppler ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed The time cost of physiologically ineffective intravenous fluids in the emergency department: an observational pilot study employing wearable Doppler ultrasound
title_short The time cost of physiologically ineffective intravenous fluids in the emergency department: an observational pilot study employing wearable Doppler ultrasound
title_sort time cost of physiologically ineffective intravenous fluids in the emergency department an observational pilot study employing wearable doppler ultrasound
topic Doppler ultrasound
Carotid artery
Fluid responsiveness
Fluid refractory
Quality improvement
Personalized medicine
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00655-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jonemileskenny thetimecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT stanleyogibbs thetimecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT delaneyjohnston thetimecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT zhenyang thetimecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT lisamhofer thetimecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT maielfarnawany thetimecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT josephkeibl thetimecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT amandajohnson thetimecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT anthonyjbuecker thetimecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT vivianclau thetimecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT benjaminokemp thetimecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT jonemileskenny timecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT stanleyogibbs timecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT delaneyjohnston timecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT zhenyang timecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT lisamhofer timecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT maielfarnawany timecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT josephkeibl timecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT amandajohnson timecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT anthonyjbuecker timecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT vivianclau timecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound
AT benjaminokemp timecostofphysiologicallyineffectiveintravenousfluidsintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalpilotstudyemployingwearabledopplerultrasound