Communities of practice and PISA for Schools: Comparative learning or a mode of educational governance?

This paper examines the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) PISA for Schools, a new variant of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) that compares school-level performance on reading, math and science with international schooling systems (e.g., Shanghai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Steven Lewis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2017-08-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2901
_version_ 1819115588534927360
author Steven Lewis
author_facet Steven Lewis
author_sort Steven Lewis
collection DOAJ
description This paper examines the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) PISA for Schools, a new variant of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) that compares school-level performance on reading, math and science with international schooling systems (e.g., Shanghai-China, Finland). Specifically, I focus here on a professional learning community – the Global Learning Network (GLN) – of U.S. schools and districts that have voluntarily participated in PISA for Schools, and how this, arguably, helps to normatively determine ‘what works’ in education. Drawing suggestively across diverse thinking around contemporary modes of governance, and emerging topological spaces and relations associated with globalization, and informed by interviews with 33 policy actors across the PISA for Schools policy cycle, my analyses suggest that GLN allows the OECD to discursively and normatively constrain how ‘world-class’ schools and systems, and their policies and practices, are defined. However, and in light of the productive capacities of power relations, I also argue that GLN provides opportunities for local educators and leaders to undertake meaningful collaboration and sharing, and to find policy spaces outside of those defined by more performative discursive framings of school accountability. To this end, I explore how GLN may help to foster alternative policy spaces from which educators can ‘talk back’ to national and state authorities, and potentially promote more ‘authentic’ understandings of, and possibilities for, schooling accountability.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T05:03:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b7d33876169140baa81048a652753808
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1068-2341
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T05:03:35Z
publishDate 2017-08-01
publisher Arizona State University
record_format Article
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
spelling doaj.art-b7d33876169140baa81048a6527538082022-12-21T18:38:10ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412017-08-0125010.14507/epaa.25.29011663Communities of practice and PISA for Schools: Comparative learning or a mode of educational governance?Steven Lewis0Centre of Research for Educational Impact (REDI), Deakin UniversityThis paper examines the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) PISA for Schools, a new variant of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) that compares school-level performance on reading, math and science with international schooling systems (e.g., Shanghai-China, Finland). Specifically, I focus here on a professional learning community – the Global Learning Network (GLN) – of U.S. schools and districts that have voluntarily participated in PISA for Schools, and how this, arguably, helps to normatively determine ‘what works’ in education. Drawing suggestively across diverse thinking around contemporary modes of governance, and emerging topological spaces and relations associated with globalization, and informed by interviews with 33 policy actors across the PISA for Schools policy cycle, my analyses suggest that GLN allows the OECD to discursively and normatively constrain how ‘world-class’ schools and systems, and their policies and practices, are defined. However, and in light of the productive capacities of power relations, I also argue that GLN provides opportunities for local educators and leaders to undertake meaningful collaboration and sharing, and to find policy spaces outside of those defined by more performative discursive framings of school accountability. To this end, I explore how GLN may help to foster alternative policy spaces from which educators can ‘talk back’ to national and state authorities, and potentially promote more ‘authentic’ understandings of, and possibilities for, schooling accountability.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2901PISA for SchoolsOECDgovernanceGlobal Learning Networkbest practiceprofessional learning communitiestopology
spellingShingle Steven Lewis
Communities of practice and PISA for Schools: Comparative learning or a mode of educational governance?
Education Policy Analysis Archives
PISA for Schools
OECD
governance
Global Learning Network
best practice
professional learning communities
topology
title Communities of practice and PISA for Schools: Comparative learning or a mode of educational governance?
title_full Communities of practice and PISA for Schools: Comparative learning or a mode of educational governance?
title_fullStr Communities of practice and PISA for Schools: Comparative learning or a mode of educational governance?
title_full_unstemmed Communities of practice and PISA for Schools: Comparative learning or a mode of educational governance?
title_short Communities of practice and PISA for Schools: Comparative learning or a mode of educational governance?
title_sort communities of practice and pisa for schools comparative learning or a mode of educational governance
topic PISA for Schools
OECD
governance
Global Learning Network
best practice
professional learning communities
topology
url https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2901
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenlewis communitiesofpracticeandpisaforschoolscomparativelearningoramodeofeducationalgovernance