Latin American Populism: Tentative Reflections for a Global Historiographical Perspective
Latin American populism has usually been considered as an integrationist strategy towards the urban working classes in the context of mass democracy and import substitution industrialization. Among its features, the following ones can be identified: support from the working classes, charismatic lead...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains
2013-02-01
|
Series: | Nuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/64834 |
_version_ | 1797307228195127296 |
---|---|
author | Omar Acha |
author_facet | Omar Acha |
author_sort | Omar Acha |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Latin American populism has usually been considered as an integrationist strategy towards the urban working classes in the context of mass democracy and import substitution industrialization. Among its features, the following ones can be identified: support from the working classes, charismatic leadership, nationalism and anti-intellectualism, anti-communism, state-centered conception of historical change, and corporatism. Recent writings influenced by the “linguistic” and “cultural” turns, despite their different social ontologies, also proclaim Latin American populisms’ peculiarity. In these cases the notion of “political style” prevails over socio-economic explanations. The available investigations are often based on national experiences or comparative approaches among two (or three) cases like Peronism and Varguism, or Cardenism. In so doing they provide a catalogue of “populisms” instead of a common understanding of the so called “Latin American” populism. This paper aims to review the very question of “Latin American populism” from a critical understanding of a global historiographical perspective. From this complex point of view it will be argued that historical analysis requires a globalizing critique of the prevailing social theory, and of the often implicit historiographical assumptions. The core of the argumentation will be focused on the Western distinction between state politics and civil society. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T00:53:12Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b7d5a49c284b4f8f9b8c8a74ae304559 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1626-0252 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T00:53:12Z |
publishDate | 2013-02-01 |
publisher | Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains |
record_format | Article |
series | Nuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos |
spelling | doaj.art-b7d5a49c284b4f8f9b8c8a74ae3045592024-02-14T16:54:54ZengCentre de Recherches sur les Mondes AméricainsNuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos1626-02522013-02-0110.4000/nuevomundo.64834Latin American Populism: Tentative Reflections for a Global Historiographical PerspectiveOmar AchaLatin American populism has usually been considered as an integrationist strategy towards the urban working classes in the context of mass democracy and import substitution industrialization. Among its features, the following ones can be identified: support from the working classes, charismatic leadership, nationalism and anti-intellectualism, anti-communism, state-centered conception of historical change, and corporatism. Recent writings influenced by the “linguistic” and “cultural” turns, despite their different social ontologies, also proclaim Latin American populisms’ peculiarity. In these cases the notion of “political style” prevails over socio-economic explanations. The available investigations are often based on national experiences or comparative approaches among two (or three) cases like Peronism and Varguism, or Cardenism. In so doing they provide a catalogue of “populisms” instead of a common understanding of the so called “Latin American” populism. This paper aims to review the very question of “Latin American populism” from a critical understanding of a global historiographical perspective. From this complex point of view it will be argued that historical analysis requires a globalizing critique of the prevailing social theory, and of the often implicit historiographical assumptions. The core of the argumentation will be focused on the Western distinction between state politics and civil society.https://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/64834politicsLatin AmericaPopulismstatecivil society |
spellingShingle | Omar Acha Latin American Populism: Tentative Reflections for a Global Historiographical Perspective Nuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos politics Latin America Populism state civil society |
title | Latin American Populism: Tentative Reflections for a Global Historiographical Perspective |
title_full | Latin American Populism: Tentative Reflections for a Global Historiographical Perspective |
title_fullStr | Latin American Populism: Tentative Reflections for a Global Historiographical Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Latin American Populism: Tentative Reflections for a Global Historiographical Perspective |
title_short | Latin American Populism: Tentative Reflections for a Global Historiographical Perspective |
title_sort | latin american populism tentative reflections for a global historiographical perspective |
topic | politics Latin America Populism state civil society |
url | https://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/64834 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT omaracha latinamericanpopulismtentativereflectionsforaglobalhistoriographicalperspective |