A mutual comparison of pregnancy outcomes between different conception modes: a propensity score matching based retrospective cohort study

BackgroundAssisted reproductive technology (ART) has been reported to have negative effects on maternal and neonatal health. Ovulation induction (OI) was reported to be associated with alteration of epigenetic modification of mice embryos, and extinguishing the influence of ovulation induction and i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chang-Fa Sun, Jian-Zhong Sheng, He-Feng Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Endocrinology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2024.1351991/full
_version_ 1827374954179461120
author Chang-Fa Sun
Jian-Zhong Sheng
He-Feng Huang
He-Feng Huang
He-Feng Huang
He-Feng Huang
author_facet Chang-Fa Sun
Jian-Zhong Sheng
He-Feng Huang
He-Feng Huang
He-Feng Huang
He-Feng Huang
author_sort Chang-Fa Sun
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundAssisted reproductive technology (ART) has been reported to have negative effects on maternal and neonatal health. Ovulation induction (OI) was reported to be associated with alteration of epigenetic modification of mice embryos, and extinguishing the influence of ovulation induction and in vitro operations on maternal and neonatal health will bring benefits for reducing side effects. The present study aimed to determine whether ovulation induction alone and ART are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and whether ART could induce a higher risk than ovulation induction alone.MethodsA total of 51,172 cases with singleton live birth between Jan 2016 and May 2019 at the International Peace Maternal and Child Health Hospital were included in this study. Conception modes documented during registration were classified into natural conception (NC), OI, and ART. Pregnancy outcomes of the three groups with balanced baseline characteristics by propensity score matching were compared. The relative risks of maternal and neonatal outcomes were calculated by logistic regression analysis.ResultsCompared with natural conception, infertility treatments are associated with gestational diabetes (OI: OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.31-2.27; ART: OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.26-2.20), preeclampsia/eclampsia (OI: OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.03-3.36; ART: OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.26-3.92). Even if gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, and placental problems were adjusted, infertility treatments are associated with birth before 37 weeks (OI: OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.28-3.12; ART: OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.08-2.69), low birth weight (OI: OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.23-3.91; ART: OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.05-3.45), and SGA (OI: OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.20-4.87; ART: OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.28-5.11). ART but not OI is associated with a higher risk of birth before 34 weeks (OR:3.12, 95% CI 1.21-8.05). By comparing the OI group with the ART group, we only found that ART could induce a higher ratio of placental problems (5.0%, 26/518 vs 2.1%, 11/519, p<0.05).ConclusionBoth OI and ART are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. ART induced comparable negative effects with OI on gestational complications, birth weight, and premature birth (<37 weeks). However, ART resulted in a higher risk of placental problems than group NC and OI. The incidence of birth before 34 weeks of gestation in the ART group tends to be higher than in the OI group, but not statistically significant. The side effects of ART may originate from OI.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T11:43:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b7dcf4cf341b4a01b65053d8d871c6f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2392
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T11:43:44Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Endocrinology
spelling doaj.art-b7dcf4cf341b4a01b65053d8d871c6f82024-01-25T04:32:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Endocrinology1664-23922024-01-011510.3389/fendo.2024.13519911351991A mutual comparison of pregnancy outcomes between different conception modes: a propensity score matching based retrospective cohort studyChang-Fa Sun0Jian-Zhong Sheng1He-Feng Huang2He-Feng Huang3He-Feng Huang4He-Feng Huang5Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, ChinaInternational Institutes of Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, ChinaInternational Institutes of Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, ChinaInternational Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, ChinaObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Key Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education), School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaBackgroundAssisted reproductive technology (ART) has been reported to have negative effects on maternal and neonatal health. Ovulation induction (OI) was reported to be associated with alteration of epigenetic modification of mice embryos, and extinguishing the influence of ovulation induction and in vitro operations on maternal and neonatal health will bring benefits for reducing side effects. The present study aimed to determine whether ovulation induction alone and ART are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and whether ART could induce a higher risk than ovulation induction alone.MethodsA total of 51,172 cases with singleton live birth between Jan 2016 and May 2019 at the International Peace Maternal and Child Health Hospital were included in this study. Conception modes documented during registration were classified into natural conception (NC), OI, and ART. Pregnancy outcomes of the three groups with balanced baseline characteristics by propensity score matching were compared. The relative risks of maternal and neonatal outcomes were calculated by logistic regression analysis.ResultsCompared with natural conception, infertility treatments are associated with gestational diabetes (OI: OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.31-2.27; ART: OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.26-2.20), preeclampsia/eclampsia (OI: OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.03-3.36; ART: OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.26-3.92). Even if gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, and placental problems were adjusted, infertility treatments are associated with birth before 37 weeks (OI: OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.28-3.12; ART: OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.08-2.69), low birth weight (OI: OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.23-3.91; ART: OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.05-3.45), and SGA (OI: OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.20-4.87; ART: OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.28-5.11). ART but not OI is associated with a higher risk of birth before 34 weeks (OR:3.12, 95% CI 1.21-8.05). By comparing the OI group with the ART group, we only found that ART could induce a higher ratio of placental problems (5.0%, 26/518 vs 2.1%, 11/519, p<0.05).ConclusionBoth OI and ART are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. ART induced comparable negative effects with OI on gestational complications, birth weight, and premature birth (<37 weeks). However, ART resulted in a higher risk of placental problems than group NC and OI. The incidence of birth before 34 weeks of gestation in the ART group tends to be higher than in the OI group, but not statistically significant. The side effects of ART may originate from OI.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2024.1351991/fullOIartpreterm birthlow birth weightgestational diabetes
spellingShingle Chang-Fa Sun
Jian-Zhong Sheng
He-Feng Huang
He-Feng Huang
He-Feng Huang
He-Feng Huang
A mutual comparison of pregnancy outcomes between different conception modes: a propensity score matching based retrospective cohort study
Frontiers in Endocrinology
OI
art
preterm birth
low birth weight
gestational diabetes
title A mutual comparison of pregnancy outcomes between different conception modes: a propensity score matching based retrospective cohort study
title_full A mutual comparison of pregnancy outcomes between different conception modes: a propensity score matching based retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr A mutual comparison of pregnancy outcomes between different conception modes: a propensity score matching based retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed A mutual comparison of pregnancy outcomes between different conception modes: a propensity score matching based retrospective cohort study
title_short A mutual comparison of pregnancy outcomes between different conception modes: a propensity score matching based retrospective cohort study
title_sort mutual comparison of pregnancy outcomes between different conception modes a propensity score matching based retrospective cohort study
topic OI
art
preterm birth
low birth weight
gestational diabetes
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2024.1351991/full
work_keys_str_mv AT changfasun amutualcomparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweendifferentconceptionmodesapropensityscorematchingbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jianzhongsheng amutualcomparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweendifferentconceptionmodesapropensityscorematchingbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hefenghuang amutualcomparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweendifferentconceptionmodesapropensityscorematchingbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hefenghuang amutualcomparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweendifferentconceptionmodesapropensityscorematchingbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hefenghuang amutualcomparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweendifferentconceptionmodesapropensityscorematchingbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hefenghuang amutualcomparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweendifferentconceptionmodesapropensityscorematchingbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT changfasun mutualcomparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweendifferentconceptionmodesapropensityscorematchingbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jianzhongsheng mutualcomparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweendifferentconceptionmodesapropensityscorematchingbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hefenghuang mutualcomparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweendifferentconceptionmodesapropensityscorematchingbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hefenghuang mutualcomparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweendifferentconceptionmodesapropensityscorematchingbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hefenghuang mutualcomparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweendifferentconceptionmodesapropensityscorematchingbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hefenghuang mutualcomparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweendifferentconceptionmodesapropensityscorematchingbasedretrospectivecohortstudy