Response of atomic spin-based sensors to magnetic and nonmagnetic perturbations
Abstract Searches for pseudo-magnetic spin couplings require implementation of techniques capable of sensitive detection of such interactions. While Spin-Exchange Relaxation Free (SERF) magnetometry is one of the most powerful approaches enabling the searches, it suffers from a strong magnetic coupl...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2022-01-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03609-w |
_version_ | 1797653575131725824 |
---|---|
author | Mikhail Padniuk Marek Kopciuch Riccardo Cipolletti Arne Wickenbrock Dmitry Budker Szymon Pustelny |
author_facet | Mikhail Padniuk Marek Kopciuch Riccardo Cipolletti Arne Wickenbrock Dmitry Budker Szymon Pustelny |
author_sort | Mikhail Padniuk |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Searches for pseudo-magnetic spin couplings require implementation of techniques capable of sensitive detection of such interactions. While Spin-Exchange Relaxation Free (SERF) magnetometry is one of the most powerful approaches enabling the searches, it suffers from a strong magnetic coupling, deteriorating the pseudo-magnetic coupling sensitivity. To address this problem, here, we compare, via numerical simulations, the performance of SERF magnetometer and noble-gas-alkali-metal co-magnetometer, operating in a so-called self-compensating regime. We demonstrate that the co-magnetometer allows reduction of the sensitivity to low-frequency magnetic fields without loss of the sensitivity to nonmagnetic couplings. Based on that we investigate the responses of both systems to the oscillating and transient spin perturbations. Our simulations reveal about five orders of magnitude stronger response to the neutron pseudo-magnetic coupling and about three orders of magnitude stronger response to the proton pseudo-magnetic coupling of the co-magnetometer than those of the SERF magnetometer. Different frequency responses of the co-magnetometer to magnetic and nonmagnetic perturbations enables differentiation between these two types of interactions. This outlines the ability to implement the co-magnetometer as an advanced sensor for the Global Network of Optical Magnetometer for Exotic Physics searches (GNOME), aiming at detection of ultra-light bosons (e.g., axion-like particles). |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T16:46:34Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b7e100dafd31489a87335d28e230d45f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2045-2322 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T16:46:34Z |
publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
publisher | Nature Portfolio |
record_format | Article |
series | Scientific Reports |
spelling | doaj.art-b7e100dafd31489a87335d28e230d45f2023-10-22T11:10:39ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-01-011211910.1038/s41598-021-03609-wResponse of atomic spin-based sensors to magnetic and nonmagnetic perturbationsMikhail Padniuk0Marek Kopciuch1Riccardo Cipolletti2Arne Wickenbrock3Dmitry Budker4Szymon Pustelny5Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian UniversityMarian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian UniversityHelmholtz Institute, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat at MainzHelmholtz Institute, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat at MainzHelmholtz Institute, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat at MainzMarian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian UniversityAbstract Searches for pseudo-magnetic spin couplings require implementation of techniques capable of sensitive detection of such interactions. While Spin-Exchange Relaxation Free (SERF) magnetometry is one of the most powerful approaches enabling the searches, it suffers from a strong magnetic coupling, deteriorating the pseudo-magnetic coupling sensitivity. To address this problem, here, we compare, via numerical simulations, the performance of SERF magnetometer and noble-gas-alkali-metal co-magnetometer, operating in a so-called self-compensating regime. We demonstrate that the co-magnetometer allows reduction of the sensitivity to low-frequency magnetic fields without loss of the sensitivity to nonmagnetic couplings. Based on that we investigate the responses of both systems to the oscillating and transient spin perturbations. Our simulations reveal about five orders of magnitude stronger response to the neutron pseudo-magnetic coupling and about three orders of magnitude stronger response to the proton pseudo-magnetic coupling of the co-magnetometer than those of the SERF magnetometer. Different frequency responses of the co-magnetometer to magnetic and nonmagnetic perturbations enables differentiation between these two types of interactions. This outlines the ability to implement the co-magnetometer as an advanced sensor for the Global Network of Optical Magnetometer for Exotic Physics searches (GNOME), aiming at detection of ultra-light bosons (e.g., axion-like particles).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03609-w |
spellingShingle | Mikhail Padniuk Marek Kopciuch Riccardo Cipolletti Arne Wickenbrock Dmitry Budker Szymon Pustelny Response of atomic spin-based sensors to magnetic and nonmagnetic perturbations Scientific Reports |
title | Response of atomic spin-based sensors to magnetic and nonmagnetic perturbations |
title_full | Response of atomic spin-based sensors to magnetic and nonmagnetic perturbations |
title_fullStr | Response of atomic spin-based sensors to magnetic and nonmagnetic perturbations |
title_full_unstemmed | Response of atomic spin-based sensors to magnetic and nonmagnetic perturbations |
title_short | Response of atomic spin-based sensors to magnetic and nonmagnetic perturbations |
title_sort | response of atomic spin based sensors to magnetic and nonmagnetic perturbations |
url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03609-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mikhailpadniuk responseofatomicspinbasedsensorstomagneticandnonmagneticperturbations AT marekkopciuch responseofatomicspinbasedsensorstomagneticandnonmagneticperturbations AT riccardocipolletti responseofatomicspinbasedsensorstomagneticandnonmagneticperturbations AT arnewickenbrock responseofatomicspinbasedsensorstomagneticandnonmagneticperturbations AT dmitrybudker responseofatomicspinbasedsensorstomagneticandnonmagneticperturbations AT szymonpustelny responseofatomicspinbasedsensorstomagneticandnonmagneticperturbations |