A comparison between the Supreme laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube suction during spontaneous ventilation: A randomized prospective study
Background and Aims: The Supreme laryngeal mask airway (SLMA) and the laryngeal tube suction-disposable (LTS-D), both second-generation supraglottic airway devices, have a record of efficiency when used for airway management in mechanically ventilated patients, during general anesthesia. There is no...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2018;volume=34;issue=2;spage=182;epage=187;aulast=Somri |
| _version_ | 1819110123701796864 |
|---|---|
| author | Mostafa Somri Luis Gaitini Ibrahim Matter Naser Hawash Octavio Falcucci Gustavo Garcia Fornari Pedro Charco Mora Swaid Forat Sonia Vaida |
| author_facet | Mostafa Somri Luis Gaitini Ibrahim Matter Naser Hawash Octavio Falcucci Gustavo Garcia Fornari Pedro Charco Mora Swaid Forat Sonia Vaida |
| author_sort | Mostafa Somri |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background and Aims: The Supreme laryngeal mask airway (SLMA) and the laryngeal tube suction-disposable (LTS-D), both second-generation supraglottic airway devices, have a record of efficiency when used for airway management in mechanically ventilated patients, during general anesthesia. There is no published data comparing these two devices in patients breathing spontaneously during general anesthesia.
Material and Methods: Eighty patients with normal airways undergoing elective general anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation were randomized to airway management with a SLMA or LTS-D. Efficacy and adequacy of oxygenation and ventilation were compared.
Results: No cases of desaturation of oxygen saturation (SpO2) values of less than 95% occurred with either device. The mean difference for SpO2between the two devices (0.7%) has no clinical significance. Slight hypercapnia was noted with both devices to acceptable values during spontaneous ventilation.
Conclusions: Both SLMA and LTS-D are suitable and effective for airway management in patients breathing spontaneously during general anesthesia for minor surgery of short duration. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T03:36:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b7e3df8264d24f239fc5624fd304472d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0970-9185 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T03:36:43Z |
| publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology |
| spelling | doaj.art-b7e3df8264d24f239fc5624fd304472d2022-12-21T18:40:22ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology0970-91852018-01-0134218218710.4103/joacp.JOACP_24_17A comparison between the Supreme laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube suction during spontaneous ventilation: A randomized prospective studyMostafa SomriLuis GaitiniIbrahim MatterNaser HawashOctavio FalcucciGustavo Garcia FornariPedro Charco MoraSwaid ForatSonia VaidaBackground and Aims: The Supreme laryngeal mask airway (SLMA) and the laryngeal tube suction-disposable (LTS-D), both second-generation supraglottic airway devices, have a record of efficiency when used for airway management in mechanically ventilated patients, during general anesthesia. There is no published data comparing these two devices in patients breathing spontaneously during general anesthesia. Material and Methods: Eighty patients with normal airways undergoing elective general anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation were randomized to airway management with a SLMA or LTS-D. Efficacy and adequacy of oxygenation and ventilation were compared. Results: No cases of desaturation of oxygen saturation (SpO2) values of less than 95% occurred with either device. The mean difference for SpO2between the two devices (0.7%) has no clinical significance. Slight hypercapnia was noted with both devices to acceptable values during spontaneous ventilation. Conclusions: Both SLMA and LTS-D are suitable and effective for airway management in patients breathing spontaneously during general anesthesia for minor surgery of short duration.http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2018;volume=34;issue=2;spage=182;epage=187;aulast=SomriLaryngeal tube suctionspontaneous ventilationSupreme laryngeal mask airway |
| spellingShingle | Mostafa Somri Luis Gaitini Ibrahim Matter Naser Hawash Octavio Falcucci Gustavo Garcia Fornari Pedro Charco Mora Swaid Forat Sonia Vaida A comparison between the Supreme laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube suction during spontaneous ventilation: A randomized prospective study Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology Laryngeal tube suction spontaneous ventilation Supreme laryngeal mask airway |
| title | A comparison between the Supreme laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube suction during spontaneous ventilation: A randomized prospective study |
| title_full | A comparison between the Supreme laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube suction during spontaneous ventilation: A randomized prospective study |
| title_fullStr | A comparison between the Supreme laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube suction during spontaneous ventilation: A randomized prospective study |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparison between the Supreme laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube suction during spontaneous ventilation: A randomized prospective study |
| title_short | A comparison between the Supreme laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube suction during spontaneous ventilation: A randomized prospective study |
| title_sort | comparison between the supreme laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube suction during spontaneous ventilation a randomized prospective study |
| topic | Laryngeal tube suction spontaneous ventilation Supreme laryngeal mask airway |
| url | http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2018;volume=34;issue=2;spage=182;epage=187;aulast=Somri |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mostafasomri acomparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT luisgaitini acomparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT ibrahimmatter acomparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT naserhawash acomparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT octaviofalcucci acomparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT gustavogarciafornari acomparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT pedrocharcomora acomparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT swaidforat acomparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT soniavaida acomparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT mostafasomri comparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT luisgaitini comparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT ibrahimmatter comparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT naserhawash comparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT octaviofalcucci comparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT gustavogarciafornari comparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT pedrocharcomora comparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT swaidforat comparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy AT soniavaida comparisonbetweenthesupremelaryngealmaskairwayandthelaryngealtubesuctionduringspontaneousventilationarandomizedprospectivestudy |