Causal Effect Relationship in Medical Cases. An Old Problem in a New Scenario. Commentary to CJEU Judgment (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2017, N.W. & Others V. Sanofi Pasteur MSD & Others, Case C-621/15, EU:C:2017:484. Approbative Gloss

This commentary evaluates the problem in assessing the role of a causal connection between damage and the use of a defective medical product, specifically a vaccine. The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Sanofi Pasteur Case, which allowed the possibility of recogni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Agata Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska, Urszula Dorota Drozdowska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin 2021-08-01
Series:Review of European and Comparative Law
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.kul.pl/recl/article/view/12264
_version_ 1818883225262489600
author Agata Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska
Urszula Dorota Drozdowska
author_facet Agata Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska
Urszula Dorota Drozdowska
author_sort Agata Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska
collection DOAJ
description This commentary evaluates the problem in assessing the role of a causal connection between damage and the use of a defective medical product, specifically a vaccine. The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Sanofi Pasteur Case, which allowed the possibility of recognizing damage claims, even in cases where the prevailing scientific theory claims that there is no scientific evidence of a causal link between a vaccination and the disease, became a base for consideration. Consequently, procedural solutions (such as the standard of proof required, the admissibility of prima facie evidence reasoning and other solutions in cases of an uncertain causation) remain to be decided by national law. The authors assessed two legal systems: the French and Polish legal systems in the context of how to resolve these dilemmas and to describe the impact of the above-mentioned judgment on the case-law of French and Polish courts as regards the application of Directive 85/374/EEC. As a result, they concluded that the most important interpretative motive has become the individual interest of the vaccination’s victim as a consumer of medical services. It seems to be in accordance with Directive 85/374/EEC, which is motivated by the necessity of approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning the liability of the producer for damage caused by the defectiveness of his products. However, since the existing divergences may distort competition and affect the movement of goods within the common market and entail a differing degree of protection of the consumer against damage caused by a defective product to his health or property, in countries belonging to the European Union, the authors wonder how the commented judgment will affect the further development of consumers protection against defective vaccines.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T15:30:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b7e8120cd79e49a0bd71c6757970f93b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2545-384X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T15:30:16Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
record_format Article
series Review of European and Comparative Law
spelling doaj.art-b7e8120cd79e49a0bd71c6757970f93b2022-12-21T20:15:45ZengThe John Paul II Catholic University of LublinReview of European and Comparative Law2545-384X2021-08-0146310.31743/recl.12264Causal Effect Relationship in Medical Cases. An Old Problem in a New Scenario. Commentary to CJEU Judgment (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2017, N.W. & Others V. Sanofi Pasteur MSD & Others, Case C-621/15, EU:C:2017:484. Approbative GlossAgata Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska0Urszula Dorota Drozdowska1University of WrocławWydział Prawa, Uniwersytet w BiałymstokuThis commentary evaluates the problem in assessing the role of a causal connection between damage and the use of a defective medical product, specifically a vaccine. The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Sanofi Pasteur Case, which allowed the possibility of recognizing damage claims, even in cases where the prevailing scientific theory claims that there is no scientific evidence of a causal link between a vaccination and the disease, became a base for consideration. Consequently, procedural solutions (such as the standard of proof required, the admissibility of prima facie evidence reasoning and other solutions in cases of an uncertain causation) remain to be decided by national law. The authors assessed two legal systems: the French and Polish legal systems in the context of how to resolve these dilemmas and to describe the impact of the above-mentioned judgment on the case-law of French and Polish courts as regards the application of Directive 85/374/EEC. As a result, they concluded that the most important interpretative motive has become the individual interest of the vaccination’s victim as a consumer of medical services. It seems to be in accordance with Directive 85/374/EEC, which is motivated by the necessity of approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning the liability of the producer for damage caused by the defectiveness of his products. However, since the existing divergences may distort competition and affect the movement of goods within the common market and entail a differing degree of protection of the consumer against damage caused by a defective product to his health or property, in countries belonging to the European Union, the authors wonder how the commented judgment will affect the further development of consumers protection against defective vaccines.https://czasopisma.kul.pl/recl/article/view/12264uncertain causation, standard of proof, vaccine, damage, defective medical product
spellingShingle Agata Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska
Urszula Dorota Drozdowska
Causal Effect Relationship in Medical Cases. An Old Problem in a New Scenario. Commentary to CJEU Judgment (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2017, N.W. & Others V. Sanofi Pasteur MSD & Others, Case C-621/15, EU:C:2017:484. Approbative Gloss
Review of European and Comparative Law
uncertain causation, standard of proof, vaccine, damage, defective medical product
title Causal Effect Relationship in Medical Cases. An Old Problem in a New Scenario. Commentary to CJEU Judgment (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2017, N.W. & Others V. Sanofi Pasteur MSD & Others, Case C-621/15, EU:C:2017:484. Approbative Gloss
title_full Causal Effect Relationship in Medical Cases. An Old Problem in a New Scenario. Commentary to CJEU Judgment (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2017, N.W. & Others V. Sanofi Pasteur MSD & Others, Case C-621/15, EU:C:2017:484. Approbative Gloss
title_fullStr Causal Effect Relationship in Medical Cases. An Old Problem in a New Scenario. Commentary to CJEU Judgment (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2017, N.W. & Others V. Sanofi Pasteur MSD & Others, Case C-621/15, EU:C:2017:484. Approbative Gloss
title_full_unstemmed Causal Effect Relationship in Medical Cases. An Old Problem in a New Scenario. Commentary to CJEU Judgment (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2017, N.W. & Others V. Sanofi Pasteur MSD & Others, Case C-621/15, EU:C:2017:484. Approbative Gloss
title_short Causal Effect Relationship in Medical Cases. An Old Problem in a New Scenario. Commentary to CJEU Judgment (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2017, N.W. & Others V. Sanofi Pasteur MSD & Others, Case C-621/15, EU:C:2017:484. Approbative Gloss
title_sort causal effect relationship in medical cases an old problem in a new scenario commentary to cjeu judgment second chamber of 21 june 2017 n w others v sanofi pasteur msd others case c 621 15 eu c 2017 484 approbative gloss
topic uncertain causation, standard of proof, vaccine, damage, defective medical product
url https://czasopisma.kul.pl/recl/article/view/12264
work_keys_str_mv AT agatawnukiewiczkozłowska causaleffectrelationshipinmedicalcasesanoldprobleminanewscenariocommentarytocjeujudgmentsecondchamberof21june2017nwothersvsanofipasteurmsdotherscasec62115euc2017484approbativegloss
AT urszuladorotadrozdowska causaleffectrelationshipinmedicalcasesanoldprobleminanewscenariocommentarytocjeujudgmentsecondchamberof21june2017nwothersvsanofipasteurmsdotherscasec62115euc2017484approbativegloss