Pitfalls in Data Gathering to Assess Judiciaries
<p><em>This paper is divided into two parts plus some concluding remarks. The first one deals with some problems in comparing the number of judges, court personnel, and caseflow in European judiciaries. Data come from the Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) of the Council of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
International Association for Court Administration
2018-12-01
|
| Series: | International Journal for Court Administration |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.iacajournal.org/articles/278 |
| _version_ | 1811296396575244288 |
|---|---|
| author | Marco Fabri |
| author_facet | Marco Fabri |
| author_sort | Marco Fabri |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p><em>This paper is divided into two parts plus some concluding remarks. The first one deals with some problems in comparing the number of judges, court personnel, and caseflow in European judiciaries. Data come from the Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) of the Council of Europe. The second part deals with some pitfalls in the data gathering carried out by the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ) in the attempt to measure judicial independence and accountability. Each case study brings some hints, summed up in the concluding remarks, that may be useful to improve both exercises.</em><strong></strong></p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T05:48:46Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b7e880274af24b5f9be526e0321d8fa6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2156-7964 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T05:48:46Z |
| publishDate | 2018-12-01 |
| publisher | International Association for Court Administration |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal for Court Administration |
| spelling | doaj.art-b7e880274af24b5f9be526e0321d8fa62022-12-22T02:59:52ZengInternational Association for Court AdministrationInternational Journal for Court Administration2156-79642018-12-0193677510.18352/ijca.278240Pitfalls in Data Gathering to Assess JudiciariesMarco Fabri<p><em>This paper is divided into two parts plus some concluding remarks. The first one deals with some problems in comparing the number of judges, court personnel, and caseflow in European judiciaries. Data come from the Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) of the Council of Europe. The second part deals with some pitfalls in the data gathering carried out by the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ) in the attempt to measure judicial independence and accountability. Each case study brings some hints, summed up in the concluding remarks, that may be useful to improve both exercises.</em><strong></strong></p>https://www.iacajournal.org/articles/278Judicial Independence and Accountability, Measurement, Indicators, European Network for Councils of the Judiciary |
| spellingShingle | Marco Fabri Pitfalls in Data Gathering to Assess Judiciaries International Journal for Court Administration Judicial Independence and Accountability, Measurement, Indicators, European Network for Councils of the Judiciary |
| title | Pitfalls in Data Gathering to Assess Judiciaries |
| title_full | Pitfalls in Data Gathering to Assess Judiciaries |
| title_fullStr | Pitfalls in Data Gathering to Assess Judiciaries |
| title_full_unstemmed | Pitfalls in Data Gathering to Assess Judiciaries |
| title_short | Pitfalls in Data Gathering to Assess Judiciaries |
| title_sort | pitfalls in data gathering to assess judiciaries |
| topic | Judicial Independence and Accountability, Measurement, Indicators, European Network for Councils of the Judiciary |
| url | https://www.iacajournal.org/articles/278 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marcofabri pitfallsindatagatheringtoassessjudiciaries |