Myopia control in the 21st century: A review of optical methods (2000–2019)

Background: Without appropriate interventions, simple or low myopia can progressively get worse and lead to high myopia. Patients with high myopia are at a greater risk of developing retinal detachment, myopic macular degeneration, glaucoma and eventual blindness in some cases, and hence the reason...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tope R. Akinbinu, Kovin S. Naidoo, Samuel O. Wajuihian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2020-04-01
Series:African Vision and Eye Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://avehjournal.org/index.php/aveh/article/view/499
_version_ 1818963255087857664
author Tope R. Akinbinu
Kovin S. Naidoo
Samuel O. Wajuihian
author_facet Tope R. Akinbinu
Kovin S. Naidoo
Samuel O. Wajuihian
author_sort Tope R. Akinbinu
collection DOAJ
description Background: Without appropriate interventions, simple or low myopia can progressively get worse and lead to high myopia. Patients with high myopia are at a greater risk of developing retinal detachment, myopic macular degeneration, glaucoma and eventual blindness in some cases, and hence the reason for the global call for myopia control. Consequently, myopia in the 21st century is not only treated as a refractive error but an ocular disorder with potential negative consequences. Myopia control strategies include optical, pharmacological and behavioural methods. In this report, the effectiveness of optical methods of myopia control was reviewed. Aim: The aim of the review is to evaluate and summarise existing knowledge on myopia control and provide recommendations to guide future studies. Method: The review was conducted using online search engines including PubMed and Google Scholar. Articles published between 2000 and 2019 were included. Results: For the optical methods of myopia control, under-correction has been found to be largely ineffective. However, a recent study shows that myopic children without correction had slower myopia progression (−0.75 D) than fully corrected children (−1.04 D) indicating a 28% reduction. Evidence from various studies indicates that bifocals and progressive addition lenses are not as effective as soft dual focus contact lenses or extended depth of focus contact lenses. Clinical trials indicate that single vision rigid gas permeable lenses did not slow myopic progression. Peripheral defocus lenses and orthokeratology were found to be approximately 50% effective across studies reviewed. Conclusion: Peripheral defocus lenses and multifocal contact lens designs offer the most effective myopia control. Orthokeratology is equally effective but future designs should consider ways of minimising risks of complications with lens wear. More studies would be needed to better understand how under-corrected myopic eyes tend to progress faster, whereas myopic eyes without correction tend to progress slower. A holistic approach and combination of methods may offer the best form of myopia control in the 21st century considering the increase in near work activities and use of digital devices among the most vulnerable groups.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T12:42:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b8078909a1914b1782befc2d54ee87c5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2413-3183
2410-1516
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T12:42:18Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series African Vision and Eye Health
spelling doaj.art-b8078909a1914b1782befc2d54ee87c52022-12-21T19:40:25ZengAOSISAfrican Vision and Eye Health2413-31832410-15162020-04-01791e1e910.4102/aveh.v79i1.499418Myopia control in the 21st century: A review of optical methods (2000–2019)Tope R. Akinbinu0Kovin S. Naidoo1Samuel O. Wajuihian2Discipline of Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, DurbanDiscipline of Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; and, School of Optometry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaDiscipline of Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, DurbanBackground: Without appropriate interventions, simple or low myopia can progressively get worse and lead to high myopia. Patients with high myopia are at a greater risk of developing retinal detachment, myopic macular degeneration, glaucoma and eventual blindness in some cases, and hence the reason for the global call for myopia control. Consequently, myopia in the 21st century is not only treated as a refractive error but an ocular disorder with potential negative consequences. Myopia control strategies include optical, pharmacological and behavioural methods. In this report, the effectiveness of optical methods of myopia control was reviewed. Aim: The aim of the review is to evaluate and summarise existing knowledge on myopia control and provide recommendations to guide future studies. Method: The review was conducted using online search engines including PubMed and Google Scholar. Articles published between 2000 and 2019 were included. Results: For the optical methods of myopia control, under-correction has been found to be largely ineffective. However, a recent study shows that myopic children without correction had slower myopia progression (−0.75 D) than fully corrected children (−1.04 D) indicating a 28% reduction. Evidence from various studies indicates that bifocals and progressive addition lenses are not as effective as soft dual focus contact lenses or extended depth of focus contact lenses. Clinical trials indicate that single vision rigid gas permeable lenses did not slow myopic progression. Peripheral defocus lenses and orthokeratology were found to be approximately 50% effective across studies reviewed. Conclusion: Peripheral defocus lenses and multifocal contact lens designs offer the most effective myopia control. Orthokeratology is equally effective but future designs should consider ways of minimising risks of complications with lens wear. More studies would be needed to better understand how under-corrected myopic eyes tend to progress faster, whereas myopic eyes without correction tend to progress slower. A holistic approach and combination of methods may offer the best form of myopia control in the 21st century considering the increase in near work activities and use of digital devices among the most vulnerable groups.https://avehjournal.org/index.php/aveh/article/view/499myopia controlunder-correctionbifocalsprogressive addition lensescontact lensesorthokeratology
spellingShingle Tope R. Akinbinu
Kovin S. Naidoo
Samuel O. Wajuihian
Myopia control in the 21st century: A review of optical methods (2000–2019)
African Vision and Eye Health
myopia control
under-correction
bifocals
progressive addition lenses
contact lenses
orthokeratology
title Myopia control in the 21st century: A review of optical methods (2000–2019)
title_full Myopia control in the 21st century: A review of optical methods (2000–2019)
title_fullStr Myopia control in the 21st century: A review of optical methods (2000–2019)
title_full_unstemmed Myopia control in the 21st century: A review of optical methods (2000–2019)
title_short Myopia control in the 21st century: A review of optical methods (2000–2019)
title_sort myopia control in the 21st century a review of optical methods 2000 2019
topic myopia control
under-correction
bifocals
progressive addition lenses
contact lenses
orthokeratology
url https://avehjournal.org/index.php/aveh/article/view/499
work_keys_str_mv AT toperakinbinu myopiacontrolinthe21stcenturyareviewofopticalmethods20002019
AT kovinsnaidoo myopiacontrolinthe21stcenturyareviewofopticalmethods20002019
AT samuelowajuihian myopiacontrolinthe21stcenturyareviewofopticalmethods20002019