GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis.

<h4>Background</h4>The last international consensus on the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) recommends SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists for patients with clinical cardiovascular (CV) disease; metformin remains the first-line glucose lowering medication. Last studies suggested benef...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guillaume Grenet, Shams Ribault, Giao Bao Nguyen, Faustine Glais, Augustin Metge, Thomas Linet, Behrouz Kassai-Koupai, Catherine Cornu, Théodora Bejan-Angoulvant, Sylvie Erpeldinger, Rémy Boussageon, Aurore Gouraud, Fabrice Bonnet, Michel Cucherat, Philippe Moulin, François Gueyffier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217701
_version_ 1819142338435350528
author Guillaume Grenet
Shams Ribault
Giao Bao Nguyen
Faustine Glais
Augustin Metge
Thomas Linet
Behrouz Kassai-Koupai
Catherine Cornu
Théodora Bejan-Angoulvant
Sylvie Erpeldinger
Rémy Boussageon
Aurore Gouraud
Fabrice Bonnet
Michel Cucherat
Philippe Moulin
François Gueyffier
author_facet Guillaume Grenet
Shams Ribault
Giao Bao Nguyen
Faustine Glais
Augustin Metge
Thomas Linet
Behrouz Kassai-Koupai
Catherine Cornu
Théodora Bejan-Angoulvant
Sylvie Erpeldinger
Rémy Boussageon
Aurore Gouraud
Fabrice Bonnet
Michel Cucherat
Philippe Moulin
François Gueyffier
author_sort Guillaume Grenet
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>The last international consensus on the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) recommends SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists for patients with clinical cardiovascular (CV) disease; metformin remains the first-line glucose lowering medication. Last studies suggested beneficial effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, in secondary CV prevention. Recently, a potential benefit of SGLT-2 inhibitors in primary CV prevention also has been suggested. However, no comparison of all the new and the old hypoglycemic drugs is available on CV outcomes. We aimed to compare the effects of old and new hypoglycemic drugs in T2D, on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical trials. Randomized trials, blinded or not, assessing contemporary hypoglycemic drugs on mortality or MACE in patients with T2D, were searched for in Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov. References screening and data extraction were done by multiple observers. Each drug was analyzed according to its therapeutic class. A random Bayesian network meta-analysis model was used. The primary outcomes were overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and MACE. Severe adverse events and severe hypoglycemia were also recorded. 175,966 patients in 34 trials from 1970 to 2018 were included. No trials evaluating glinides or alpha glucosidase inhibitors were found. 17 trials included a majority of patients with previous cardiovascular history, 16 trials a majority of patients without. Compared to control, SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a decreased risk of overall mortality (OR = 0.84 [95% CrI: 0.74; 0.95]), SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists with a decreased risk of MACE (OR = 0.89 [95% CrI: 0.81; 0.98] and OR = 0.88 [95% CrI: 0.81; 0.95], respectively). Compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a decreased risk of overall mortality (OR = 0.82 [95% CrI: 0.69; 0.98]), GLP-1 agonists with a decreased risk of MACE (OR = 0.88 [95% CrI: 0.79; 0.99]). Insulin was also associated with an increased risk of MACE compared to GLP-1 agonists (OR = 1.19 [95% CrI: 1.01; 1.42]). Insulin and sulfonylureas were associated with an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia. In the trials including a majority of patients without previous CV history, the comparisons of SGLT-2 inhibitors, metformin and control did not showed significant differences on primary outcomes. We limited our analysis at the therapeutic class level.<h4>Conclusions</h4>SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists have the most beneficial effects, especially in T2D patients with previous CV diseases. Direct comparisons of SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists and metformin are needed, notably in primary CV prevention.<h4>Trial registration</h4>PROSPERO CRD42016043823.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T12:08:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b80e052c1b1248caae71b05d7b6683f6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T12:08:46Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-b80e052c1b1248caae71b05d7b6683f62022-12-21T18:26:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01146e021770110.1371/journal.pone.0217701GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis.Guillaume GrenetShams RibaultGiao Bao NguyenFaustine GlaisAugustin MetgeThomas LinetBehrouz Kassai-KoupaiCatherine CornuThéodora Bejan-AngoulvantSylvie ErpeldingerRémy BoussageonAurore GouraudFabrice BonnetMichel CucheratPhilippe MoulinFrançois Gueyffier<h4>Background</h4>The last international consensus on the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) recommends SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists for patients with clinical cardiovascular (CV) disease; metformin remains the first-line glucose lowering medication. Last studies suggested beneficial effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, in secondary CV prevention. Recently, a potential benefit of SGLT-2 inhibitors in primary CV prevention also has been suggested. However, no comparison of all the new and the old hypoglycemic drugs is available on CV outcomes. We aimed to compare the effects of old and new hypoglycemic drugs in T2D, on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical trials. Randomized trials, blinded or not, assessing contemporary hypoglycemic drugs on mortality or MACE in patients with T2D, were searched for in Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov. References screening and data extraction were done by multiple observers. Each drug was analyzed according to its therapeutic class. A random Bayesian network meta-analysis model was used. The primary outcomes were overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and MACE. Severe adverse events and severe hypoglycemia were also recorded. 175,966 patients in 34 trials from 1970 to 2018 were included. No trials evaluating glinides or alpha glucosidase inhibitors were found. 17 trials included a majority of patients with previous cardiovascular history, 16 trials a majority of patients without. Compared to control, SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a decreased risk of overall mortality (OR = 0.84 [95% CrI: 0.74; 0.95]), SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists with a decreased risk of MACE (OR = 0.89 [95% CrI: 0.81; 0.98] and OR = 0.88 [95% CrI: 0.81; 0.95], respectively). Compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a decreased risk of overall mortality (OR = 0.82 [95% CrI: 0.69; 0.98]), GLP-1 agonists with a decreased risk of MACE (OR = 0.88 [95% CrI: 0.79; 0.99]). Insulin was also associated with an increased risk of MACE compared to GLP-1 agonists (OR = 1.19 [95% CrI: 1.01; 1.42]). Insulin and sulfonylureas were associated with an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia. In the trials including a majority of patients without previous CV history, the comparisons of SGLT-2 inhibitors, metformin and control did not showed significant differences on primary outcomes. We limited our analysis at the therapeutic class level.<h4>Conclusions</h4>SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists have the most beneficial effects, especially in T2D patients with previous CV diseases. Direct comparisons of SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists and metformin are needed, notably in primary CV prevention.<h4>Trial registration</h4>PROSPERO CRD42016043823.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217701
spellingShingle Guillaume Grenet
Shams Ribault
Giao Bao Nguyen
Faustine Glais
Augustin Metge
Thomas Linet
Behrouz Kassai-Koupai
Catherine Cornu
Théodora Bejan-Angoulvant
Sylvie Erpeldinger
Rémy Boussageon
Aurore Gouraud
Fabrice Bonnet
Michel Cucherat
Philippe Moulin
François Gueyffier
GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
title GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis.
title_full GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis.
title_fullStr GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis.
title_short GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis.
title_sort glucose control safety efficacy in type 2 diabetes a systematic review and network meta analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217701
work_keys_str_mv AT guillaumegrenet glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT shamsribault glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT giaobaonguyen glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT faustineglais glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT augustinmetge glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT thomaslinet glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT behrouzkassaikoupai glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT catherinecornu glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT theodorabejanangoulvant glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT sylvieerpeldinger glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT remyboussageon glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT auroregouraud glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT fabricebonnet glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT michelcucherat glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT philippemoulin glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT francoisgueyffier glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis