GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis.
<h4>Background</h4>The last international consensus on the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) recommends SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists for patients with clinical cardiovascular (CV) disease; metformin remains the first-line glucose lowering medication. Last studies suggested benef...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217701 |
_version_ | 1819142338435350528 |
---|---|
author | Guillaume Grenet Shams Ribault Giao Bao Nguyen Faustine Glais Augustin Metge Thomas Linet Behrouz Kassai-Koupai Catherine Cornu Théodora Bejan-Angoulvant Sylvie Erpeldinger Rémy Boussageon Aurore Gouraud Fabrice Bonnet Michel Cucherat Philippe Moulin François Gueyffier |
author_facet | Guillaume Grenet Shams Ribault Giao Bao Nguyen Faustine Glais Augustin Metge Thomas Linet Behrouz Kassai-Koupai Catherine Cornu Théodora Bejan-Angoulvant Sylvie Erpeldinger Rémy Boussageon Aurore Gouraud Fabrice Bonnet Michel Cucherat Philippe Moulin François Gueyffier |
author_sort | Guillaume Grenet |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <h4>Background</h4>The last international consensus on the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) recommends SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists for patients with clinical cardiovascular (CV) disease; metformin remains the first-line glucose lowering medication. Last studies suggested beneficial effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, in secondary CV prevention. Recently, a potential benefit of SGLT-2 inhibitors in primary CV prevention also has been suggested. However, no comparison of all the new and the old hypoglycemic drugs is available on CV outcomes. We aimed to compare the effects of old and new hypoglycemic drugs in T2D, on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical trials. Randomized trials, blinded or not, assessing contemporary hypoglycemic drugs on mortality or MACE in patients with T2D, were searched for in Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov. References screening and data extraction were done by multiple observers. Each drug was analyzed according to its therapeutic class. A random Bayesian network meta-analysis model was used. The primary outcomes were overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and MACE. Severe adverse events and severe hypoglycemia were also recorded. 175,966 patients in 34 trials from 1970 to 2018 were included. No trials evaluating glinides or alpha glucosidase inhibitors were found. 17 trials included a majority of patients with previous cardiovascular history, 16 trials a majority of patients without. Compared to control, SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a decreased risk of overall mortality (OR = 0.84 [95% CrI: 0.74; 0.95]), SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists with a decreased risk of MACE (OR = 0.89 [95% CrI: 0.81; 0.98] and OR = 0.88 [95% CrI: 0.81; 0.95], respectively). Compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a decreased risk of overall mortality (OR = 0.82 [95% CrI: 0.69; 0.98]), GLP-1 agonists with a decreased risk of MACE (OR = 0.88 [95% CrI: 0.79; 0.99]). Insulin was also associated with an increased risk of MACE compared to GLP-1 agonists (OR = 1.19 [95% CrI: 1.01; 1.42]). Insulin and sulfonylureas were associated with an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia. In the trials including a majority of patients without previous CV history, the comparisons of SGLT-2 inhibitors, metformin and control did not showed significant differences on primary outcomes. We limited our analysis at the therapeutic class level.<h4>Conclusions</h4>SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists have the most beneficial effects, especially in T2D patients with previous CV diseases. Direct comparisons of SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists and metformin are needed, notably in primary CV prevention.<h4>Trial registration</h4>PROSPERO CRD42016043823. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T12:08:46Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b80e052c1b1248caae71b05d7b6683f6 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T12:08:46Z |
publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-b80e052c1b1248caae71b05d7b6683f62022-12-21T18:26:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01146e021770110.1371/journal.pone.0217701GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis.Guillaume GrenetShams RibaultGiao Bao NguyenFaustine GlaisAugustin MetgeThomas LinetBehrouz Kassai-KoupaiCatherine CornuThéodora Bejan-AngoulvantSylvie ErpeldingerRémy BoussageonAurore GouraudFabrice BonnetMichel CucheratPhilippe MoulinFrançois Gueyffier<h4>Background</h4>The last international consensus on the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) recommends SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists for patients with clinical cardiovascular (CV) disease; metformin remains the first-line glucose lowering medication. Last studies suggested beneficial effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, in secondary CV prevention. Recently, a potential benefit of SGLT-2 inhibitors in primary CV prevention also has been suggested. However, no comparison of all the new and the old hypoglycemic drugs is available on CV outcomes. We aimed to compare the effects of old and new hypoglycemic drugs in T2D, on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical trials. Randomized trials, blinded or not, assessing contemporary hypoglycemic drugs on mortality or MACE in patients with T2D, were searched for in Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov. References screening and data extraction were done by multiple observers. Each drug was analyzed according to its therapeutic class. A random Bayesian network meta-analysis model was used. The primary outcomes were overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and MACE. Severe adverse events and severe hypoglycemia were also recorded. 175,966 patients in 34 trials from 1970 to 2018 were included. No trials evaluating glinides or alpha glucosidase inhibitors were found. 17 trials included a majority of patients with previous cardiovascular history, 16 trials a majority of patients without. Compared to control, SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a decreased risk of overall mortality (OR = 0.84 [95% CrI: 0.74; 0.95]), SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists with a decreased risk of MACE (OR = 0.89 [95% CrI: 0.81; 0.98] and OR = 0.88 [95% CrI: 0.81; 0.95], respectively). Compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a decreased risk of overall mortality (OR = 0.82 [95% CrI: 0.69; 0.98]), GLP-1 agonists with a decreased risk of MACE (OR = 0.88 [95% CrI: 0.79; 0.99]). Insulin was also associated with an increased risk of MACE compared to GLP-1 agonists (OR = 1.19 [95% CrI: 1.01; 1.42]). Insulin and sulfonylureas were associated with an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia. In the trials including a majority of patients without previous CV history, the comparisons of SGLT-2 inhibitors, metformin and control did not showed significant differences on primary outcomes. We limited our analysis at the therapeutic class level.<h4>Conclusions</h4>SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists have the most beneficial effects, especially in T2D patients with previous CV diseases. Direct comparisons of SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists and metformin are needed, notably in primary CV prevention.<h4>Trial registration</h4>PROSPERO CRD42016043823.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217701 |
spellingShingle | Guillaume Grenet Shams Ribault Giao Bao Nguyen Faustine Glais Augustin Metge Thomas Linet Behrouz Kassai-Koupai Catherine Cornu Théodora Bejan-Angoulvant Sylvie Erpeldinger Rémy Boussageon Aurore Gouraud Fabrice Bonnet Michel Cucherat Philippe Moulin François Gueyffier GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis. PLoS ONE |
title | GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis. |
title_full | GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis. |
title_fullStr | GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis. |
title_full_unstemmed | GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis. |
title_short | GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis. |
title_sort | glucose control safety efficacy in type 2 diabetes a systematic review and network meta analysis |
url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guillaumegrenet glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT shamsribault glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT giaobaonguyen glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT faustineglais glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT augustinmetge glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT thomaslinet glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT behrouzkassaikoupai glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT catherinecornu glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT theodorabejanangoulvant glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT sylvieerpeldinger glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT remyboussageon glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT auroregouraud glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT fabricebonnet glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT michelcucherat glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT philippemoulin glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT francoisgueyffier glucosecontrolsafetyefficacyintype2diabetesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |