The current impact of incidental findings found during neuroimaging on neurologists' workloads.

<h4>Objective</h4>Neuroimaging is an important diagnostic tool in the assessment of neurological disease, but often unmasks Incidental Findings (IFs). The negative impacts of IFs, such as 'patient' anxiety, present neurologists with management dilemmas, largely due to the limit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas C Booth, Jennifer M Boyd-Ellison
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118155&type=printable
_version_ 1826586618006339584
author Thomas C Booth
Jennifer M Boyd-Ellison
author_facet Thomas C Booth
Jennifer M Boyd-Ellison
author_sort Thomas C Booth
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objective</h4>Neuroimaging is an important diagnostic tool in the assessment of neurological disease, but often unmasks Incidental Findings (IFs). The negative impacts of IFs, such as 'patient' anxiety, present neurologists with management dilemmas, largely due to the limited knowledge base surrounding the medical significance of these IFs. In particular, the lack of evidence-based clinical trials investigating the efficacy of treatments for subclinical IFs makes management protocols challenging. The objective was to determine the impact IFs may have on neurologists' workloads and healthcare budgets and to examine neurologists' concerns regarding the clinical management of these 'patients'.<h4>Methods</h4>Qualitative research based on constructivist grounded theory. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews of purposively sampled neurologists, coded, and concurrent comparative analysis performed. A substantive theory of the 'IF impacts' was developed after concept saturation.<h4>Results</h4>Neurologists managed the escalating workload caused by an increased number of referrals of 'patients' with IFs found during neuroimaging; however it was unclear whether this was sustainable in the future. Neurologists experienced IF management dilemmas and spent more time with 'patients' affected by anxiety. The lack of information provided to those undergoing neuroimaging by the referring clinician regarding the possibility of discovering IFs was highlighted.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The impact of IFs upon the neurologist, 'patient' and the health institution appeared considerable. Further research determining the natural history of subclinical IFs and the efficacy of intervention will help to alleviate these issues.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T03:12:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b8146557ab5846b99d12808ac52b16b3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-14T16:12:24Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-b8146557ab5846b99d12808ac52b16b32025-02-23T05:31:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01102e011815510.1371/journal.pone.0118155The current impact of incidental findings found during neuroimaging on neurologists' workloads.Thomas C BoothJennifer M Boyd-Ellison<h4>Objective</h4>Neuroimaging is an important diagnostic tool in the assessment of neurological disease, but often unmasks Incidental Findings (IFs). The negative impacts of IFs, such as 'patient' anxiety, present neurologists with management dilemmas, largely due to the limited knowledge base surrounding the medical significance of these IFs. In particular, the lack of evidence-based clinical trials investigating the efficacy of treatments for subclinical IFs makes management protocols challenging. The objective was to determine the impact IFs may have on neurologists' workloads and healthcare budgets and to examine neurologists' concerns regarding the clinical management of these 'patients'.<h4>Methods</h4>Qualitative research based on constructivist grounded theory. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews of purposively sampled neurologists, coded, and concurrent comparative analysis performed. A substantive theory of the 'IF impacts' was developed after concept saturation.<h4>Results</h4>Neurologists managed the escalating workload caused by an increased number of referrals of 'patients' with IFs found during neuroimaging; however it was unclear whether this was sustainable in the future. Neurologists experienced IF management dilemmas and spent more time with 'patients' affected by anxiety. The lack of information provided to those undergoing neuroimaging by the referring clinician regarding the possibility of discovering IFs was highlighted.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The impact of IFs upon the neurologist, 'patient' and the health institution appeared considerable. Further research determining the natural history of subclinical IFs and the efficacy of intervention will help to alleviate these issues.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118155&type=printable
spellingShingle Thomas C Booth
Jennifer M Boyd-Ellison
The current impact of incidental findings found during neuroimaging on neurologists' workloads.
PLoS ONE
title The current impact of incidental findings found during neuroimaging on neurologists' workloads.
title_full The current impact of incidental findings found during neuroimaging on neurologists' workloads.
title_fullStr The current impact of incidental findings found during neuroimaging on neurologists' workloads.
title_full_unstemmed The current impact of incidental findings found during neuroimaging on neurologists' workloads.
title_short The current impact of incidental findings found during neuroimaging on neurologists' workloads.
title_sort current impact of incidental findings found during neuroimaging on neurologists workloads
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118155&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT thomascbooth thecurrentimpactofincidentalfindingsfoundduringneuroimagingonneurologistsworkloads
AT jennifermboydellison thecurrentimpactofincidentalfindingsfoundduringneuroimagingonneurologistsworkloads
AT thomascbooth currentimpactofincidentalfindingsfoundduringneuroimagingonneurologistsworkloads
AT jennifermboydellison currentimpactofincidentalfindingsfoundduringneuroimagingonneurologistsworkloads