An AeroCom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice

Though many global aerosols models prognose surface deposition, only a few models have been used to directly simulate the radiative effect from black carbon (BC) deposition to snow and sea ice. Here, we apply aerosol deposition fields from 25 models contributing to two phases of the Aerosol Comparis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Jiao, M. G. Flanner, Y. Balkanski, S. E. Bauer, N. Bellouin, T. K. Berntsen, H. Bian, K. S. Carslaw, M. Chin, N. De Luca, T. Diehl, S. J. Ghan, T. Iversen, A. Kirkevåg, D. Koch, X. Liu, G. W. Mann, J. E. Penner, G. Pitari, M. Schulz, Ø. Seland, R. B. Skeie, S. D. Steenrod, P. Stier, T. Takemura, K. Tsigaridis, T. van Noije, Y. Yun, K. Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2014-03-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/2399/2014/acp-14-2399-2014.pdf
_version_ 1819085640718876672
author C. Jiao
M. G. Flanner
Y. Balkanski
S. E. Bauer
N. Bellouin
T. K. Berntsen
H. Bian
K. S. Carslaw
M. Chin
N. De Luca
T. Diehl
S. J. Ghan
T. Iversen
A. Kirkevåg
D. Koch
X. Liu
G. W. Mann
J. E. Penner
G. Pitari
M. Schulz
Ø. Seland
R. B. Skeie
S. D. Steenrod
P. Stier
T. Takemura
K. Tsigaridis
T. van Noije
Y. Yun
K. Zhang
author_facet C. Jiao
M. G. Flanner
Y. Balkanski
S. E. Bauer
N. Bellouin
T. K. Berntsen
H. Bian
K. S. Carslaw
M. Chin
N. De Luca
T. Diehl
S. J. Ghan
T. Iversen
A. Kirkevåg
D. Koch
X. Liu
G. W. Mann
J. E. Penner
G. Pitari
M. Schulz
Ø. Seland
R. B. Skeie
S. D. Steenrod
P. Stier
T. Takemura
K. Tsigaridis
T. van Noije
Y. Yun
K. Zhang
author_sort C. Jiao
collection DOAJ
description Though many global aerosols models prognose surface deposition, only a few models have been used to directly simulate the radiative effect from black carbon (BC) deposition to snow and sea ice. Here, we apply aerosol deposition fields from 25 models contributing to two phases of the Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) project to simulate and evaluate within-snow BC concentrations and radiative effect in the Arctic. We accomplish this by driving the offline land and sea ice components of the Community Earth System Model with different deposition fields and meteorological conditions from 2004 to 2009, during which an extensive field campaign of BC measurements in Arctic snow occurred. We find that models generally underestimate BC concentrations in snow in northern Russia and Norway, while overestimating BC amounts elsewhere in the Arctic. Although simulated BC distributions in snow are poorly correlated with measurements, mean values are reasonable. The multi-model mean (range) bias in BC concentrations, sampled over the same grid cells, snow depths, and months of measurements, are −4.4 (−13.2 to +10.7) ng g<sup>&minus;1</sup> for an earlier phase of AeroCom models (phase I), and +4.1 (−13.0 to +21.4) ng g<sup>&minus;1</sup> for a more recent phase of AeroCom models (phase II), compared to the observational mean of 19.2 ng g<sup>&minus;1</sup>. Factors determining model BC concentrations in Arctic snow include Arctic BC emissions, transport of extra-Arctic aerosols, precipitation, deposition efficiency of aerosols within the Arctic, and meltwater removal of particles in snow. Sensitivity studies show that the model–measurement evaluation is only weakly affected by meltwater scavenging efficiency because most measurements were conducted in non-melting snow. The Arctic (60–90&deg; N) atmospheric residence time for BC in phase II models ranges from 3.7 to 23.2 days, implying large inter-model variation in local BC deposition efficiency. Combined with the fact that most Arctic BC deposition originates from extra-Arctic emissions, these results suggest that aerosol removal processes are a leading source of variation in model performance. The multi-model mean (full range) of Arctic radiative effect from BC in snow is 0.15 (0.07–0.25) W m<sup>&minus;2</sup> and 0.18 (0.06–0.28) W m<sup>&minus;2</sup> in phase I and phase II models, respectively. After correcting for model biases relative to observed BC concentrations in different regions of the Arctic, we obtain a multi-model mean Arctic radiative effect of 0.17 W m<sup>&minus;2</sup> for the combined AeroCom ensembles. Finally, there is a high correlation between modeled BC concentrations sampled over the observational sites and the Arctic as a whole, indicating that the field campaign provided a reasonable sample of the Arctic.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T21:07:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b81cf411a84d4916a4e845bc1871278d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T21:07:34Z
publishDate 2014-03-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-b81cf411a84d4916a4e845bc1871278d2022-12-21T18:50:15ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242014-03-011452399241710.5194/acp-14-2399-2014An AeroCom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea iceC. Jiao0M. G. Flanner1Y. Balkanski2S. E. Bauer3N. Bellouin4T. K. Berntsen5H. Bian6K. S. Carslaw7M. Chin8N. De Luca9T. Diehl10S. J. Ghan11T. Iversen12A. Kirkevåg13D. Koch14X. Liu15G. W. Mann16J. E. Penner17G. Pitari18M. Schulz19Ø. Seland20R. B. Skeie21S. D. Steenrod22P. Stier23T. Takemura24K. Tsigaridis25T. van Noije26Y. Yun27K. Zhang28Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USADepartment of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USALaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, FranceCenter for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, USAMet Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UKDepartment of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, MD, USAInstitute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USADipartimento di Scienze Fisiche e Chimiche, Università degli Studi L'Aquila, Coppito, L'Aquila, ItalyNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USAPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USANorwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, NorwayNorwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, USAPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USAInstitute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKDepartment of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USADipartimento di Scienze Fisiche e Chimiche, Università degli Studi L'Aquila, Coppito, L'Aquila, ItalyNorwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, NorwayNorwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, NorwayCenter for International Climate and Environmental Research-Oslo (CICERO), Oslo, NorwayUniversity Space Research Association, MD, USADepartment of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKResearch Institute for Applied mechanics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanCenter for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, USARoyal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, the NetherlandsGeophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, NOAA, P.O. Box 308, Princeton, NJ, USAPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USAThough many global aerosols models prognose surface deposition, only a few models have been used to directly simulate the radiative effect from black carbon (BC) deposition to snow and sea ice. Here, we apply aerosol deposition fields from 25 models contributing to two phases of the Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) project to simulate and evaluate within-snow BC concentrations and radiative effect in the Arctic. We accomplish this by driving the offline land and sea ice components of the Community Earth System Model with different deposition fields and meteorological conditions from 2004 to 2009, during which an extensive field campaign of BC measurements in Arctic snow occurred. We find that models generally underestimate BC concentrations in snow in northern Russia and Norway, while overestimating BC amounts elsewhere in the Arctic. Although simulated BC distributions in snow are poorly correlated with measurements, mean values are reasonable. The multi-model mean (range) bias in BC concentrations, sampled over the same grid cells, snow depths, and months of measurements, are −4.4 (−13.2 to +10.7) ng g<sup>&minus;1</sup> for an earlier phase of AeroCom models (phase I), and +4.1 (−13.0 to +21.4) ng g<sup>&minus;1</sup> for a more recent phase of AeroCom models (phase II), compared to the observational mean of 19.2 ng g<sup>&minus;1</sup>. Factors determining model BC concentrations in Arctic snow include Arctic BC emissions, transport of extra-Arctic aerosols, precipitation, deposition efficiency of aerosols within the Arctic, and meltwater removal of particles in snow. Sensitivity studies show that the model–measurement evaluation is only weakly affected by meltwater scavenging efficiency because most measurements were conducted in non-melting snow. The Arctic (60–90&deg; N) atmospheric residence time for BC in phase II models ranges from 3.7 to 23.2 days, implying large inter-model variation in local BC deposition efficiency. Combined with the fact that most Arctic BC deposition originates from extra-Arctic emissions, these results suggest that aerosol removal processes are a leading source of variation in model performance. The multi-model mean (full range) of Arctic radiative effect from BC in snow is 0.15 (0.07–0.25) W m<sup>&minus;2</sup> and 0.18 (0.06–0.28) W m<sup>&minus;2</sup> in phase I and phase II models, respectively. After correcting for model biases relative to observed BC concentrations in different regions of the Arctic, we obtain a multi-model mean Arctic radiative effect of 0.17 W m<sup>&minus;2</sup> for the combined AeroCom ensembles. Finally, there is a high correlation between modeled BC concentrations sampled over the observational sites and the Arctic as a whole, indicating that the field campaign provided a reasonable sample of the Arctic.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/2399/2014/acp-14-2399-2014.pdf
spellingShingle C. Jiao
M. G. Flanner
Y. Balkanski
S. E. Bauer
N. Bellouin
T. K. Berntsen
H. Bian
K. S. Carslaw
M. Chin
N. De Luca
T. Diehl
S. J. Ghan
T. Iversen
A. Kirkevåg
D. Koch
X. Liu
G. W. Mann
J. E. Penner
G. Pitari
M. Schulz
Ø. Seland
R. B. Skeie
S. D. Steenrod
P. Stier
T. Takemura
K. Tsigaridis
T. van Noije
Y. Yun
K. Zhang
An AeroCom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title An AeroCom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice
title_full An AeroCom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice
title_fullStr An AeroCom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice
title_full_unstemmed An AeroCom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice
title_short An AeroCom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice
title_sort aerocom assessment of black carbon in arctic snow and sea ice
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/2399/2014/acp-14-2399-2014.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cjiao anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT mgflanner anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT ybalkanski anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT sebauer anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT nbellouin anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT tkberntsen anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT hbian anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT kscarslaw anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT mchin anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT ndeluca anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT tdiehl anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT sjghan anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT tiversen anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT akirkevag anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT dkoch anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT xliu anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT gwmann anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT jepenner anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT gpitari anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT mschulz anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT øseland anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT rbskeie anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT sdsteenrod anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT pstier anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT ttakemura anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT ktsigaridis anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT tvannoije anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT yyun anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT kzhang anaerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT cjiao aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT mgflanner aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT ybalkanski aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT sebauer aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT nbellouin aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT tkberntsen aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT hbian aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT kscarslaw aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT mchin aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT ndeluca aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT tdiehl aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT sjghan aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT tiversen aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT akirkevag aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT dkoch aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT xliu aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT gwmann aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT jepenner aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT gpitari aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT mschulz aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT øseland aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT rbskeie aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT sdsteenrod aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT pstier aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT ttakemura aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT ktsigaridis aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT tvannoije aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT yyun aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice
AT kzhang aerocomassessmentofblackcarboninarcticsnowandseaice