Estimating emissions of methane consistent with atmospheric measurements of methane and <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C of methane

<p>We have constructed an atmospheric inversion framework based on TM5-4DVAR to jointly assimilate measurements of methane and <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C</span> of methane in order to estimate source-specific methane emissi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Basu, X. Lan, E. Dlugokencky, S. Michel, S. Schwietzke, J. B. Miller, L. Bruhwiler, Y. Oh, P. P. Tans, F. Apadula, L. V. Gatti, A. Jordan, J. Necki, M. Sasakawa, S. Morimoto, T. Di Iorio, H. Lee, J. Arduini, G. Manca
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022-12-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/15351/2022/acp-22-15351-2022.pdf
Description
Summary:<p>We have constructed an atmospheric inversion framework based on TM5-4DVAR to jointly assimilate measurements of methane and <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C</span> of methane in order to estimate source-specific methane emissions. Here we present global emission estimates from this framework for the period 1999–2016. We assimilate a newly constructed, multi-agency database of <span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span> and <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C</span> measurements. We find that traditional <span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span>-only atmospheric inversions are unlikely to estimate emissions consistent with atmospheric <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C</span> data, and assimilating <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C</span> data is necessary to derive emissions consistent with both measurements. Our framework attributes ca. 85 % of the post-2007 growth in atmospheric methane to microbial sources, with about half of that coming from the tropics between 23.5<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> N and 23.5<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> S. This contradicts the attribution of the recent growth in the methane budget of the Global Carbon Project (GCP). We find that the GCP attribution is only consistent with our top-down estimate in the absence of <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C</span> data. We find that at global and continental scales, <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C</span> data can separate microbial from fossil methane emissions much better than <span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span> data alone, and at smaller scales this ability is limited by the current <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C</span> measurement coverage. Finally, we find that the largest uncertainty in using <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C</span> data to separate different methane source types comes from our knowledge of atmospheric chemistry, specifically the distribution of tropospheric chlorine and the isotopic discrimination of the methane sink.</p>
ISSN:1680-7316
1680-7324