Bioprospection in Brazil and Mexico, a new El Dorado?: Between the Instability of Practices and the Permanence of Representations

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;"><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small;"><span style="...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Geoffroy Filoche, Jean Foyer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional de Colombia 2011-01-01
Series:Mundo Amazónico
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/imanimundo/article/view/13661
_version_ 1819055995844820992
author Geoffroy Filoche
Jean Foyer
author_facet Geoffroy Filoche
Jean Foyer
author_sort Geoffroy Filoche
collection DOAJ
description <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;"><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US">Because of their exceptional biodiversity, Brazil and Mexico seemed to be the ideal candidates for the valorization of their genetic resources, as promoted by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). But almost twenty years after the Rio Conference, the actual results of this valorization are disappointing. It can be explained either by the slowness in adopting domestic laws translating the CBD or by the difficulties in controlling and regulating very complex and unstable practices and objects. This leads to put into question the pertinence of the CDB framework, along with its categories and mechanisms. In spite of the relative obsolescence of this framework and the emergence of new environmental issues, which appear as more important, the question of the access to genetic resources and their exploitation through contracts of bioprospection is still being debated because of the various symbolic issues at stake, such as national sovereignty and the defense of biological and cultural diversity.</span></span></p></p>
first_indexed 2024-12-21T13:16:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b8315deba23d40afbcf5daec08534dbb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2145-5074
2145-5082
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T13:16:23Z
publishDate 2011-01-01
publisher Universidad Nacional de Colombia
record_format Article
series Mundo Amazónico
spelling doaj.art-b8315deba23d40afbcf5daec08534dbb2022-12-21T19:02:43ZengUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaMundo Amazónico2145-50742145-50822011-01-0120174217268Bioprospection in Brazil and Mexico, a new El Dorado?: Between the Instability of Practices and the Permanence of RepresentationsGeoffroy Filoche0Jean Foyer1Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD -UR 199)Centre d'Analyse et d'Intervention sociologique. Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;"><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US">Because of their exceptional biodiversity, Brazil and Mexico seemed to be the ideal candidates for the valorization of their genetic resources, as promoted by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). But almost twenty years after the Rio Conference, the actual results of this valorization are disappointing. It can be explained either by the slowness in adopting domestic laws translating the CBD or by the difficulties in controlling and regulating very complex and unstable practices and objects. This leads to put into question the pertinence of the CDB framework, along with its categories and mechanisms. In spite of the relative obsolescence of this framework and the emergence of new environmental issues, which appear as more important, the question of the access to genetic resources and their exploitation through contracts of bioprospection is still being debated because of the various symbolic issues at stake, such as national sovereignty and the defense of biological and cultural diversity.</span></span></p></p>http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/imanimundo/article/view/13661bioprospecciónBrasilMéxicodiversidad biológicarecursos genéticos
spellingShingle Geoffroy Filoche
Jean Foyer
Bioprospection in Brazil and Mexico, a new El Dorado?: Between the Instability of Practices and the Permanence of Representations
Mundo Amazónico
bioprospección
Brasil
México
diversidad biológica
recursos genéticos
title Bioprospection in Brazil and Mexico, a new El Dorado?: Between the Instability of Practices and the Permanence of Representations
title_full Bioprospection in Brazil and Mexico, a new El Dorado?: Between the Instability of Practices and the Permanence of Representations
title_fullStr Bioprospection in Brazil and Mexico, a new El Dorado?: Between the Instability of Practices and the Permanence of Representations
title_full_unstemmed Bioprospection in Brazil and Mexico, a new El Dorado?: Between the Instability of Practices and the Permanence of Representations
title_short Bioprospection in Brazil and Mexico, a new El Dorado?: Between the Instability of Practices and the Permanence of Representations
title_sort bioprospection in brazil and mexico a new el dorado between the instability of practices and the permanence of representations
topic bioprospección
Brasil
México
diversidad biológica
recursos genéticos
url http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/imanimundo/article/view/13661
work_keys_str_mv AT geoffroyfiloche bioprospectioninbrazilandmexicoaneweldoradobetweentheinstabilityofpracticesandthepermanenceofrepresentations
AT jeanfoyer bioprospectioninbrazilandmexicoaneweldoradobetweentheinstabilityofpracticesandthepermanenceofrepresentations