The effects of an upper body conditioning stimulus on lower body post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE): a pilot study

Complex training where a high-load conditioning stimulus (CS) is performed prior to a biomechanically similar plyometric movement has been demonstrated to acutely enhance the performance of the plyometric movement in a phenomenon called post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE). Despite the pos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grant Laskin, Scott Talpey, Robert Gregory
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Universities Strength and Conditioning Association 2021-07-01
Series:International Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.iusca.org/index.php/Journal/article/view/64
_version_ 1818980459759009792
author Grant Laskin
Scott Talpey
Robert Gregory
author_facet Grant Laskin
Scott Talpey
Robert Gregory
author_sort Grant Laskin
collection DOAJ
description Complex training where a high-load conditioning stimulus (CS) is performed prior to a biomechanically similar plyometric movement has been demonstrated to acutely enhance the performance of the plyometric movement in a phenomenon called post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE). Despite the positive influence PAPE can have on power production, the abundance of research has only investigated PAPE locally while comparing biomechanically similar movements. The purpose of this study was to determine if a heavy barbell bench press could elicit PAPE in a lower body plyometric movement. Eight (n = 8) resistance-trained males performed one set of countermovement jumps (CMJs) before (pre-CS) and three sets of CMJs after (post-CS) a heavy bench press set. Changes in muscle activation, jump height, work, power output, and rate of force development (RFD) during the early (E-RFD) and late (L-RFD) stages were compared between pre-CS and post-CS. The level of significance was set at p < .05. There were no significant differences in muscle activation, jump height, work, power output, or E-RFD (p > .05). There was a significant increase in L-RFD between pre-CS and the final set of jumps post-CS (p = .01). These results suggest that an upper body CS may not influence PAPE in the lower body. However, pairing a high-load upper body exercise with a lower body plyometric does not seem disadvantageous, and could be implemented as a strategy to maximize workout time efficiency with proper fatigue management incorporation.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T17:15:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b8342a35c3e54ed098595c609c7f80be
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2634-2235
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T17:15:46Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher International Universities Strength and Conditioning Association
record_format Article
series International Journal of Strength and Conditioning
spelling doaj.art-b8342a35c3e54ed098595c609c7f80be2022-12-21T19:32:02ZengInternational Universities Strength and Conditioning AssociationInternational Journal of Strength and Conditioning2634-22352021-07-0111The effects of an upper body conditioning stimulus on lower body post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE): a pilot studyGrant Laskin0Scott TalpeyRobert Gregory1Florida State UniversitySouthern Connecticut State UniversityComplex training where a high-load conditioning stimulus (CS) is performed prior to a biomechanically similar plyometric movement has been demonstrated to acutely enhance the performance of the plyometric movement in a phenomenon called post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE). Despite the positive influence PAPE can have on power production, the abundance of research has only investigated PAPE locally while comparing biomechanically similar movements. The purpose of this study was to determine if a heavy barbell bench press could elicit PAPE in a lower body plyometric movement. Eight (n = 8) resistance-trained males performed one set of countermovement jumps (CMJs) before (pre-CS) and three sets of CMJs after (post-CS) a heavy bench press set. Changes in muscle activation, jump height, work, power output, and rate of force development (RFD) during the early (E-RFD) and late (L-RFD) stages were compared between pre-CS and post-CS. The level of significance was set at p < .05. There were no significant differences in muscle activation, jump height, work, power output, or E-RFD (p > .05). There was a significant increase in L-RFD between pre-CS and the final set of jumps post-CS (p = .01). These results suggest that an upper body CS may not influence PAPE in the lower body. However, pairing a high-load upper body exercise with a lower body plyometric does not seem disadvantageous, and could be implemented as a strategy to maximize workout time efficiency with proper fatigue management incorporation.https://journal.iusca.org/index.php/Journal/article/view/64bench presspowerrate of force developmentmuscle activationplyometric
spellingShingle Grant Laskin
Scott Talpey
Robert Gregory
The effects of an upper body conditioning stimulus on lower body post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE): a pilot study
International Journal of Strength and Conditioning
bench press
power
rate of force development
muscle activation
plyometric
title The effects of an upper body conditioning stimulus on lower body post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE): a pilot study
title_full The effects of an upper body conditioning stimulus on lower body post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE): a pilot study
title_fullStr The effects of an upper body conditioning stimulus on lower body post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE): a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed The effects of an upper body conditioning stimulus on lower body post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE): a pilot study
title_short The effects of an upper body conditioning stimulus on lower body post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE): a pilot study
title_sort effects of an upper body conditioning stimulus on lower body post activation performance enhancement pape a pilot study
topic bench press
power
rate of force development
muscle activation
plyometric
url https://journal.iusca.org/index.php/Journal/article/view/64
work_keys_str_mv AT grantlaskin theeffectsofanupperbodyconditioningstimulusonlowerbodypostactivationperformanceenhancementpapeapilotstudy
AT scotttalpey theeffectsofanupperbodyconditioningstimulusonlowerbodypostactivationperformanceenhancementpapeapilotstudy
AT robertgregory theeffectsofanupperbodyconditioningstimulusonlowerbodypostactivationperformanceenhancementpapeapilotstudy
AT grantlaskin effectsofanupperbodyconditioningstimulusonlowerbodypostactivationperformanceenhancementpapeapilotstudy
AT scotttalpey effectsofanupperbodyconditioningstimulusonlowerbodypostactivationperformanceenhancementpapeapilotstudy
AT robertgregory effectsofanupperbodyconditioningstimulusonlowerbodypostactivationperformanceenhancementpapeapilotstudy