Exploring Alternative Octane Specification Methods for Improved Gasoline Knock Resistance in Spark-Ignition Engines

Different octane specification methods were evaluated under rising ethanol blending volumes by adopting a refinery economics model to represent a region in the U.S. It was demonstrated that the traditional octane specification methods, such as the Anti-knock Index (AKI) used in the U.S., or the Rese...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amir F. N. Abdul-Manan, Gautam Kalghatgi, Hassan Babiker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmech.2018.00020/full
_version_ 1819022096807755776
author Amir F. N. Abdul-Manan
Gautam Kalghatgi
Hassan Babiker
author_facet Amir F. N. Abdul-Manan
Gautam Kalghatgi
Hassan Babiker
author_sort Amir F. N. Abdul-Manan
collection DOAJ
description Different octane specification methods were evaluated under rising ethanol blending volumes by adopting a refinery economics model to represent a region in the U.S. It was demonstrated that the traditional octane specification methods, such as the Anti-knock Index (AKI) used in the U.S., or the Research Octane Number (RON) and Motor Octane Number (MON) used in the EU, can lead to counterintuitive drop in octane sensitivity with increased availability of ethanol. This is undesirable for modern gasoline engines that require fuels with high RON and low MON, but it is a consequence of how a refinery reformulates the gasoline blendstock, resulting in more naphtha being used in the final composition. The use of a new specification method based on octane index (OI), with engine constant K = −1, internalizes the diminishing role that MON plays in modern engines, thus ensures that the desirable anti-knock quality is being met either through higher RON and/or higher sensitivity. Initial assessment suggests a potential engine efficiency benefit (~ 1.5%) to be gained simply by switching from an AKI-based specification method to an equivalent OI-based method.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T04:17:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b838234aa7e3437b8c40923f99b471d6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-3079
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T04:17:34Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
spelling doaj.art-b838234aa7e3437b8c40923f99b471d62022-12-21T19:16:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering2297-30792018-12-01410.3389/fmech.2018.00020406157Exploring Alternative Octane Specification Methods for Improved Gasoline Knock Resistance in Spark-Ignition EnginesAmir F. N. Abdul-Manan0Gautam Kalghatgi1Hassan Babiker2Saudi Aramco, Strategic Transport Analysis Team, Fuel Technology R&D, Research & Development Center, Dhahran, Saudi ArabiaSaudi Aramco, Fuel Technology R&D, Research & Development Center, Dhahran, Saudi ArabiaSaudi Aramco, Strategic Transport Analysis Team, Fuel Technology R&D, Research & Development Center, Dhahran, Saudi ArabiaDifferent octane specification methods were evaluated under rising ethanol blending volumes by adopting a refinery economics model to represent a region in the U.S. It was demonstrated that the traditional octane specification methods, such as the Anti-knock Index (AKI) used in the U.S., or the Research Octane Number (RON) and Motor Octane Number (MON) used in the EU, can lead to counterintuitive drop in octane sensitivity with increased availability of ethanol. This is undesirable for modern gasoline engines that require fuels with high RON and low MON, but it is a consequence of how a refinery reformulates the gasoline blendstock, resulting in more naphtha being used in the final composition. The use of a new specification method based on octane index (OI), with engine constant K = −1, internalizes the diminishing role that MON plays in modern engines, thus ensures that the desirable anti-knock quality is being met either through higher RON and/or higher sensitivity. Initial assessment suggests a potential engine efficiency benefit (~ 1.5%) to be gained simply by switching from an AKI-based specification method to an equivalent OI-based method.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmech.2018.00020/fulloctanespark-ignitionanti-knockgasolineefficiencyfuel specification
spellingShingle Amir F. N. Abdul-Manan
Gautam Kalghatgi
Hassan Babiker
Exploring Alternative Octane Specification Methods for Improved Gasoline Knock Resistance in Spark-Ignition Engines
Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
octane
spark-ignition
anti-knock
gasoline
efficiency
fuel specification
title Exploring Alternative Octane Specification Methods for Improved Gasoline Knock Resistance in Spark-Ignition Engines
title_full Exploring Alternative Octane Specification Methods for Improved Gasoline Knock Resistance in Spark-Ignition Engines
title_fullStr Exploring Alternative Octane Specification Methods for Improved Gasoline Knock Resistance in Spark-Ignition Engines
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Alternative Octane Specification Methods for Improved Gasoline Knock Resistance in Spark-Ignition Engines
title_short Exploring Alternative Octane Specification Methods for Improved Gasoline Knock Resistance in Spark-Ignition Engines
title_sort exploring alternative octane specification methods for improved gasoline knock resistance in spark ignition engines
topic octane
spark-ignition
anti-knock
gasoline
efficiency
fuel specification
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmech.2018.00020/full
work_keys_str_mv AT amirfnabdulmanan exploringalternativeoctanespecificationmethodsforimprovedgasolineknockresistanceinsparkignitionengines
AT gautamkalghatgi exploringalternativeoctanespecificationmethodsforimprovedgasolineknockresistanceinsparkignitionengines
AT hassanbabiker exploringalternativeoctanespecificationmethodsforimprovedgasolineknockresistanceinsparkignitionengines