Distribució de competències i reformes estatutàries
This article draws a comparison between the different provisions that dealwith the allocation of powers system definition of the amended statutes ofAutonomy. From the analysis of the different regulations we appreciate thatthe statutes of Catalonia, Andalusia and Aragon contain norms regardingthe fu...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Catalan |
| Published: |
Institut d'Estudis de l'Autogovern
2011-10-01
|
| Series: | Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www10.gencat.cat/drep/binaris/_reaf14_LopezBofill_tcm112-180561.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818873939729842176 |
|---|---|
| author | Hèctor López Bofill |
| author_facet | Hèctor López Bofill |
| author_sort | Hèctor López Bofill |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article draws a comparison between the different provisions that dealwith the allocation of powers system definition of the amended statutes ofAutonomy. From the analysis of the different regulations we appreciate thatthe statutes of Catalonia, Andalusia and Aragon contain norms regardingthe functional definition of competences. Nevertheless, in the case of theCatalan Statute, this provisions defining the allocation of powers system mustbe modulated according to the restricted adjudication of the decision 31/2010,ruled by the Constitutional Court, from June 28th. This decision would eventuallyhave an impact on the adjudication of the statutes of Autonomy’sprovisions of Andalusia and Aragon. Other amended statutes (such as thepassed in Valencia, Balearic Islands, Castilia-Leon, Extremadura and Navarra)do not change the previous competence framework through a general definition,be it because of the logic of the previous system was kept or, ashappened in the case of Navarra, because the statute’s rules were not amendedin this point. The study also analyzes a specific field in the powers allocatedbetween the State and the Autonomous Community (such as the regulationson professional associations). This allows to conclude that the moreambitious amendment of the statutes of Autonomy concerning the principlesof the competences framework do not have almost any remarkable effectin the state’s legislative powers and the scope of decisions adopted by theAutonomous Community powers. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-19T13:02:41Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b84047eea0aa4e9bb2b3951ceb68a8b2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1886-2632 |
| language | Catalan |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-19T13:02:41Z |
| publishDate | 2011-10-01 |
| publisher | Institut d'Estudis de l'Autogovern |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals |
| spelling | doaj.art-b84047eea0aa4e9bb2b3951ceb68a8b22022-12-21T20:20:12ZcatInstitut d'Estudis de l'AutogovernRevista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals1886-26322011-10-0114186232Distribució de competències i reformes estatutàriesHèctor López BofillThis article draws a comparison between the different provisions that dealwith the allocation of powers system definition of the amended statutes ofAutonomy. From the analysis of the different regulations we appreciate thatthe statutes of Catalonia, Andalusia and Aragon contain norms regardingthe functional definition of competences. Nevertheless, in the case of theCatalan Statute, this provisions defining the allocation of powers system mustbe modulated according to the restricted adjudication of the decision 31/2010,ruled by the Constitutional Court, from June 28th. This decision would eventuallyhave an impact on the adjudication of the statutes of Autonomy’sprovisions of Andalusia and Aragon. Other amended statutes (such as thepassed in Valencia, Balearic Islands, Castilia-Leon, Extremadura and Navarra)do not change the previous competence framework through a general definition,be it because of the logic of the previous system was kept or, ashappened in the case of Navarra, because the statute’s rules were not amendedin this point. The study also analyzes a specific field in the powers allocatedbetween the State and the Autonomous Community (such as the regulationson professional associations). This allows to conclude that the moreambitious amendment of the statutes of Autonomy concerning the principlesof the competences framework do not have almost any remarkable effectin the state’s legislative powers and the scope of decisions adopted by theAutonomous Community powers.http://www10.gencat.cat/drep/binaris/_reaf14_LopezBofill_tcm112-180561.pdfStatute of Autonomystatute amendmentConstitutionConstitutionalCourtexclusive competencesshared competencesexecutive competenceprofessional associations. |
| spellingShingle | Hèctor López Bofill Distribució de competències i reformes estatutàries Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals Statute of Autonomy statute amendment Constitution ConstitutionalCourt exclusive competences shared competences executive competence professional associations. |
| title | Distribució de competències i reformes estatutàries |
| title_full | Distribució de competències i reformes estatutàries |
| title_fullStr | Distribució de competències i reformes estatutàries |
| title_full_unstemmed | Distribució de competències i reformes estatutàries |
| title_short | Distribució de competències i reformes estatutàries |
| title_sort | distribucio de competencies i reformes estatutaries |
| topic | Statute of Autonomy statute amendment Constitution ConstitutionalCourt exclusive competences shared competences executive competence professional associations. |
| url | http://www10.gencat.cat/drep/binaris/_reaf14_LopezBofill_tcm112-180561.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hectorlopezbofill distribuciodecompetenciesireformesestatutaries |