Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: A living review protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Background: Researchers in evidence-based medicine cannot keep up with the amounts of both old and newly published primary research articles. Support for the early stages of the systematic review process – searching and screening studies for eligibility – is necessary because it is currently impossi...
Main Authors: | Lena Schmidt, Babatunde K. Olorisade, Luke A. McGuinness, James Thomas, Julian P. T. Higgins |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2020-06-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/9-210/v2 |
Similar Items
-
Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: Update of a living systematic review [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
by: Rebecca Elmore, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01) -
(Semi)automated approaches to data extraction for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in social sciences: A living review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Ashlee Noblin, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01) -
(Semi)automated approaches to data extraction for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in social sciences: A living review protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Amanda Legate, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Living HTA: Automating Health Economic Evaluation with R [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Wael Mohammed, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
(Semi)automated approaches to data extraction for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in social sciences: A living review [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Ashlee Noblin, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01)