Influence of airway management strategy on "no-flow-time" during an "Advanced life support course" for intensive care nurses – A single rescuer resuscitation manikin study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In 1999, the laryngeal tube (VBM Medizintechnik, Sulz, Germany) was introduced as a new supraglottic airway. It was designed to allow either spontaneous breathing or controlled ventilation during anaesthesia; additionally it may serv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bahr Jan, Torney Andreas, Steffen Tobias, Schultens Alexander, Bartels Utz, Wiese Christoph HR, Graf Bernhard M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-04-01
Series:BMC Emergency Medicine
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/8/4
_version_ 1818936305427415040
author Bahr Jan
Torney Andreas
Steffen Tobias
Schultens Alexander
Bartels Utz
Wiese Christoph HR
Graf Bernhard M
author_facet Bahr Jan
Torney Andreas
Steffen Tobias
Schultens Alexander
Bartels Utz
Wiese Christoph HR
Graf Bernhard M
author_sort Bahr Jan
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In 1999, the laryngeal tube (VBM Medizintechnik, Sulz, Germany) was introduced as a new supraglottic airway. It was designed to allow either spontaneous breathing or controlled ventilation during anaesthesia; additionally it may serve as an alternative to endotracheal intubation, or bag-mask ventilation during resuscitation. Several variations of this supraglottic airway exist. In our study, we compared ventilation with the laryngeal tube suction for single use (LTS-D) and a bag-mask device. One of the main points of the revised ERC 2005 guidelines is a low no-flow-time (NFT). The NFT is defined as the time during which no chest compression occurs. Traditionally during the first few minutes of resuscitation NFT is very high. We evaluated the hypothesis that utilization of the LTS-D could reduce the NFT compared to bag-mask ventilation (BMV) during simulated cardiac arrest in a single rescuer manikin study.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Participants were studied during a one day advanced life support (ALS) course. Two scenarios of arrhythmias requiring defibrillation were simulated in a manikin. One scenario required subjects to establish the airway with a LTS-D; alternatively, the second scenario required them to use BMV. The scenario duration was 430 seconds for the LTS-D scenario, and 420 seconds for the BMV scenario, respectively. Experienced ICU nurses were recruited as study subjects. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups first (LTS-D and BMV) to establish the airway. Endpoints were the total NFT during the scenario, the successful airway management using the respective device, and participants' preference of one of the two strategies for airway management.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Utilization of the LTS-D reduced NFT significantly (p < 0.01). Adherence to the time frame of ERC guidelines was 96% in the LTS-D group versus 30% in the BMV group. Two participants in the LTS-D group required more than one attempt to establish the LTS-D correctly. Once established, ventilation was effective in 100%. In a subjective evaluation all participants preferred the LTS-D over BMV to provide ventilation in a cardiac arrest scenario.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In our manikin study, NFT was reduced significantly when using LTS-D compared to BMV. During cardiac arrest, the LTS-D might be a good alternative to BMV for providing and maintaining a patent airway. For personnel not experienced in endotracheal intubation it seems to be a safe airway device in a manikin use.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-20T05:33:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b848bdf5a8d24132ab30d76e72577e30
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-227X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T05:33:57Z
publishDate 2008-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-b848bdf5a8d24132ab30d76e72577e302022-12-21T19:51:41ZengBMCBMC Emergency Medicine1471-227X2008-04-0181410.1186/1471-227X-8-4Influence of airway management strategy on "no-flow-time" during an "Advanced life support course" for intensive care nurses – A single rescuer resuscitation manikin studyBahr JanTorney AndreasSteffen TobiasSchultens AlexanderBartels UtzWiese Christoph HRGraf Bernhard M<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In 1999, the laryngeal tube (VBM Medizintechnik, Sulz, Germany) was introduced as a new supraglottic airway. It was designed to allow either spontaneous breathing or controlled ventilation during anaesthesia; additionally it may serve as an alternative to endotracheal intubation, or bag-mask ventilation during resuscitation. Several variations of this supraglottic airway exist. In our study, we compared ventilation with the laryngeal tube suction for single use (LTS-D) and a bag-mask device. One of the main points of the revised ERC 2005 guidelines is a low no-flow-time (NFT). The NFT is defined as the time during which no chest compression occurs. Traditionally during the first few minutes of resuscitation NFT is very high. We evaluated the hypothesis that utilization of the LTS-D could reduce the NFT compared to bag-mask ventilation (BMV) during simulated cardiac arrest in a single rescuer manikin study.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Participants were studied during a one day advanced life support (ALS) course. Two scenarios of arrhythmias requiring defibrillation were simulated in a manikin. One scenario required subjects to establish the airway with a LTS-D; alternatively, the second scenario required them to use BMV. The scenario duration was 430 seconds for the LTS-D scenario, and 420 seconds for the BMV scenario, respectively. Experienced ICU nurses were recruited as study subjects. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups first (LTS-D and BMV) to establish the airway. Endpoints were the total NFT during the scenario, the successful airway management using the respective device, and participants' preference of one of the two strategies for airway management.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Utilization of the LTS-D reduced NFT significantly (p < 0.01). Adherence to the time frame of ERC guidelines was 96% in the LTS-D group versus 30% in the BMV group. Two participants in the LTS-D group required more than one attempt to establish the LTS-D correctly. Once established, ventilation was effective in 100%. In a subjective evaluation all participants preferred the LTS-D over BMV to provide ventilation in a cardiac arrest scenario.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In our manikin study, NFT was reduced significantly when using LTS-D compared to BMV. During cardiac arrest, the LTS-D might be a good alternative to BMV for providing and maintaining a patent airway. For personnel not experienced in endotracheal intubation it seems to be a safe airway device in a manikin use.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/8/4
spellingShingle Bahr Jan
Torney Andreas
Steffen Tobias
Schultens Alexander
Bartels Utz
Wiese Christoph HR
Graf Bernhard M
Influence of airway management strategy on "no-flow-time" during an "Advanced life support course" for intensive care nurses – A single rescuer resuscitation manikin study
BMC Emergency Medicine
title Influence of airway management strategy on "no-flow-time" during an "Advanced life support course" for intensive care nurses – A single rescuer resuscitation manikin study
title_full Influence of airway management strategy on "no-flow-time" during an "Advanced life support course" for intensive care nurses – A single rescuer resuscitation manikin study
title_fullStr Influence of airway management strategy on "no-flow-time" during an "Advanced life support course" for intensive care nurses – A single rescuer resuscitation manikin study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of airway management strategy on "no-flow-time" during an "Advanced life support course" for intensive care nurses – A single rescuer resuscitation manikin study
title_short Influence of airway management strategy on "no-flow-time" during an "Advanced life support course" for intensive care nurses – A single rescuer resuscitation manikin study
title_sort influence of airway management strategy on no flow time during an advanced life support course for intensive care nurses a single rescuer resuscitation manikin study
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/8/4
work_keys_str_mv AT bahrjan influenceofairwaymanagementstrategyonnoflowtimeduringanadvancedlifesupportcourseforintensivecarenursesasinglerescuerresuscitationmanikinstudy
AT torneyandreas influenceofairwaymanagementstrategyonnoflowtimeduringanadvancedlifesupportcourseforintensivecarenursesasinglerescuerresuscitationmanikinstudy
AT steffentobias influenceofairwaymanagementstrategyonnoflowtimeduringanadvancedlifesupportcourseforintensivecarenursesasinglerescuerresuscitationmanikinstudy
AT schultensalexander influenceofairwaymanagementstrategyonnoflowtimeduringanadvancedlifesupportcourseforintensivecarenursesasinglerescuerresuscitationmanikinstudy
AT bartelsutz influenceofairwaymanagementstrategyonnoflowtimeduringanadvancedlifesupportcourseforintensivecarenursesasinglerescuerresuscitationmanikinstudy
AT wiesechristophhr influenceofairwaymanagementstrategyonnoflowtimeduringanadvancedlifesupportcourseforintensivecarenursesasinglerescuerresuscitationmanikinstudy
AT grafbernhardm influenceofairwaymanagementstrategyonnoflowtimeduringanadvancedlifesupportcourseforintensivecarenursesasinglerescuerresuscitationmanikinstudy