Diagnostic performance comparison of liquid-based preparation methods in thyroid FNAs

Introduction: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is recognized worldwide as the primary diagnostic method for evaluating thyroid nodules. Samples collected by FNA can be spread directly onto slides, prepared for cell blocks, or processed as liquid-based cytology. Advocates of the traditional smear techniq...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bahattin Erdoğan, Aral Karabağ, H Ahmet Kasap, Kısmet Çivi Çetin, Cengiz Bal, Gülay Şimşek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Cytology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcytol.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9371;year=2023;volume=40;issue=4;spage=184;epage=191;aulast=Erdoğan
_version_ 1797232770851799040
author Bahattin Erdoğan
Aral Karabağ
H Ahmet Kasap
Kısmet Çivi Çetin
Cengiz Bal
Gülay Şimşek
author_facet Bahattin Erdoğan
Aral Karabağ
H Ahmet Kasap
Kısmet Çivi Çetin
Cengiz Bal
Gülay Şimşek
author_sort Bahattin Erdoğan
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is recognized worldwide as the primary diagnostic method for evaluating thyroid nodules. Samples collected by FNA can be spread directly onto slides, prepared for cell blocks, or processed as liquid-based cytology. Advocates of the traditional smear technique emphasize that background material such as colloid, cell sequencing characteristics in cell clusters, and cellularity is important in cytological diagnosis. They state that these properties are not observed in liquid-based liquids. Liquid-based cytology techniques aim to provide standardized slides of homogeneous cellular smears with well-preserved cell morphology, producing more precise visualization, shorter interpretation time, and more reproducible results. This study aimed to investigate and compare the diagnostic performance of liquid-based thyroid FNA samples prepared with SurePath and Cytospin over the last 6 years. Methods: Patients who underwent ultrasound-guided FNA between January 2015 and December 2021 were included in the study. Cytology reports, pathology reports, and demographic information of the patients were collected from the Hospital Information Management System. The programs “SPSS for Windows 21” and “MedCalc Diagnostic Test Evaluation Calculator” were used for data analysis. Chi-square tests were used in crosstab analysis. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test, two proportions test, and the confidence interval tests were used to analyze the variables of the methods. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The study population comprised 4,855 patients, 83.8% female and 16.2% male. There were no statistical differences in age and gender distribution in the population of both methods. Nondiagnostic outcome rates were 11.2% for SurePath and 12.8% for Cytospin. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values for SurePath and Cytospin methods were determined as 58.57%, 98.28%, and 91.12% and 79.07%, 96.88%, and 94.03%, respectively. Conclusion: In our study, although the qualitative analytical results were slightly in favor of the cytospin method, we think both ways can be used safely, especially in hospitals where the clinics performing sampling activities are variable and many, as well as in pathology laboratories where the workload is intense.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T16:05:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b861b59a661c40178243f8a99ea3cfd1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0970-9371
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T16:05:34Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Cytology
spelling doaj.art-b861b59a661c40178243f8a99ea3cfd12024-04-01T05:55:07ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Cytology0970-93712023-01-0140418419110.4103/joc.joc_133_22Diagnostic performance comparison of liquid-based preparation methods in thyroid FNAsBahattin ErdoğanAral KarabağH Ahmet KasapKısmet Çivi ÇetinCengiz BalGülay ŞimşekIntroduction: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is recognized worldwide as the primary diagnostic method for evaluating thyroid nodules. Samples collected by FNA can be spread directly onto slides, prepared for cell blocks, or processed as liquid-based cytology. Advocates of the traditional smear technique emphasize that background material such as colloid, cell sequencing characteristics in cell clusters, and cellularity is important in cytological diagnosis. They state that these properties are not observed in liquid-based liquids. Liquid-based cytology techniques aim to provide standardized slides of homogeneous cellular smears with well-preserved cell morphology, producing more precise visualization, shorter interpretation time, and more reproducible results. This study aimed to investigate and compare the diagnostic performance of liquid-based thyroid FNA samples prepared with SurePath and Cytospin over the last 6 years. Methods: Patients who underwent ultrasound-guided FNA between January 2015 and December 2021 were included in the study. Cytology reports, pathology reports, and demographic information of the patients were collected from the Hospital Information Management System. The programs “SPSS for Windows 21” and “MedCalc Diagnostic Test Evaluation Calculator” were used for data analysis. Chi-square tests were used in crosstab analysis. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test, two proportions test, and the confidence interval tests were used to analyze the variables of the methods. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The study population comprised 4,855 patients, 83.8% female and 16.2% male. There were no statistical differences in age and gender distribution in the population of both methods. Nondiagnostic outcome rates were 11.2% for SurePath and 12.8% for Cytospin. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values for SurePath and Cytospin methods were determined as 58.57%, 98.28%, and 91.12% and 79.07%, 96.88%, and 94.03%, respectively. Conclusion: In our study, although the qualitative analytical results were slightly in favor of the cytospin method, we think both ways can be used safely, especially in hospitals where the clinics performing sampling activities are variable and many, as well as in pathology laboratories where the workload is intense.http://www.jcytol.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9371;year=2023;volume=40;issue=4;spage=184;epage=191;aulast=Erdoğanfine needle aspirationliquid-based cytologythyroid nodules
spellingShingle Bahattin Erdoğan
Aral Karabağ
H Ahmet Kasap
Kısmet Çivi Çetin
Cengiz Bal
Gülay Şimşek
Diagnostic performance comparison of liquid-based preparation methods in thyroid FNAs
Journal of Cytology
fine needle aspiration
liquid-based cytology
thyroid nodules
title Diagnostic performance comparison of liquid-based preparation methods in thyroid FNAs
title_full Diagnostic performance comparison of liquid-based preparation methods in thyroid FNAs
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance comparison of liquid-based preparation methods in thyroid FNAs
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance comparison of liquid-based preparation methods in thyroid FNAs
title_short Diagnostic performance comparison of liquid-based preparation methods in thyroid FNAs
title_sort diagnostic performance comparison of liquid based preparation methods in thyroid fnas
topic fine needle aspiration
liquid-based cytology
thyroid nodules
url http://www.jcytol.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9371;year=2023;volume=40;issue=4;spage=184;epage=191;aulast=Erdoğan
work_keys_str_mv AT bahattinerdogan diagnosticperformancecomparisonofliquidbasedpreparationmethodsinthyroidfnas
AT aralkarabag diagnosticperformancecomparisonofliquidbasedpreparationmethodsinthyroidfnas
AT hahmetkasap diagnosticperformancecomparisonofliquidbasedpreparationmethodsinthyroidfnas
AT kısmetcivicetin diagnosticperformancecomparisonofliquidbasedpreparationmethodsinthyroidfnas
AT cengizbal diagnosticperformancecomparisonofliquidbasedpreparationmethodsinthyroidfnas
AT gulaysimsek diagnosticperformancecomparisonofliquidbasedpreparationmethodsinthyroidfnas