Antropogenetic of art and literature. Interferences between aesthetics and technique philosophy

This paper aims to outline the preliminaries of an antropogenetic theory of literature and art. From a critique of the romantic perspective that opposed art to technique, the work develops a conception of literature as technique not reduced to an instrument, or to an indeterminate but finite set of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mariano Ernesto Mosquera
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata 2020-03-01
Series:Estudios de Teoría Literaria
Subjects:
Online Access:http://fh.mdp.edu.ar/revistas/index.php/etl/article/view/3441
_version_ 1818388351660589056
author Mariano Ernesto Mosquera
author_facet Mariano Ernesto Mosquera
author_sort Mariano Ernesto Mosquera
collection DOAJ
description This paper aims to outline the preliminaries of an antropogenetic theory of literature and art. From a critique of the romantic perspective that opposed art to technique, the work develops a conception of literature as technique not reduced to an instrument, or to an indeterminate but finite set of procedures. Literature is a technical object, a co-individuating transformation of subject and object, life and language. Art as technique implies, in the same gesture, subjectivity as operation, its place in mechanisms of power and its eminently unfundamented condition. This proposal aims to create new spaces of theoretical discussion in the emerging digital humanities.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T04:24:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b8670a4afc0c4f569fd638ece213be73
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2313-9676
language Spanish
last_indexed 2024-12-14T04:24:28Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata
record_format Article
series Estudios de Teoría Literaria
spelling doaj.art-b8670a4afc0c4f569fd638ece213be732022-12-21T23:17:13ZspaUniversidad Nacional de Mar del PlataEstudios de Teoría Literaria2313-96762020-03-019181781912929Antropogenetic of art and literature. Interferences between aesthetics and technique philosophyMariano Ernesto Mosquera0Universidad de Buenos Aires - CONICETThis paper aims to outline the preliminaries of an antropogenetic theory of literature and art. From a critique of the romantic perspective that opposed art to technique, the work develops a conception of literature as technique not reduced to an instrument, or to an indeterminate but finite set of procedures. Literature is a technical object, a co-individuating transformation of subject and object, life and language. Art as technique implies, in the same gesture, subjectivity as operation, its place in mechanisms of power and its eminently unfundamented condition. This proposal aims to create new spaces of theoretical discussion in the emerging digital humanities.http://fh.mdp.edu.ar/revistas/index.php/etl/article/view/3441técnicagilbert simondonwalter benjaminbiopolíticahumanidades digitales
spellingShingle Mariano Ernesto Mosquera
Antropogenetic of art and literature. Interferences between aesthetics and technique philosophy
Estudios de Teoría Literaria
técnica
gilbert simondon
walter benjamin
biopolítica
humanidades digitales
title Antropogenetic of art and literature. Interferences between aesthetics and technique philosophy
title_full Antropogenetic of art and literature. Interferences between aesthetics and technique philosophy
title_fullStr Antropogenetic of art and literature. Interferences between aesthetics and technique philosophy
title_full_unstemmed Antropogenetic of art and literature. Interferences between aesthetics and technique philosophy
title_short Antropogenetic of art and literature. Interferences between aesthetics and technique philosophy
title_sort antropogenetic of art and literature interferences between aesthetics and technique philosophy
topic técnica
gilbert simondon
walter benjamin
biopolítica
humanidades digitales
url http://fh.mdp.edu.ar/revistas/index.php/etl/article/view/3441
work_keys_str_mv AT marianoernestomosquera antropogeneticofartandliteratureinterferencesbetweenaestheticsandtechniquephilosophy