The Antiquarian and the Myth ofAntiquity: The Origins of Rome in Renaissance Thought, by Philip Jacks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Attempts to understand the history of archaeology must inevitably face the issue of origins; while historical consciousness is common to human society, studying the past through the detailed excavation, analysis, and acquisition of its material remains has until r...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ubiquity Press
1995-11-01
|
| Series: | Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
| Online Access: | http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/article/view/367 |
| _version_ | 1818481975132946432 |
|---|---|
| author | James E. Snead |
| author_facet | James E. Snead |
| author_sort | James E. Snead |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Attempts to understand the history of archaeology must inevitably
face the issue of origins; while historical consciousness is common to human society,
studying the past through the detailed excavation, analysis, and acquisition of its
material remains has until recent generations been largely the domain of European
society and its descendants. There is nothing inherently logical about this pursuit; the
evolution of archaeology as a way of knowing the past has specifIc historical roots and
antecedents in western society and needs to be understood in light of these
circumstances. The Renaissance is arguably the cultural hearth in which archaeology took
shape. Scholars of the age who seem to anticipate our own predilections. such as Cyriaco
D'Ancona, are usually to be found in introductory chapters of archaeological textbooks
immediately following Nabonidus of Babylon. Jacks takes a more contextual approach,
discussing the relationships between scholarship and society in Italy from the late
Medieval period through the 16th century. This is not a general history of antiquarian
thought during the Renaissance, nor is it a study of the work of a specific individual.
The author takes as his focus the changing perceptions of antiquity held by scholars of
the age, with particular emphasis on the construction and manipulation of images of
ancient Rome. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T11:42:09Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b877ce16ce6747668b2af4050dfd200f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1062-4740 2047-6930 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T11:42:09Z |
| publishDate | 1995-11-01 |
| publisher | Ubiquity Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
| spelling | doaj.art-b877ce16ce6747668b2af4050dfd200f2022-12-22T01:50:13ZengUbiquity PressBulletin of the History of Archaeology1062-47402047-69301995-11-0152262810.5334/bha.05208365The Antiquarian and the Myth ofAntiquity: The Origins of Rome in Renaissance Thought, by Philip Jacks, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeJames E. Snead0Institute of Archaeology University of California-Los AngelesAttempts to understand the history of archaeology must inevitably face the issue of origins; while historical consciousness is common to human society, studying the past through the detailed excavation, analysis, and acquisition of its material remains has until recent generations been largely the domain of European society and its descendants. There is nothing inherently logical about this pursuit; the evolution of archaeology as a way of knowing the past has specifIc historical roots and antecedents in western society and needs to be understood in light of these circumstances. The Renaissance is arguably the cultural hearth in which archaeology took shape. Scholars of the age who seem to anticipate our own predilections. such as Cyriaco D'Ancona, are usually to be found in introductory chapters of archaeological textbooks immediately following Nabonidus of Babylon. Jacks takes a more contextual approach, discussing the relationships between scholarship and society in Italy from the late Medieval period through the 16th century. This is not a general history of antiquarian thought during the Renaissance, nor is it a study of the work of a specific individual. The author takes as his focus the changing perceptions of antiquity held by scholars of the age, with particular emphasis on the construction and manipulation of images of ancient Rome.http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/article/view/367 |
| spellingShingle | James E. Snead The Antiquarian and the Myth ofAntiquity: The Origins of Rome in Renaissance Thought, by Philip Jacks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
| title | The Antiquarian and the Myth ofAntiquity: The Origins of Rome in
Renaissance Thought, by Philip Jacks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge |
| title_full | The Antiquarian and the Myth ofAntiquity: The Origins of Rome in
Renaissance Thought, by Philip Jacks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge |
| title_fullStr | The Antiquarian and the Myth ofAntiquity: The Origins of Rome in
Renaissance Thought, by Philip Jacks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Antiquarian and the Myth ofAntiquity: The Origins of Rome in
Renaissance Thought, by Philip Jacks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge |
| title_short | The Antiquarian and the Myth ofAntiquity: The Origins of Rome in
Renaissance Thought, by Philip Jacks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge |
| title_sort | antiquarian and the myth ofantiquity the origins of rome in renaissance thought by philip jacks cambridge university press cambridge |
| url | http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/article/view/367 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jamesesnead theantiquarianandthemythofantiquitytheoriginsofromeinrenaissancethoughtbyphilipjackscambridgeuniversitypresscambridge AT jamesesnead antiquarianandthemythofantiquitytheoriginsofromeinrenaissancethoughtbyphilipjackscambridgeuniversitypresscambridge |