An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’ From the perspective of transcendental philosophy
Abstract The main objective of this study is to analyze the Kantian ‘existence’ from the perspective of Wolf’s, Hume’s, and Islamic philosophers’ views on existence. Since Kant addresses ‘existence’ in Critique of Pure Reason in two positions, first in the transcendental analysis section in the ‘pur...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
2016-12-01
|
Series: | حکمت معاصر |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://wisdom.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2356_7e2f8a2a8cab46e4b842d0e9544d6161.pdf |
_version_ | 1828867753904177152 |
---|---|
author | Roohollah karim |
author_facet | Roohollah karim |
author_sort | Roohollah karim |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract
The main objective of this study is to analyze the Kantian ‘existence’ from the perspective of Wolf’s, Hume’s, and Islamic philosophers’ views on existence. Since Kant addresses ‘existence’ in Critique of Pure Reason in two positions, first in the transcendental analysis section in the ‘pure categories of understanding’, as a component of ‘direction’ category among the famous four categories, and again in transcendental dialectic in criticizing ontological argument, this paper aiming to provide a comprehensive and coherent explanation of these two positions, shows that Kant's transcendental dialectic, to avoid dogmatic idealism and skeptical idealism, appeals to the giveness of existence, influenced by Hume, to criticize the ontological argument, but in the transcendental analysis which is focused on our understanding of existence, considers, influenced by Wolf, existence as the degrees of our knowledge of propositions. Also establishing a basic equivalence between ‘the principality of existence in the transcendent philosophy’ and ‘the giveness of existence in Hume’s view’ and ‘the principality of quiddity and the abstractness of existence in Suhrawardi’s view’ and ‘its being subsidiary in Wolf’s approach’, this paper uses some conceptual tools to analyze ‘existence’ in transcendent philosophy and Illumination Wisdom and to explain ‘existence’ in Kant’ view. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-13T05:17:26Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b881da08486240e08493f07caaf4f47b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2383-0689 2383-0697 |
language | fas |
last_indexed | 2024-12-13T05:17:26Z |
publishDate | 2016-12-01 |
publisher | Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) |
record_format | Article |
series | حکمت معاصر |
spelling | doaj.art-b881da08486240e08493f07caaf4f47b2022-12-21T23:58:24ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)حکمت معاصر2383-06892383-06972016-12-016351742356An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’ From the perspective of transcendental philosophyRoohollah karim0Assistant Professor, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Roohollah.karimi@gmail.com.Abstract The main objective of this study is to analyze the Kantian ‘existence’ from the perspective of Wolf’s, Hume’s, and Islamic philosophers’ views on existence. Since Kant addresses ‘existence’ in Critique of Pure Reason in two positions, first in the transcendental analysis section in the ‘pure categories of understanding’, as a component of ‘direction’ category among the famous four categories, and again in transcendental dialectic in criticizing ontological argument, this paper aiming to provide a comprehensive and coherent explanation of these two positions, shows that Kant's transcendental dialectic, to avoid dogmatic idealism and skeptical idealism, appeals to the giveness of existence, influenced by Hume, to criticize the ontological argument, but in the transcendental analysis which is focused on our understanding of existence, considers, influenced by Wolf, existence as the degrees of our knowledge of propositions. Also establishing a basic equivalence between ‘the principality of existence in the transcendent philosophy’ and ‘the giveness of existence in Hume’s view’ and ‘the principality of quiddity and the abstractness of existence in Suhrawardi’s view’ and ‘its being subsidiary in Wolf’s approach’, this paper uses some conceptual tools to analyze ‘existence’ in transcendent philosophy and Illumination Wisdom and to explain ‘existence’ in Kant’ view.http://wisdom.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2356_7e2f8a2a8cab46e4b842d0e9544d6161.pdfKeywords: Immanuel KantChristian WolffDavid Humetranscendental philosophySuhrawardiEXISTENCE |
spellingShingle | Roohollah karim An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’ From the perspective of transcendental philosophy حکمت معاصر Keywords: Immanuel Kant Christian Wolff David Hume transcendental philosophy Suhrawardi EXISTENCE |
title | An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’
From the perspective of transcendental philosophy |
title_full | An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’
From the perspective of transcendental philosophy |
title_fullStr | An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’
From the perspective of transcendental philosophy |
title_full_unstemmed | An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’
From the perspective of transcendental philosophy |
title_short | An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’
From the perspective of transcendental philosophy |
title_sort | analysis of kantian existence from the perspective of transcendental philosophy |
topic | Keywords: Immanuel Kant Christian Wolff David Hume transcendental philosophy Suhrawardi EXISTENCE |
url | http://wisdom.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2356_7e2f8a2a8cab46e4b842d0e9544d6161.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roohollahkarim ananalysisofkantianexistencefromtheperspectiveoftranscendentalphilosophy AT roohollahkarim analysisofkantianexistencefromtheperspectiveoftranscendentalphilosophy |