An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’ From the perspective of transcendental philosophy

Abstract The main objective of this study is to analyze the Kantian ‘existence’ from the perspective of Wolf’s, Hume’s, and Islamic philosophers’ views on existence. Since Kant addresses ‘existence’ in Critique of Pure Reason in two positions, first in the transcendental analysis section in the ‘pur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roohollah karim
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) 2016-12-01
Series:حکمت معاصر
Subjects:
Online Access:http://wisdom.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2356_7e2f8a2a8cab46e4b842d0e9544d6161.pdf
_version_ 1828867753904177152
author Roohollah karim
author_facet Roohollah karim
author_sort Roohollah karim
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The main objective of this study is to analyze the Kantian ‘existence’ from the perspective of Wolf’s, Hume’s, and Islamic philosophers’ views on existence. Since Kant addresses ‘existence’ in Critique of Pure Reason in two positions, first in the transcendental analysis section in the ‘pure categories of understanding’, as a component of ‘direction’ category among the famous four categories, and again in transcendental dialectic in criticizing ontological argument, this paper aiming to provide a comprehensive and coherent explanation of these two positions, shows that Kant's transcendental dialectic, to avoid dogmatic idealism and skeptical idealism, appeals to the giveness of existence, influenced by  Hume, to criticize the ontological argument, but in the transcendental analysis which is focused on our understanding of existence, considers, influenced by Wolf, existence as the degrees of our knowledge of propositions. Also establishing a basic equivalence between ‘the principality of existence in the transcendent philosophy’ and ‘the giveness of existence in Hume’s view’ and ‘the principality of quiddity and the abstractness of existence in Suhrawardi’s view’ and ‘its being subsidiary in Wolf’s approach’, this paper uses some conceptual tools to analyze ‘existence’ in transcendent philosophy and Illumination Wisdom and to explain ‘existence’ in Kant’ view.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T05:17:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b881da08486240e08493f07caaf4f47b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2383-0689
2383-0697
language fas
last_indexed 2024-12-13T05:17:26Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
record_format Article
series حکمت معاصر
spelling doaj.art-b881da08486240e08493f07caaf4f47b2022-12-21T23:58:24ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)حکمت معاصر2383-06892383-06972016-12-016351742356An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’ From the perspective of transcendental philosophyRoohollah karim0Assistant Professor, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Roohollah.karimi@gmail.com.Abstract The main objective of this study is to analyze the Kantian ‘existence’ from the perspective of Wolf’s, Hume’s, and Islamic philosophers’ views on existence. Since Kant addresses ‘existence’ in Critique of Pure Reason in two positions, first in the transcendental analysis section in the ‘pure categories of understanding’, as a component of ‘direction’ category among the famous four categories, and again in transcendental dialectic in criticizing ontological argument, this paper aiming to provide a comprehensive and coherent explanation of these two positions, shows that Kant's transcendental dialectic, to avoid dogmatic idealism and skeptical idealism, appeals to the giveness of existence, influenced by  Hume, to criticize the ontological argument, but in the transcendental analysis which is focused on our understanding of existence, considers, influenced by Wolf, existence as the degrees of our knowledge of propositions. Also establishing a basic equivalence between ‘the principality of existence in the transcendent philosophy’ and ‘the giveness of existence in Hume’s view’ and ‘the principality of quiddity and the abstractness of existence in Suhrawardi’s view’ and ‘its being subsidiary in Wolf’s approach’, this paper uses some conceptual tools to analyze ‘existence’ in transcendent philosophy and Illumination Wisdom and to explain ‘existence’ in Kant’ view.http://wisdom.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2356_7e2f8a2a8cab46e4b842d0e9544d6161.pdfKeywords: Immanuel KantChristian WolffDavid Humetranscendental philosophySuhrawardiEXISTENCE
spellingShingle Roohollah karim
An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’ From the perspective of transcendental philosophy
حکمت معاصر
Keywords: Immanuel Kant
Christian Wolff
David Hume
transcendental philosophy
Suhrawardi
EXISTENCE
title An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’ From the perspective of transcendental philosophy
title_full An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’ From the perspective of transcendental philosophy
title_fullStr An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’ From the perspective of transcendental philosophy
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’ From the perspective of transcendental philosophy
title_short An Analysis of Kantian ‘existence’ From the perspective of transcendental philosophy
title_sort analysis of kantian existence from the perspective of transcendental philosophy
topic Keywords: Immanuel Kant
Christian Wolff
David Hume
transcendental philosophy
Suhrawardi
EXISTENCE
url http://wisdom.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2356_7e2f8a2a8cab46e4b842d0e9544d6161.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT roohollahkarim ananalysisofkantianexistencefromtheperspectiveoftranscendentalphilosophy
AT roohollahkarim analysisofkantianexistencefromtheperspectiveoftranscendentalphilosophy