Management of Carotid Artery Injury in Endonasal Surgery

Abstract Introduction Carotid artery injury (CAI) is the most feared and potentially catastrophic intraoperative complication an endoscopic skull base surgeon may face. With the advancement of transnasal endoscopic surgery and the willingness to tackle more diverse pathology, evidence-b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vikram Padhye, Rowan Valentine, Peter-John Wormald
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2014-10-01
Series:International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0034-1395266
_version_ 1828335582148820992
author Vikram Padhye
Rowan Valentine
Peter-John Wormald
author_facet Vikram Padhye
Rowan Valentine
Peter-John Wormald
author_sort Vikram Padhye
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Carotid artery injury (CAI) is the most feared and potentially catastrophic intraoperative complication an endoscopic skull base surgeon may face. With the advancement of transnasal endoscopic surgery and the willingness to tackle more diverse pathology, evidence-based management of this life-threatening complication is paramount for patient safety and surgeon confidence. Objectives We review the current English literature surrounding the management of CAI during endoscopic transnasal surgery. Data Synthesis The searched databases included PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane database, LILACS, and BIREME. Keywords included “sinus surgery,” “carotid injury,” “endoscopic skull base surgery,” “hemostasis,” “transsphenoidal” and “pseudoaneurysm.” Conclusions Review of the literature found the incidence of CAI in endonasal skull base surgery to be as high as 9% in some surgeries. Furthermore, current treatment recommendations can result in damage to critical neurovascular structures. Management decisions must be made in the preoperative, operative, and postoperative setting to ensure adequate treatment of CAI and the prevention of its complications such as pseudoaneurysm. Emphasis should be placed on surgical competency, teamwork, and technical expertise through education and training.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T21:50:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b88f5fdbba084c7ab0b07ed982f1d9ba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1809-9777
1809-4864
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T21:50:23Z
publishDate 2014-10-01
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format Article
series International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
spelling doaj.art-b88f5fdbba084c7ab0b07ed982f1d9ba2022-12-22T02:28:27ZengThieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology1809-97771809-48642014-10-0118S173S17810.1055/s-0034-1395266Management of Carotid Artery Injury in Endonasal SurgeryVikram Padhye0Rowan Valentine1Peter-John Wormald2Department of Surgery - Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Surgery - Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Surgery - Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaAbstract Introduction Carotid artery injury (CAI) is the most feared and potentially catastrophic intraoperative complication an endoscopic skull base surgeon may face. With the advancement of transnasal endoscopic surgery and the willingness to tackle more diverse pathology, evidence-based management of this life-threatening complication is paramount for patient safety and surgeon confidence. Objectives We review the current English literature surrounding the management of CAI during endoscopic transnasal surgery. Data Synthesis The searched databases included PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane database, LILACS, and BIREME. Keywords included “sinus surgery,” “carotid injury,” “endoscopic skull base surgery,” “hemostasis,” “transsphenoidal” and “pseudoaneurysm.” Conclusions Review of the literature found the incidence of CAI in endonasal skull base surgery to be as high as 9% in some surgeries. Furthermore, current treatment recommendations can result in damage to critical neurovascular structures. Management decisions must be made in the preoperative, operative, and postoperative setting to ensure adequate treatment of CAI and the prevention of its complications such as pseudoaneurysm. Emphasis should be placed on surgical competency, teamwork, and technical expertise through education and training.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0034-1395266carotid injuryhemorrhagesinus surgeryendoscopic skull base surgery
spellingShingle Vikram Padhye
Rowan Valentine
Peter-John Wormald
Management of Carotid Artery Injury in Endonasal Surgery
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
carotid injury
hemorrhage
sinus surgery
endoscopic skull base surgery
title Management of Carotid Artery Injury in Endonasal Surgery
title_full Management of Carotid Artery Injury in Endonasal Surgery
title_fullStr Management of Carotid Artery Injury in Endonasal Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Management of Carotid Artery Injury in Endonasal Surgery
title_short Management of Carotid Artery Injury in Endonasal Surgery
title_sort management of carotid artery injury in endonasal surgery
topic carotid injury
hemorrhage
sinus surgery
endoscopic skull base surgery
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0034-1395266
work_keys_str_mv AT vikrampadhye managementofcarotidarteryinjuryinendonasalsurgery
AT rowanvalentine managementofcarotidarteryinjuryinendonasalsurgery
AT peterjohnwormald managementofcarotidarteryinjuryinendonasalsurgery