Radiographic evaluation of anatomical variables in maxilla and mandible in relation to dental implant placement

Introduction: Oral rehabilitation using implants is rapidly replacing tooth supported prostheses. The success of implants is largely dependent on the quality and quantity of alveolar bone. In this study, we assessed the location of limiting anatomical structures and the amount of alveolar bone avail...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Poornima Chandra, Poornima Govindaraju, Ramesh Chowdhary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2016;volume=27;issue=4;spage=344;epage=347;aulast=Chandra
_version_ 1818886529998651392
author Poornima Chandra
Poornima Govindaraju
Ramesh Chowdhary
author_facet Poornima Chandra
Poornima Govindaraju
Ramesh Chowdhary
author_sort Poornima Chandra
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Oral rehabilitation using implants is rapidly replacing tooth supported prostheses. The success of implants is largely dependent on the quality and quantity of alveolar bone. In this study, we assessed the location of limiting anatomical structures and the amount of alveolar bone available for implant placement. Materials and Method: Six hundred digital panoramic radiographs (300 males and 300 females) of dentate patients aged between 15-60 years were selected from the archives. The radiographs were subdivided into 3 groups with age interval of 15 years. Then the location of mental foramen, anterior loop, mandibular canal and maxillary sinus was determined. The amount of bone available was measured in both maxilla and mandible in the premolar and molar regions. Results: The mental foramen was most commonly located at the apex of the second premolar in both the genders. The anterior loop was more readily visible in the younger age group. The amount of bone available in the premolar and molar region of the mandible is nearly the same, while more bone is available in the premolar region of the maxilla. Conclusion: The location and morphology of anatomical structures of the jaws vary not only in different populations but also within the same population. The amount of bone available also showed variations in the same population and in the same individual on the right and left sides. The limiting anatomical structures govern the amount of bone available for possible implant placement.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T16:22:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b8a215d1d47c467c811c5caf38006dcf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0970-9290
1998-3603
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T16:22:48Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Dental Research
spelling doaj.art-b8a215d1d47c467c811c5caf38006dcf2022-12-21T20:14:26ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032016-01-0127434434710.4103/0970-9290.191878Radiographic evaluation of anatomical variables in maxilla and mandible in relation to dental implant placementPoornima ChandraPoornima GovindarajuRamesh ChowdharyIntroduction: Oral rehabilitation using implants is rapidly replacing tooth supported prostheses. The success of implants is largely dependent on the quality and quantity of alveolar bone. In this study, we assessed the location of limiting anatomical structures and the amount of alveolar bone available for implant placement. Materials and Method: Six hundred digital panoramic radiographs (300 males and 300 females) of dentate patients aged between 15-60 years were selected from the archives. The radiographs were subdivided into 3 groups with age interval of 15 years. Then the location of mental foramen, anterior loop, mandibular canal and maxillary sinus was determined. The amount of bone available was measured in both maxilla and mandible in the premolar and molar regions. Results: The mental foramen was most commonly located at the apex of the second premolar in both the genders. The anterior loop was more readily visible in the younger age group. The amount of bone available in the premolar and molar region of the mandible is nearly the same, while more bone is available in the premolar region of the maxilla. Conclusion: The location and morphology of anatomical structures of the jaws vary not only in different populations but also within the same population. The amount of bone available also showed variations in the same population and in the same individual on the right and left sides. The limiting anatomical structures govern the amount of bone available for possible implant placement.http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2016;volume=27;issue=4;spage=344;epage=347;aulast=ChandraAnterior loopdental implantsmandibular canalmaxillary sinusmental foramenpanoramic radiography
spellingShingle Poornima Chandra
Poornima Govindaraju
Ramesh Chowdhary
Radiographic evaluation of anatomical variables in maxilla and mandible in relation to dental implant placement
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Anterior loop
dental implants
mandibular canal
maxillary sinus
mental foramen
panoramic radiography
title Radiographic evaluation of anatomical variables in maxilla and mandible in relation to dental implant placement
title_full Radiographic evaluation of anatomical variables in maxilla and mandible in relation to dental implant placement
title_fullStr Radiographic evaluation of anatomical variables in maxilla and mandible in relation to dental implant placement
title_full_unstemmed Radiographic evaluation of anatomical variables in maxilla and mandible in relation to dental implant placement
title_short Radiographic evaluation of anatomical variables in maxilla and mandible in relation to dental implant placement
title_sort radiographic evaluation of anatomical variables in maxilla and mandible in relation to dental implant placement
topic Anterior loop
dental implants
mandibular canal
maxillary sinus
mental foramen
panoramic radiography
url http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2016;volume=27;issue=4;spage=344;epage=347;aulast=Chandra
work_keys_str_mv AT poornimachandra radiographicevaluationofanatomicalvariablesinmaxillaandmandibleinrelationtodentalimplantplacement
AT poornimagovindaraju radiographicevaluationofanatomicalvariablesinmaxillaandmandibleinrelationtodentalimplantplacement
AT rameshchowdhary radiographicevaluationofanatomicalvariablesinmaxillaandmandibleinrelationtodentalimplantplacement