Student-run free clinic volunteers: who they are and what we can learn from them
Abstract Background Initiatives employing medical students’ volunteerism and idealism, such as the Student-Run Free Clinics (SRFC) program, are prevalent in US medical schools. Many studies evaluated various aspects of volunteering, sometimes resulting in conflicting evidence. This study simultaneou...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2021-06-01
|
| Series: | BMC Medical Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02793-7 |
| _version_ | 1818928329933193216 |
|---|---|
| author | Fadi W. Adel Ruth E. Berggren Robert M. Esterl John T. Ratelle |
| author_facet | Fadi W. Adel Ruth E. Berggren Robert M. Esterl John T. Ratelle |
| author_sort | Fadi W. Adel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Initiatives employing medical students’ volunteerism and idealism, such as the Student-Run Free Clinics (SRFC) program, are prevalent in US medical schools. Many studies evaluated various aspects of volunteering, sometimes resulting in conflicting evidence. This study simultaneously sought to identify the characteristics of volunteers vs. non-volunteers, and to characterize the volunteers’ perception of the SRFC. Methods We administered a survey to the Long School of Medicine (LSOM) Class of 2018 before their third year of medical school. The authors compared and contrasted the findings of the SRFC volunteers with their non-volunteering counterparts by analyzing their demographics, volunteering history, academic performance, and clinical skills. The volunteers were also asked about their SRFC experiences. Results While most volunteers were female (62 %) and non-traditional students (67 %), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15 and p = 0.38, respectively). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in measures of academic performance (p = 0.25). Most of the volunteers learned about the SRFC program prior to starting medical school. Further, while SRFC volunteers were more likely to engage in additional local volunteering initiatives, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.03, prespecified α= 0.006). Importantly, volunteers agreed/strongly agreed that SRFC volunteering emphasized aspects that were missing or underemphasized in the formal medical school curriculum. Conclusions Medical students’ age, gender, undergraduate major, and non-traditional status were not statistically different between volunteers vs. non-volunteers. However, there may be tendencies for volunteers to be female, non-traditional, and locally engaged. Further, the timing of knowledge of the SRFC program may not affect student involvement in the SRFC, either. Most importantly, however, while volunteering does not affect the students’ academic performance, it may provide improvements in clinical competencies. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-20T03:27:11Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b8a5265b48424f3dae8782920dab2022 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1472-6920 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-20T03:27:11Z |
| publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Medical Education |
| spelling | doaj.art-b8a5265b48424f3dae8782920dab20222022-12-21T19:55:05ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202021-06-012111810.1186/s12909-021-02793-7Student-run free clinic volunteers: who they are and what we can learn from themFadi W. Adel0Ruth E. Berggren1Robert M. Esterl2John T. Ratelle3Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicThe Center for Medical Humanities and Ethics, The Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioThe Center for Medical Humanities and Ethics, The Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicAbstract Background Initiatives employing medical students’ volunteerism and idealism, such as the Student-Run Free Clinics (SRFC) program, are prevalent in US medical schools. Many studies evaluated various aspects of volunteering, sometimes resulting in conflicting evidence. This study simultaneously sought to identify the characteristics of volunteers vs. non-volunteers, and to characterize the volunteers’ perception of the SRFC. Methods We administered a survey to the Long School of Medicine (LSOM) Class of 2018 before their third year of medical school. The authors compared and contrasted the findings of the SRFC volunteers with their non-volunteering counterparts by analyzing their demographics, volunteering history, academic performance, and clinical skills. The volunteers were also asked about their SRFC experiences. Results While most volunteers were female (62 %) and non-traditional students (67 %), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15 and p = 0.38, respectively). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in measures of academic performance (p = 0.25). Most of the volunteers learned about the SRFC program prior to starting medical school. Further, while SRFC volunteers were more likely to engage in additional local volunteering initiatives, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.03, prespecified α= 0.006). Importantly, volunteers agreed/strongly agreed that SRFC volunteering emphasized aspects that were missing or underemphasized in the formal medical school curriculum. Conclusions Medical students’ age, gender, undergraduate major, and non-traditional status were not statistically different between volunteers vs. non-volunteers. However, there may be tendencies for volunteers to be female, non-traditional, and locally engaged. Further, the timing of knowledge of the SRFC program may not affect student involvement in the SRFC, either. Most importantly, however, while volunteering does not affect the students’ academic performance, it may provide improvements in clinical competencies.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02793-7Student Run Free ClinicVolunteersMedical EducationClinical SkillsUnderserved |
| spellingShingle | Fadi W. Adel Ruth E. Berggren Robert M. Esterl John T. Ratelle Student-run free clinic volunteers: who they are and what we can learn from them BMC Medical Education Student Run Free Clinic Volunteers Medical Education Clinical Skills Underserved |
| title | Student-run free clinic volunteers: who they are and what we can learn from them |
| title_full | Student-run free clinic volunteers: who they are and what we can learn from them |
| title_fullStr | Student-run free clinic volunteers: who they are and what we can learn from them |
| title_full_unstemmed | Student-run free clinic volunteers: who they are and what we can learn from them |
| title_short | Student-run free clinic volunteers: who they are and what we can learn from them |
| title_sort | student run free clinic volunteers who they are and what we can learn from them |
| topic | Student Run Free Clinic Volunteers Medical Education Clinical Skills Underserved |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02793-7 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fadiwadel studentrunfreeclinicvolunteerswhotheyareandwhatwecanlearnfromthem AT rutheberggren studentrunfreeclinicvolunteerswhotheyareandwhatwecanlearnfromthem AT robertmesterl studentrunfreeclinicvolunteerswhotheyareandwhatwecanlearnfromthem AT johntratelle studentrunfreeclinicvolunteerswhotheyareandwhatwecanlearnfromthem |