Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical Element

In this study, a 50 × 50 mm holographic optical element (HOE) with the property of a spherical mirror was recorded digitally on a silver halide photoplate using a wavefront printing method. It consisted of 51 × 96 hologram spots with each spot measuring 0.98 × 0.52 mm. The wavefronts and optical per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beom-Ryeol Lee, José Gil Marichal-Hernández, José Manuel Rodríguez-Ramos, Wook-Ho Son, Sunghee Hong, Jung-Young Son
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Micromachines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/14/6/1229
_version_ 1797593469049372672
author Beom-Ryeol Lee
José Gil Marichal-Hernández
José Manuel Rodríguez-Ramos
Wook-Ho Son
Sunghee Hong
Jung-Young Son
author_facet Beom-Ryeol Lee
José Gil Marichal-Hernández
José Manuel Rodríguez-Ramos
Wook-Ho Son
Sunghee Hong
Jung-Young Son
author_sort Beom-Ryeol Lee
collection DOAJ
description In this study, a 50 × 50 mm holographic optical element (HOE) with the property of a spherical mirror was recorded digitally on a silver halide photoplate using a wavefront printing method. It consisted of 51 × 96 hologram spots with each spot measuring 0.98 × 0.52 mm. The wavefronts and optical performance of the HOE were compared with those of reconstructed images from a point hologram displayed on DMDs of different pixel structures. The same comparison was also performed with an analog-type HOE for a heads-up display and with a spherical mirror. A Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor was used to measure the wavefronts of the diffracted beams from the digital HOE and the holograms as well as the reflected beam from the analog HOE and the mirror when a collimated beam was incident on them. These comparisons revealed that the digital HOE could perform as a spherical mirror, but they also revealed astigmatism—as in the reconstructed images from the holograms on DMDs—and that its focusability was worse than that of the analog HOE and the spherical mirror. A phase map, i.e., the polar coordinate-type presentation of the wavefront, could visualize the wavefront distortions more clearly than the reconstructed wavefronts obtained using Zernike polynomials. The phase map revealed that the wavefront of the digital HOE was more distorted than those of the analog HOE and the spherical mirror.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T02:09:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b8af55ff93ba461fadf52bad519913aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-666X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T02:09:36Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Micromachines
spelling doaj.art-b8af55ff93ba461fadf52bad519913aa2023-11-18T11:40:11ZengMDPI AGMicromachines2072-666X2023-06-01146122910.3390/mi14061229Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical ElementBeom-Ryeol Lee0José Gil Marichal-Hernández1José Manuel Rodríguez-Ramos2Wook-Ho Son3Sunghee Hong4Jung-Young Son5CG/Vision Section, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Daejeon 34129, Republic of KoreaIndustrial Engineering Department, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 La Laguna, SpainIndustrial Engineering Department, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 La Laguna, SpainCG/Vision Section, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Daejeon 34129, Republic of KoreaHologram Research Center, Korea Electronics Technology Institute, Seoul 03924, Republic of KoreaPublic Safety Research Center, Konyang University, Nonsan 32992, Republic of KoreaIn this study, a 50 × 50 mm holographic optical element (HOE) with the property of a spherical mirror was recorded digitally on a silver halide photoplate using a wavefront printing method. It consisted of 51 × 96 hologram spots with each spot measuring 0.98 × 0.52 mm. The wavefronts and optical performance of the HOE were compared with those of reconstructed images from a point hologram displayed on DMDs of different pixel structures. The same comparison was also performed with an analog-type HOE for a heads-up display and with a spherical mirror. A Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor was used to measure the wavefronts of the diffracted beams from the digital HOE and the holograms as well as the reflected beam from the analog HOE and the mirror when a collimated beam was incident on them. These comparisons revealed that the digital HOE could perform as a spherical mirror, but they also revealed astigmatism—as in the reconstructed images from the holograms on DMDs—and that its focusability was worse than that of the analog HOE and the spherical mirror. A phase map, i.e., the polar coordinate-type presentation of the wavefront, could visualize the wavefront distortions more clearly than the reconstructed wavefronts obtained using Zernike polynomials. The phase map revealed that the wavefront of the digital HOE was more distorted than those of the analog HOE and the spherical mirror.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/14/6/1229digital HOEoptical performancephase mapreconstructed wavefrontShack–Hartmann sensorZernike polynomials
spellingShingle Beom-Ryeol Lee
José Gil Marichal-Hernández
José Manuel Rodríguez-Ramos
Wook-Ho Son
Sunghee Hong
Jung-Young Son
Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical Element
Micromachines
digital HOE
optical performance
phase map
reconstructed wavefront
Shack–Hartmann sensor
Zernike polynomials
title Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical Element
title_full Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical Element
title_fullStr Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical Element
title_full_unstemmed Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical Element
title_short Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical Element
title_sort wavefront characteristics of a digital holographic optical element
topic digital HOE
optical performance
phase map
reconstructed wavefront
Shack–Hartmann sensor
Zernike polynomials
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/14/6/1229
work_keys_str_mv AT beomryeollee wavefrontcharacteristicsofadigitalholographicopticalelement
AT josegilmarichalhernandez wavefrontcharacteristicsofadigitalholographicopticalelement
AT josemanuelrodriguezramos wavefrontcharacteristicsofadigitalholographicopticalelement
AT wookhoson wavefrontcharacteristicsofadigitalholographicopticalelement
AT sungheehong wavefrontcharacteristicsofadigitalholographicopticalelement
AT jungyoungson wavefrontcharacteristicsofadigitalholographicopticalelement