Approaches to Preventing Intrapartum Fetal Injury

Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) was introduced into obstetric practice in 1970 as a test to identify early deterioration of fetal acid-base balance in the expectation that prompt intervention (“rescue”) would reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality. Clinical trials using a variety of visual or com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barry S. Schifrin, Brian J. Koos, Wayne R. Cohen, Mohamed Soliman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.915344/full
_version_ 1811266246578012160
author Barry S. Schifrin
Brian J. Koos
Brian J. Koos
Wayne R. Cohen
Mohamed Soliman
Mohamed Soliman
author_facet Barry S. Schifrin
Brian J. Koos
Brian J. Koos
Wayne R. Cohen
Mohamed Soliman
Mohamed Soliman
author_sort Barry S. Schifrin
collection DOAJ
description Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) was introduced into obstetric practice in 1970 as a test to identify early deterioration of fetal acid-base balance in the expectation that prompt intervention (“rescue”) would reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality. Clinical trials using a variety of visual or computer-based classifications and algorithms for intervention have failed repeatedly to demonstrate improved immediate or long-term outcomes with this technique, which has, however, contributed to an increased rate of operative deliveries (deemed “unnecessary”). In this review, we discuss the limitations of current classifications of FHR patterns and management guidelines based on them. We argue that these clinical and computer-based formulations pay too much attention to the detection of systemic fetal acidosis/hypoxia and too little attention not only to the pathophysiology of FHR patterns but to the provenance of fetal neurological injury and to the relationship of intrapartum injury to the condition of the newborn. Although they do not reliably predict fetal acidosis, FHR patterns, properly interpreted in the context of the clinical circumstances, do reliably identify fetal neurological integrity (behavior) and are a biomarker of fetal neurological injury (separate from asphyxia). They provide insight into the mechanisms and trajectory (evolution) of any hypoxic or ischemic threat to the fetus and have particular promise in signaling preventive measures (1) to enhance the outcome, (2) to reduce the frequency of “abnormal” FHR patterns that require urgent intervention, and (3) to inform the decision to provide neuroprotection to the newborn.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T20:38:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b8b8ab6da7184edebc49b4169979b884
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2360
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T20:38:37Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-b8b8ab6da7184edebc49b4169979b8842022-12-22T03:17:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602022-09-011010.3389/fped.2022.915344915344Approaches to Preventing Intrapartum Fetal InjuryBarry S. Schifrin0Brian J. Koos1Brian J. Koos2Wayne R. Cohen3Mohamed Soliman4Mohamed Soliman5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, United StatesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, United StatesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesElectronic fetal monitoring (EFM) was introduced into obstetric practice in 1970 as a test to identify early deterioration of fetal acid-base balance in the expectation that prompt intervention (“rescue”) would reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality. Clinical trials using a variety of visual or computer-based classifications and algorithms for intervention have failed repeatedly to demonstrate improved immediate or long-term outcomes with this technique, which has, however, contributed to an increased rate of operative deliveries (deemed “unnecessary”). In this review, we discuss the limitations of current classifications of FHR patterns and management guidelines based on them. We argue that these clinical and computer-based formulations pay too much attention to the detection of systemic fetal acidosis/hypoxia and too little attention not only to the pathophysiology of FHR patterns but to the provenance of fetal neurological injury and to the relationship of intrapartum injury to the condition of the newborn. Although they do not reliably predict fetal acidosis, FHR patterns, properly interpreted in the context of the clinical circumstances, do reliably identify fetal neurological integrity (behavior) and are a biomarker of fetal neurological injury (separate from asphyxia). They provide insight into the mechanisms and trajectory (evolution) of any hypoxic or ischemic threat to the fetus and have particular promise in signaling preventive measures (1) to enhance the outcome, (2) to reduce the frequency of “abnormal” FHR patterns that require urgent intervention, and (3) to inform the decision to provide neuroprotection to the newborn.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.915344/fullcardiotocographyexcessive uterine activityfetal compensatory responsesfetal monitoringfetal neurological injuryfetal hypoxia-ischemia
spellingShingle Barry S. Schifrin
Brian J. Koos
Brian J. Koos
Wayne R. Cohen
Mohamed Soliman
Mohamed Soliman
Approaches to Preventing Intrapartum Fetal Injury
Frontiers in Pediatrics
cardiotocography
excessive uterine activity
fetal compensatory responses
fetal monitoring
fetal neurological injury
fetal hypoxia-ischemia
title Approaches to Preventing Intrapartum Fetal Injury
title_full Approaches to Preventing Intrapartum Fetal Injury
title_fullStr Approaches to Preventing Intrapartum Fetal Injury
title_full_unstemmed Approaches to Preventing Intrapartum Fetal Injury
title_short Approaches to Preventing Intrapartum Fetal Injury
title_sort approaches to preventing intrapartum fetal injury
topic cardiotocography
excessive uterine activity
fetal compensatory responses
fetal monitoring
fetal neurological injury
fetal hypoxia-ischemia
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.915344/full
work_keys_str_mv AT barrysschifrin approachestopreventingintrapartumfetalinjury
AT brianjkoos approachestopreventingintrapartumfetalinjury
AT brianjkoos approachestopreventingintrapartumfetalinjury
AT waynercohen approachestopreventingintrapartumfetalinjury
AT mohamedsoliman approachestopreventingintrapartumfetalinjury
AT mohamedsoliman approachestopreventingintrapartumfetalinjury