Reducing errors in transition from acute stroke hospitalization to inpatient rehabilitation

Objective: Effective stroke care does not end with acute treatment during hospitalization, but extends through Objective: Effective stroke care does not end with acute treatment during hospitalization, but extends through rehabilitation and secondary stroke prevention. In transitions across care env...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chloe E Hill, Priya eVarma, David eLenrow, Raymond S Price, Scott E Kasner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fneur.2015.00227/full
_version_ 1828285052301082624
author Chloe E Hill
Priya eVarma
David eLenrow
Raymond S Price
Scott E Kasner
author_facet Chloe E Hill
Priya eVarma
David eLenrow
Raymond S Price
Scott E Kasner
author_sort Chloe E Hill
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Effective stroke care does not end with acute treatment during hospitalization, but extends through Objective: Effective stroke care does not end with acute treatment during hospitalization, but extends through rehabilitation and secondary stroke prevention. In transitions across care environments, stroke patients are vulnerable to errors in communication of diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to demonstrate that formalized communication between the neurology team and the rehabilitation medicine team would promote secondary stroke prevention and minimize interruptions during rehabilitation.Methods: The intervention was a standardized verbal handoff by phone between the discharging neurology resident and the admitting rehabilitation resident regarding each patient at transfer. This retrospective cohort study compared a pre-intervention control group (September 2012- February 2013) and a post-intervention group transferred with the handoff (September 2013- January 2014). The outcomes measured included errors in communication of stroke severity, stroke mechanism, medications, and recommended follow-up (appointments and tests) as well as emergent brain imaging, return to the acute care facility, and readmission.Results: The pre- and post-intervention groups were similar with respect to number of patients (50 vs. 52) and demographics including gender (52% vs. 54% female), age (65.8 vs. 64.0 years), severity of illness as measured by the NIHSS (10 vs. 6.5), and stroke type (84% vs. 77% ischemic). Implementation of the handoff decreased errors in communication of diagnosis (NIHSS 92% vs. 74%, p=0.02; stroke mechanism 54% vs. 30%, p=0.02). Furthermore, the handoff decreased the proportion with errors in reconciliation of critical medications (42% vs. 23%, p=0.04). However, the intervention did not significantly reduce interruptions of the rehabilitation program, such as emergent brain imaging (8% vs. 12%, p=0.55) or transfers back to the acute care hospital (26% vs. 21%, p=0.56). Conclusions: Standardized handoffs decreased errors in communication of diagnosis and critical medications for secondary stroke prevention.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T09:10:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b8b97d809e584bbba6f325c90f408874
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2295
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T09:10:16Z
publishDate 2015-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj.art-b8b97d809e584bbba6f325c90f4088742022-12-22T02:52:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952015-10-01610.3389/fneur.2015.00227167016Reducing errors in transition from acute stroke hospitalization to inpatient rehabilitationChloe E Hill0Priya eVarma1David eLenrow2Raymond S Price3Scott E Kasner4University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of PennsylvaniaUniversity of PennsylvaniaUniversity of PennsylvaniaUniversity of PennsylvaniaObjective: Effective stroke care does not end with acute treatment during hospitalization, but extends through Objective: Effective stroke care does not end with acute treatment during hospitalization, but extends through rehabilitation and secondary stroke prevention. In transitions across care environments, stroke patients are vulnerable to errors in communication of diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to demonstrate that formalized communication between the neurology team and the rehabilitation medicine team would promote secondary stroke prevention and minimize interruptions during rehabilitation.Methods: The intervention was a standardized verbal handoff by phone between the discharging neurology resident and the admitting rehabilitation resident regarding each patient at transfer. This retrospective cohort study compared a pre-intervention control group (September 2012- February 2013) and a post-intervention group transferred with the handoff (September 2013- January 2014). The outcomes measured included errors in communication of stroke severity, stroke mechanism, medications, and recommended follow-up (appointments and tests) as well as emergent brain imaging, return to the acute care facility, and readmission.Results: The pre- and post-intervention groups were similar with respect to number of patients (50 vs. 52) and demographics including gender (52% vs. 54% female), age (65.8 vs. 64.0 years), severity of illness as measured by the NIHSS (10 vs. 6.5), and stroke type (84% vs. 77% ischemic). Implementation of the handoff decreased errors in communication of diagnosis (NIHSS 92% vs. 74%, p=0.02; stroke mechanism 54% vs. 30%, p=0.02). Furthermore, the handoff decreased the proportion with errors in reconciliation of critical medications (42% vs. 23%, p=0.04). However, the intervention did not significantly reduce interruptions of the rehabilitation program, such as emergent brain imaging (8% vs. 12%, p=0.55) or transfers back to the acute care hospital (26% vs. 21%, p=0.56). Conclusions: Standardized handoffs decreased errors in communication of diagnosis and critical medications for secondary stroke prevention.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fneur.2015.00227/fullMedication ErrorsQuality ImprovementRehabilitationStrokeTransitions of care
spellingShingle Chloe E Hill
Priya eVarma
David eLenrow
Raymond S Price
Scott E Kasner
Reducing errors in transition from acute stroke hospitalization to inpatient rehabilitation
Frontiers in Neurology
Medication Errors
Quality Improvement
Rehabilitation
Stroke
Transitions of care
title Reducing errors in transition from acute stroke hospitalization to inpatient rehabilitation
title_full Reducing errors in transition from acute stroke hospitalization to inpatient rehabilitation
title_fullStr Reducing errors in transition from acute stroke hospitalization to inpatient rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Reducing errors in transition from acute stroke hospitalization to inpatient rehabilitation
title_short Reducing errors in transition from acute stroke hospitalization to inpatient rehabilitation
title_sort reducing errors in transition from acute stroke hospitalization to inpatient rehabilitation
topic Medication Errors
Quality Improvement
Rehabilitation
Stroke
Transitions of care
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fneur.2015.00227/full
work_keys_str_mv AT chloeehill reducingerrorsintransitionfromacutestrokehospitalizationtoinpatientrehabilitation
AT priyaevarma reducingerrorsintransitionfromacutestrokehospitalizationtoinpatientrehabilitation
AT davidelenrow reducingerrorsintransitionfromacutestrokehospitalizationtoinpatientrehabilitation
AT raymondsprice reducingerrorsintransitionfromacutestrokehospitalizationtoinpatientrehabilitation
AT scottekasner reducingerrorsintransitionfromacutestrokehospitalizationtoinpatientrehabilitation