“Smenovekhovtsy” Movement and Realities of Soviet Society of 1920-ies

The issues linked with the emergence of “smenovekhovtsy” movement among the Russian emigration in the early 1920-ies are considered. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the key position of “smenovekhovtsy” ideology about the inevitable rebirth of the Bolshevik regime in conditions of implem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: V. N. Azarov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2018-06-01
Series:Научный диалог
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/831
_version_ 1826568541993697280
author V. N. Azarov
author_facet V. N. Azarov
author_sort V. N. Azarov
collection DOAJ
description The issues linked with the emergence of “smenovekhovtsy” movement among the Russian emigration in the early 1920-ies are considered. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the key position of “smenovekhovtsy” ideology about the inevitable rebirth of the Bolshevik regime in conditions of implementation of the new economic policy (NEP). The author dwells on the reasons for the formation of “smenovekhovtsy” ideas about the future of the country. It is shown that these views did not correspond to the political and socio-economic realities of Soviet society in the 1920-ies. Attention is paid to the evaluation of “smenovekhovtsy” ideology in the light of political struggle in the administration of the Bolshevik party in the period under review. The question of the moral choice of the Russian intelligentsia is raised in connection with the question of the need for cooperation with the Bolsheviks raised by “smenovekhovtsy”. A review of the correspondence of the most famous ideologist of “smenovekhovtsy” N. V. Ustryalov with his personal friend N. A. Tsurikov is made. The author proceeds from the fact that this correspondence is one of the most striking examples of the depth and dramatic split among Russian immigrants in the 1920-ies. It is concluded that the illusory and erroneous ideas about the prospects of development of Soviet society became the cause of the tragic personal fate for many of “smenovekhovtsy” who returned home from exile and became the victims of Stalinist repression of the 1930-ies.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T04:32:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b8bc1e4d10a848339f4a8a9ff40173c4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2225-756X
2227-1295
language Russian
last_indexed 2025-03-14T11:25:05Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
record_format Article
series Научный диалог
spelling doaj.art-b8bc1e4d10a848339f4a8a9ff40173c42025-03-02T10:10:01ZrusTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovНаучный диалог2225-756X2227-12952018-06-010611412310.24224/2227-1295-2018-6-114-123827“Smenovekhovtsy” Movement and Realities of Soviet Society of 1920-iesV. N. Azarov0Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. YeltsinThe issues linked with the emergence of “smenovekhovtsy” movement among the Russian emigration in the early 1920-ies are considered. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the key position of “smenovekhovtsy” ideology about the inevitable rebirth of the Bolshevik regime in conditions of implementation of the new economic policy (NEP). The author dwells on the reasons for the formation of “smenovekhovtsy” ideas about the future of the country. It is shown that these views did not correspond to the political and socio-economic realities of Soviet society in the 1920-ies. Attention is paid to the evaluation of “smenovekhovtsy” ideology in the light of political struggle in the administration of the Bolshevik party in the period under review. The question of the moral choice of the Russian intelligentsia is raised in connection with the question of the need for cooperation with the Bolsheviks raised by “smenovekhovtsy”. A review of the correspondence of the most famous ideologist of “smenovekhovtsy” N. V. Ustryalov with his personal friend N. A. Tsurikov is made. The author proceeds from the fact that this correspondence is one of the most striking examples of the depth and dramatic split among Russian immigrants in the 1920-ies. It is concluded that the illusory and erroneous ideas about the prospects of development of Soviet society became the cause of the tragic personal fate for many of “smenovekhovtsy” who returned home from exile and became the victims of Stalinist repression of the 1930-ies.https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/831«сменовеховцы»“smenovekhovts”n. v. ustryalovnepbolshevik regimeemigrationthe intelligentsia
spellingShingle V. N. Azarov
“Smenovekhovtsy” Movement and Realities of Soviet Society of 1920-ies
Научный диалог
«сменовеховцы»
“smenovekhovts”
n. v. ustryalov
nep
bolshevik regime
emigration
the intelligentsia
title “Smenovekhovtsy” Movement and Realities of Soviet Society of 1920-ies
title_full “Smenovekhovtsy” Movement and Realities of Soviet Society of 1920-ies
title_fullStr “Smenovekhovtsy” Movement and Realities of Soviet Society of 1920-ies
title_full_unstemmed “Smenovekhovtsy” Movement and Realities of Soviet Society of 1920-ies
title_short “Smenovekhovtsy” Movement and Realities of Soviet Society of 1920-ies
title_sort smenovekhovtsy movement and realities of soviet society of 1920 ies
topic «сменовеховцы»
“smenovekhovts”
n. v. ustryalov
nep
bolshevik regime
emigration
the intelligentsia
url https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/831
work_keys_str_mv AT vnazarov smenovekhovtsymovementandrealitiesofsovietsocietyof1920ies