Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment
The aim of this research was to compare three methods to evaluate the availability of existent space in the mandible posterior segment; the methods are the Merrifield’s (1986), Ricketts’ (1976) and Richardson’s (1992). Sixty 60 teleradiographs in lateral pattern, from head, belonging to 60 Brazilian...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2015-11-01
|
Series: | Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641747 |
_version_ | 1818740110264369152 |
---|---|
author | Haroldo Amorin Almeida Maria Helena Castro Almeida João Sarmento Pereira-Neto Maria Beatriz Borges Araújo Stenyo Wanderley Tavares Fábio Lourenço Romano |
author_facet | Haroldo Amorin Almeida Maria Helena Castro Almeida João Sarmento Pereira-Neto Maria Beatriz Borges Araújo Stenyo Wanderley Tavares Fábio Lourenço Romano |
author_sort | Haroldo Amorin Almeida |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The aim of this research was to compare three methods to evaluate the availability of existent space in the mandible posterior segment; the methods are the Merrifield’s (1986), Ricketts’ (1976) and Richardson’s (1992). Sixty 60 teleradiographs in lateral pattern, from head, belonging to 60 Brazilian leucoderm subjects were evaluated. The age range from 9 to 19 years, all having a mal-occlusion of Class II, division 1, equally separated as for the gender (being 30 of male gender and 30 of female gender). It was concluded: Evidence of growing in the mandible arch posterior segment in the age range studied, with mean values of 10,21 mm for the Merrifield, 11,21 mm for the Richardson and 17,84 mm for the Ricketts methods. We have concluded that irrespective of the evaluated method, it was verified that the female gender has a more precocious growing (12,17 mm) as compared to the male gender (8,81 mm), in the ages 9 to 12. In the correlation between the employed methods, there was no a statistical difference among themselves by the t test, in the level of 1% (p £ 0,01). |
first_indexed | 2024-12-18T01:35:31Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b8deb81f35204b1596877dc5c1ea4193 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1677-3225 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-18T01:35:31Z |
publishDate | 2015-11-01 |
publisher | Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
record_format | Article |
series | Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-b8deb81f35204b1596877dc5c1ea41932022-12-21T21:25:29ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252015-11-013910.20396/bjos.v3i9.8641747Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segmentHaroldo Amorin Almeida0Maria Helena Castro Almeida1João Sarmento Pereira-Neto2Maria Beatriz Borges Araújo3Stenyo Wanderley Tavares4Fábio Lourenço Romano5Department of Orthodontics, University of CampinasDepartment of Orthodontics, University of CampinasDepartment of Orthodontics, University of CampinasDepartment of Orthodontics, University of CampinasDepartment of Orthodontics, University of CampinasDepartment of Orthodontics, University of CampinasThe aim of this research was to compare three methods to evaluate the availability of existent space in the mandible posterior segment; the methods are the Merrifield’s (1986), Ricketts’ (1976) and Richardson’s (1992). Sixty 60 teleradiographs in lateral pattern, from head, belonging to 60 Brazilian leucoderm subjects were evaluated. The age range from 9 to 19 years, all having a mal-occlusion of Class II, division 1, equally separated as for the gender (being 30 of male gender and 30 of female gender). It was concluded: Evidence of growing in the mandible arch posterior segment in the age range studied, with mean values of 10,21 mm for the Merrifield, 11,21 mm for the Richardson and 17,84 mm for the Ricketts methods. We have concluded that irrespective of the evaluated method, it was verified that the female gender has a more precocious growing (12,17 mm) as compared to the male gender (8,81 mm), in the ages 9 to 12. In the correlation between the employed methods, there was no a statistical difference among themselves by the t test, in the level of 1% (p £ 0,01).https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641747Orthodontics. Cephalometric. Diagnostic |
spellingShingle | Haroldo Amorin Almeida Maria Helena Castro Almeida João Sarmento Pereira-Neto Maria Beatriz Borges Araújo Stenyo Wanderley Tavares Fábio Lourenço Romano Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences Orthodontics. Cephalometric. Diagnostic |
title | Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment |
title_full | Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment |
title_fullStr | Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment |
title_short | Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment |
title_sort | methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment |
topic | Orthodontics. Cephalometric. Diagnostic |
url | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641747 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haroldoamorinalmeida methodsofevaluationofmandibleposteriorsegment AT mariahelenacastroalmeida methodsofevaluationofmandibleposteriorsegment AT joaosarmentopereiraneto methodsofevaluationofmandibleposteriorsegment AT mariabeatrizborgesaraujo methodsofevaluationofmandibleposteriorsegment AT stenyowanderleytavares methodsofevaluationofmandibleposteriorsegment AT fabiolourencoromano methodsofevaluationofmandibleposteriorsegment |