Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment

The aim of this research was to compare three methods to evaluate the availability of existent space in the mandible posterior segment; the methods are the Merrifield’s (1986), Ricketts’ (1976) and Richardson’s (1992). Sixty 60 teleradiographs in lateral pattern, from head, belonging to 60 Brazilian...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haroldo Amorin Almeida, Maria Helena Castro Almeida, João Sarmento Pereira-Neto, Maria Beatriz Borges Araújo, Stenyo Wanderley Tavares, Fábio Lourenço Romano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2015-11-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641747
_version_ 1818740110264369152
author Haroldo Amorin Almeida
Maria Helena Castro Almeida
João Sarmento Pereira-Neto
Maria Beatriz Borges Araújo
Stenyo Wanderley Tavares
Fábio Lourenço Romano
author_facet Haroldo Amorin Almeida
Maria Helena Castro Almeida
João Sarmento Pereira-Neto
Maria Beatriz Borges Araújo
Stenyo Wanderley Tavares
Fábio Lourenço Romano
author_sort Haroldo Amorin Almeida
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this research was to compare three methods to evaluate the availability of existent space in the mandible posterior segment; the methods are the Merrifield’s (1986), Ricketts’ (1976) and Richardson’s (1992). Sixty 60 teleradiographs in lateral pattern, from head, belonging to 60 Brazilian leucoderm subjects were evaluated. The age range from 9 to 19 years, all having a mal-occlusion of Class II, division 1, equally separated as for the gender (being 30 of male gender and 30 of female gender). It was concluded: Evidence of growing in the mandible arch posterior segment in the age range studied, with mean values of 10,21 mm for the Merrifield, 11,21 mm for the Richardson and 17,84 mm for the Ricketts methods. We have concluded that irrespective of the evaluated method, it was verified that the female gender has a more precocious growing (12,17 mm) as compared to the male gender (8,81 mm), in the ages 9 to 12. In the correlation between the employed methods, there was no a statistical difference among themselves by the t test, in the level of 1% (p £ 0,01).
first_indexed 2024-12-18T01:35:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b8deb81f35204b1596877dc5c1ea4193
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1677-3225
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T01:35:31Z
publishDate 2015-11-01
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
spelling doaj.art-b8deb81f35204b1596877dc5c1ea41932022-12-21T21:25:29ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252015-11-013910.20396/bjos.v3i9.8641747Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segmentHaroldo Amorin Almeida0Maria Helena Castro Almeida1João Sarmento Pereira-Neto2Maria Beatriz Borges Araújo3Stenyo Wanderley Tavares4Fábio Lourenço Romano5Department of Orthodontics, University of CampinasDepartment of Orthodontics, University of CampinasDepartment of Orthodontics, University of CampinasDepartment of Orthodontics, University of CampinasDepartment of Orthodontics, University of CampinasDepartment of Orthodontics, University of CampinasThe aim of this research was to compare three methods to evaluate the availability of existent space in the mandible posterior segment; the methods are the Merrifield’s (1986), Ricketts’ (1976) and Richardson’s (1992). Sixty 60 teleradiographs in lateral pattern, from head, belonging to 60 Brazilian leucoderm subjects were evaluated. The age range from 9 to 19 years, all having a mal-occlusion of Class II, division 1, equally separated as for the gender (being 30 of male gender and 30 of female gender). It was concluded: Evidence of growing in the mandible arch posterior segment in the age range studied, with mean values of 10,21 mm for the Merrifield, 11,21 mm for the Richardson and 17,84 mm for the Ricketts methods. We have concluded that irrespective of the evaluated method, it was verified that the female gender has a more precocious growing (12,17 mm) as compared to the male gender (8,81 mm), in the ages 9 to 12. In the correlation between the employed methods, there was no a statistical difference among themselves by the t test, in the level of 1% (p £ 0,01).https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641747Orthodontics. Cephalometric. Diagnostic
spellingShingle Haroldo Amorin Almeida
Maria Helena Castro Almeida
João Sarmento Pereira-Neto
Maria Beatriz Borges Araújo
Stenyo Wanderley Tavares
Fábio Lourenço Romano
Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Orthodontics. Cephalometric. Diagnostic
title Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment
title_full Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment
title_fullStr Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment
title_full_unstemmed Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment
title_short Methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment
title_sort methods of evaluation of mandible posterior segment
topic Orthodontics. Cephalometric. Diagnostic
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641747
work_keys_str_mv AT haroldoamorinalmeida methodsofevaluationofmandibleposteriorsegment
AT mariahelenacastroalmeida methodsofevaluationofmandibleposteriorsegment
AT joaosarmentopereiraneto methodsofevaluationofmandibleposteriorsegment
AT mariabeatrizborgesaraujo methodsofevaluationofmandibleposteriorsegment
AT stenyowanderleytavares methodsofevaluationofmandibleposteriorsegment
AT fabiolourencoromano methodsofevaluationofmandibleposteriorsegment