Assessing the Significance of the Circadian Time of Administration on the Effectiveness and Tolerability of OnabotulinumtoxinA for Chronic Migraine Prophylaxis

We aimed to provide insights on the role of the circadian time of administration in influencing the efficacy and tolerability/safety profile of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) for chronic migraine (CM) prophylaxis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical files of BoNTA-naïve patients with CM who...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emmanouil V. Dermitzakis, Michail Vikelis, George S. Vlachos, Andreas A. Argyriou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:Toxins
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/14/5/296
_version_ 1797495023549284352
author Emmanouil V. Dermitzakis
Michail Vikelis
George S. Vlachos
Andreas A. Argyriou
author_facet Emmanouil V. Dermitzakis
Michail Vikelis
George S. Vlachos
Andreas A. Argyriou
author_sort Emmanouil V. Dermitzakis
collection DOAJ
description We aimed to provide insights on the role of the circadian time of administration in influencing the efficacy and tolerability/safety profile of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) for chronic migraine (CM) prophylaxis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical files of BoNTA-naïve patients with CM who completed three consecutive cycles of treatment, according to the standard PREEMPT paradigm. Participants were classified to those scheduled to be treated in the morning hours from 8:00 to 12:00 (AM) or afternoon hours from 13:00 to 18:00 (PM). We then assessed and compared between groups the changes from baseline (T0—trimester before BoNTA’s first administration) to the period after its third administration (T3) in the following efficacy outcomes: (i) mean number of headache days/month, (ii) mean number of days/month with peak headache intensity of >4/10, (iii) mean number of days/month with consumption of any abortive treatment. Safety–tolerability was also compared between groups. Results: A total of 50 AM and 50 PM-treated patients were evaluated. The within-group analysis in both groups showed a significant decrease in all efficacy variables between T0 and T3. However, the between-group comparisons of all BoNTA-related efficacy outcomes at T3 vs. T0 documented comparable improvements between AM vs. PM-treated patients. Safety/tolerability was also similar between groups. Conclusions: We were not able to identify significant differences between patients treated in the AM vs. PM, so as to demonstrate that the circadian time of administration should be considered before initiating BoNTA in CM patients.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:42:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b8dec0ee59604329a25e9d5450cc8278
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6651
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:42:35Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Toxins
spelling doaj.art-b8dec0ee59604329a25e9d5450cc82782023-11-23T13:22:27ZengMDPI AGToxins2072-66512022-04-0114529610.3390/toxins14050296Assessing the Significance of the Circadian Time of Administration on the Effectiveness and Tolerability of OnabotulinumtoxinA for Chronic Migraine ProphylaxisEmmanouil V. Dermitzakis0Michail Vikelis1George S. Vlachos2Andreas A. Argyriou3Department of Neurology, “Geniki Kliniki” Euromedica, 54645 Thessaloniki, GreeceHeadache Clinic, Mediterraneo Hospital, 16675 Glyfada, GreeceHeadache Clinic, Mediterraneo Hospital, 16675 Glyfada, GreeceNeurology Department of the “Agios Andreas” State General Hospital of Patras, Headache Outpatient Clinic, 26335 Patras, GreeceWe aimed to provide insights on the role of the circadian time of administration in influencing the efficacy and tolerability/safety profile of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) for chronic migraine (CM) prophylaxis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical files of BoNTA-naïve patients with CM who completed three consecutive cycles of treatment, according to the standard PREEMPT paradigm. Participants were classified to those scheduled to be treated in the morning hours from 8:00 to 12:00 (AM) or afternoon hours from 13:00 to 18:00 (PM). We then assessed and compared between groups the changes from baseline (T0—trimester before BoNTA’s first administration) to the period after its third administration (T3) in the following efficacy outcomes: (i) mean number of headache days/month, (ii) mean number of days/month with peak headache intensity of >4/10, (iii) mean number of days/month with consumption of any abortive treatment. Safety–tolerability was also compared between groups. Results: A total of 50 AM and 50 PM-treated patients were evaluated. The within-group analysis in both groups showed a significant decrease in all efficacy variables between T0 and T3. However, the between-group comparisons of all BoNTA-related efficacy outcomes at T3 vs. T0 documented comparable improvements between AM vs. PM-treated patients. Safety/tolerability was also similar between groups. Conclusions: We were not able to identify significant differences between patients treated in the AM vs. PM, so as to demonstrate that the circadian time of administration should be considered before initiating BoNTA in CM patients.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/14/5/296OnabotulinumtoxinAchronic migraineefficacytolerability/safetycircadian time
spellingShingle Emmanouil V. Dermitzakis
Michail Vikelis
George S. Vlachos
Andreas A. Argyriou
Assessing the Significance of the Circadian Time of Administration on the Effectiveness and Tolerability of OnabotulinumtoxinA for Chronic Migraine Prophylaxis
Toxins
OnabotulinumtoxinA
chronic migraine
efficacy
tolerability/safety
circadian time
title Assessing the Significance of the Circadian Time of Administration on the Effectiveness and Tolerability of OnabotulinumtoxinA for Chronic Migraine Prophylaxis
title_full Assessing the Significance of the Circadian Time of Administration on the Effectiveness and Tolerability of OnabotulinumtoxinA for Chronic Migraine Prophylaxis
title_fullStr Assessing the Significance of the Circadian Time of Administration on the Effectiveness and Tolerability of OnabotulinumtoxinA for Chronic Migraine Prophylaxis
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Significance of the Circadian Time of Administration on the Effectiveness and Tolerability of OnabotulinumtoxinA for Chronic Migraine Prophylaxis
title_short Assessing the Significance of the Circadian Time of Administration on the Effectiveness and Tolerability of OnabotulinumtoxinA for Chronic Migraine Prophylaxis
title_sort assessing the significance of the circadian time of administration on the effectiveness and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxina for chronic migraine prophylaxis
topic OnabotulinumtoxinA
chronic migraine
efficacy
tolerability/safety
circadian time
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/14/5/296
work_keys_str_mv AT emmanouilvdermitzakis assessingthesignificanceofthecircadiantimeofadministrationontheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofonabotulinumtoxinaforchronicmigraineprophylaxis
AT michailvikelis assessingthesignificanceofthecircadiantimeofadministrationontheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofonabotulinumtoxinaforchronicmigraineprophylaxis
AT georgesvlachos assessingthesignificanceofthecircadiantimeofadministrationontheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofonabotulinumtoxinaforchronicmigraineprophylaxis
AT andreasaargyriou assessingthesignificanceofthecircadiantimeofadministrationontheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofonabotulinumtoxinaforchronicmigraineprophylaxis