Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium single file instruments on simulated root canals
Introduction: Effective cleaning of the root canal system is the primary objective of rotary instrumentation. For three-dimensional obturation of the root canal system, ideal preparation should have a continuously tapering funnel shape from the orifice to the apex. The study aimed to evaluate the sh...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Saudi Endodontic Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.saudiendodj.com//article.asp?issn=1658-5984;year=2019;volume=9;issue=1;spage=21;epage=26;aulast=Kumar |
_version_ | 1818425209462456320 |
---|---|
author | Arvind Kumar A Sheerin Sarthaj |
author_facet | Arvind Kumar A Sheerin Sarthaj |
author_sort | Arvind Kumar |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction: Effective cleaning of the root canal system is the primary objective of rotary instrumentation. For three-dimensional obturation of the root canal system, ideal preparation should have a continuously tapering funnel shape from the orifice to the apex. The study aimed to evaluate the shaping ability of two rotary and two reciprocating nickel-titanium (NiTi) single-file instruments on simulated root canals using image analysis software.
Materials and Methods: Forty resin blocks with simulated canals of 30° curvature were divided into four experimental groups containing ten samples in each group. The canals were prepared using Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany), WaveOne (Dentsply, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), OneShape (Micro-Mega, Besancon, France), and F360 (Komet, Brasseler, Lemgo, Germany) size 25 NiTi systems using X Smart Plus (Dentsply). Pre- and post-preparation canals were photographed in a standardized manner and were superimposed. The inner and outer walls of canal curvature were evaluated to determine the most significant change using the image analysis software.
Results: The amount of resin removed from the inner walls was less with rotary single-file NiTi systems when compared with reciprocating. Preparation time was less with rotary instruments. No instrument separation was noted. All instrument systems maintained the original canal curvature.
Conclusion: Rotary single-file systems maintained the canal curvature better than reciprocating single-file systems. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-14T14:10:18Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b8e2dea5eb7c4c5198b6b0ecb298564a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2320-1495 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-14T14:10:18Z |
publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Saudi Endodontic Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-b8e2dea5eb7c4c5198b6b0ecb298564a2022-12-21T22:58:19ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSaudi Endodontic Journal2320-14952019-01-0191212610.4103/sej.sej_19_18Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium single file instruments on simulated root canalsArvind KumarA Sheerin SarthajIntroduction: Effective cleaning of the root canal system is the primary objective of rotary instrumentation. For three-dimensional obturation of the root canal system, ideal preparation should have a continuously tapering funnel shape from the orifice to the apex. The study aimed to evaluate the shaping ability of two rotary and two reciprocating nickel-titanium (NiTi) single-file instruments on simulated root canals using image analysis software. Materials and Methods: Forty resin blocks with simulated canals of 30° curvature were divided into four experimental groups containing ten samples in each group. The canals were prepared using Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany), WaveOne (Dentsply, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), OneShape (Micro-Mega, Besancon, France), and F360 (Komet, Brasseler, Lemgo, Germany) size 25 NiTi systems using X Smart Plus (Dentsply). Pre- and post-preparation canals were photographed in a standardized manner and were superimposed. The inner and outer walls of canal curvature were evaluated to determine the most significant change using the image analysis software. Results: The amount of resin removed from the inner walls was less with rotary single-file NiTi systems when compared with reciprocating. Preparation time was less with rotary instruments. No instrument separation was noted. All instrument systems maintained the original canal curvature. Conclusion: Rotary single-file systems maintained the canal curvature better than reciprocating single-file systems.http://www.saudiendodj.com//article.asp?issn=1658-5984;year=2019;volume=9;issue=1;spage=21;epage=26;aulast=KumarCanal transportationReciprocreciprocating motionrotary systemWaveOne |
spellingShingle | Arvind Kumar A Sheerin Sarthaj Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium single file instruments on simulated root canals Saudi Endodontic Journal Canal transportation Reciproc reciprocating motion rotary system WaveOne |
title | Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium single file instruments on simulated root canals |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium single file instruments on simulated root canals |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium single file instruments on simulated root canals |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium single file instruments on simulated root canals |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium single file instruments on simulated root canals |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of shaping ability of rotary and reciprocating nickel titanium single file instruments on simulated root canals |
topic | Canal transportation Reciproc reciprocating motion rotary system WaveOne |
url | http://www.saudiendodj.com//article.asp?issn=1658-5984;year=2019;volume=9;issue=1;spage=21;epage=26;aulast=Kumar |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arvindkumar comparativeevaluationofshapingabilityofrotaryandreciprocatingnickeltitaniumsinglefileinstrumentsonsimulatedrootcanals AT asheerinsarthaj comparativeevaluationofshapingabilityofrotaryandreciprocatingnickeltitaniumsinglefileinstrumentsonsimulatedrootcanals |