The specifics of the structural organization of the metacognitive components of reflexivity
Introduction. Currently, the study of cognitive and metacognitive processes in professional activity is becoming particularly relevant. In terms of solving this strategic task, it is objectively necessary to converge research in two important areas, the psychology of reflection and metacognitivism....
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
ООО "КРЕДО"
2022-03-01
|
| Series: | Российский психологический журнал |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://rpj.ru.com/index.php/rpj/article/view/1193 |
| _version_ | 1797989851975385088 |
|---|---|
| author | Анатолий В. Карпов Александр А. Карпов Анна В. Чемякина |
| author_facet | Анатолий В. Карпов Александр А. Карпов Анна В. Чемякина |
| author_sort | Анатолий В. Карпов |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction. Currently, the study of cognitive and metacognitive processes in professional activity is becoming particularly relevant. In terms of solving this strategic task, it is objectively necessary to converge research in two important areas, the psychology of reflection and metacognitivism. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that it identifies and interprets the basic features and laws, as well as operational means of the structural organization of reflection and explicating its irreducibility to the additive totality of the main metacognitive processes included in it. Methods. The sample (n = 220) consisted of representatives of the main classes of activity – subject-object, subject-subject, and subject-information, as well as students of universities in Yaroslavl and Moscow. Psychodiagnostics was performed using the author's methods of diagnostics of reflexivity (A.V. Karpov, V. V. Ponomareva) and metathinking (A. A. Karpov), as well as a set of methods developed in metacognitivism, the methods of R. Dickson – D. Haltcha (Metamemory in Adult – MIA), the methods of D. Everson for the diagnosis of meta-planning, methods for the diagnosis of motivational metacognitive strategies (MSLQ), etc. Results. It is established that the individual measure of reflexivity is not identical to the value of the metacognitive potential formed by an additive set of basic metacognitive processes and qualities. Consequently, in it, as an integral individual quality, there is an action of specifically systemic patterns and mechanisms of the integrative type proper, generating synergetic effects and leading to the generation of new, specific content for it. Discussion. The results are interpreted from the positions of the main provisions of metacognitivism as well as the basic provisions of the theory of systems and psychology of reflection. In conclusion, it is concluded that the content of reflexivity is incompatible with the additive set of its constituent partial components - metacognitive processes and qualities - which determines the specificity of its psychological status and its uniqueness as an integral mental property. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T08:27:05Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b8e3e9161d194a48822f3ea8fecbe261 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1812-1853 2411-5789 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T08:27:05Z |
| publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
| publisher | ООО "КРЕДО" |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Российский психологический журнал |
| spelling | doaj.art-b8e3e9161d194a48822f3ea8fecbe2612022-12-22T04:34:43ZengООО "КРЕДО"Российский психологический журнал1812-18532411-57892022-03-0119112714210.21702/rpj.2022.1.101347The specifics of the structural organization of the metacognitive components of reflexivityАнатолий В. Карпов0Александр А. Карпов1Анна В. Чемякина2Ярославский государственный университет им. П. Г. ДемидоваЯрославский государственный университет им. П. Г. ДемидоваЯрославский государственный университет им. П. Г. ДемидоваIntroduction. Currently, the study of cognitive and metacognitive processes in professional activity is becoming particularly relevant. In terms of solving this strategic task, it is objectively necessary to converge research in two important areas, the psychology of reflection and metacognitivism. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that it identifies and interprets the basic features and laws, as well as operational means of the structural organization of reflection and explicating its irreducibility to the additive totality of the main metacognitive processes included in it. Methods. The sample (n = 220) consisted of representatives of the main classes of activity – subject-object, subject-subject, and subject-information, as well as students of universities in Yaroslavl and Moscow. Psychodiagnostics was performed using the author's methods of diagnostics of reflexivity (A.V. Karpov, V. V. Ponomareva) and metathinking (A. A. Karpov), as well as a set of methods developed in metacognitivism, the methods of R. Dickson – D. Haltcha (Metamemory in Adult – MIA), the methods of D. Everson for the diagnosis of meta-planning, methods for the diagnosis of motivational metacognitive strategies (MSLQ), etc. Results. It is established that the individual measure of reflexivity is not identical to the value of the metacognitive potential formed by an additive set of basic metacognitive processes and qualities. Consequently, in it, as an integral individual quality, there is an action of specifically systemic patterns and mechanisms of the integrative type proper, generating synergetic effects and leading to the generation of new, specific content for it. Discussion. The results are interpreted from the positions of the main provisions of metacognitivism as well as the basic provisions of the theory of systems and psychology of reflection. In conclusion, it is concluded that the content of reflexivity is incompatible with the additive set of its constituent partial components - metacognitive processes and qualities - which determines the specificity of its psychological status and its uniqueness as an integral mental property.https://rpj.ru.com/index.php/rpj/article/view/1193reflexivitymetacognitive processesmetacognitive qualitiesstructural patternsintegrative mechanismssynergetic effectssuperadditivityreflectionarbitrary regulationcognitive processes |
| spellingShingle | Анатолий В. Карпов Александр А. Карпов Анна В. Чемякина The specifics of the structural organization of the metacognitive components of reflexivity Российский психологический журнал reflexivity metacognitive processes metacognitive qualities structural patterns integrative mechanisms synergetic effects superadditivity reflection arbitrary regulation cognitive processes |
| title | The specifics of the structural organization of the metacognitive components of reflexivity |
| title_full | The specifics of the structural organization of the metacognitive components of reflexivity |
| title_fullStr | The specifics of the structural organization of the metacognitive components of reflexivity |
| title_full_unstemmed | The specifics of the structural organization of the metacognitive components of reflexivity |
| title_short | The specifics of the structural organization of the metacognitive components of reflexivity |
| title_sort | specifics of the structural organization of the metacognitive components of reflexivity |
| topic | reflexivity metacognitive processes metacognitive qualities structural patterns integrative mechanisms synergetic effects superadditivity reflection arbitrary regulation cognitive processes |
| url | https://rpj.ru.com/index.php/rpj/article/view/1193 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT anatolijvkarpov thespecificsofthestructuralorganizationofthemetacognitivecomponentsofreflexivity AT aleksandrakarpov thespecificsofthestructuralorganizationofthemetacognitivecomponentsofreflexivity AT annavčemâkina thespecificsofthestructuralorganizationofthemetacognitivecomponentsofreflexivity AT anatolijvkarpov specificsofthestructuralorganizationofthemetacognitivecomponentsofreflexivity AT aleksandrakarpov specificsofthestructuralorganizationofthemetacognitivecomponentsofreflexivity AT annavčemâkina specificsofthestructuralorganizationofthemetacognitivecomponentsofreflexivity |