Asymmetry and symmetry of acts and omissions in punishment, norms, and judged causality
Harmful acts are punished more often and more harshly than harmful omissions. This asymmetry has variously been ascribed to differences in how individuals perceive the causal responsibility of acts versus omissions and to social norms that tend to proscribe acts more frequently than omissions. This...
Main Authors: | Toby Handfield, John Thrasher, Andrew Corcoran, Shaun Nichols |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/21/210210/jdm210210.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Asymmetry and symmetry of acts and omissions in punishment, norms, and judged causality
by: Toby Handfield, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
The Domain of Bound and Omission in Rhetorical Science
by: Fatemeh jamali
Published: (2011-02-01) -
Linking Safety-Specific Leader Reward and Punishment Omission to Safety Compliance Behavior: The Role of Distributive Justice and Role Ambiguity
by: Lin Liu, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Omission and Imagery in Hemingway’s “Up in Michigan,” Carver’s “Chef’s House,” Ford’s “Rock Springs,” and Mason’s “Residents and Transients”
by: Messaouda Boudjerida
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Wrongful Omission as a Condition for Tort Liabilities
by: Buletsa Sibilla, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)