Asymmetry and symmetry of acts and omissions in punishment, norms, and judged causality
Harmful acts are punished more often and more harshly than harmful omissions. This asymmetry has variously been ascribed to differences in how individuals perceive the causal responsibility of acts versus omissions and to social norms that tend to proscribe acts more frequently than omissions. This...
Main Authors: | Toby Handfield, John Thrasher, Andrew Corcoran, Shaun Nichols |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/21/210210/jdm210210.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Asymmetry and symmetry of acts and omissions in punishment, norms, and judged causality
by: Toby Handfield, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
The Domain of Bound and Omission in Rhetorical Science
by: Fatemeh jamali
Published: (2011-02-01) -
Substantiation of Murder through Act of Omission in Islamic Jurisprudence
by: Salem Afsari
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Linking Safety-Specific Leader Reward and Punishment Omission to Safety Compliance Behavior: The Role of Distributive Justice and Role Ambiguity
by: Lin Liu, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Criminalization of Omissions in Contradiction of Autonomy and Welfare Principles
by: Majid Ghourchi-beigi
Published: (2019-08-01)