On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909)

Hebius sauteri (Boulenger, 1909) has been long recognized as a widely distributed species with three subspecies, namely Hebius sauteri sauteri from Taiwan Island and southeastern China, Hebius sauteri bourreti (Malnate, 1962) from northern Vietnam, and Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) from Sic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mao-Liang Li, Jin-Long Ren, Jun-Jie Huang, Zhi-Tong Lyu, Shuo Qi, Ke Jiang, Ying-Yong Wang, Jia-Tang Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2022-12-01
Series:Herpetozoa
Online Access:https://herpetozoa.pensoft.net/article/94920/download/pdf/
_version_ 1797978512237264896
author Mao-Liang Li
Jin-Long Ren
Jun-Jie Huang
Zhi-Tong Lyu
Shuo Qi
Ke Jiang
Ying-Yong Wang
Jia-Tang Li
author_facet Mao-Liang Li
Jin-Long Ren
Jun-Jie Huang
Zhi-Tong Lyu
Shuo Qi
Ke Jiang
Ying-Yong Wang
Jia-Tang Li
author_sort Mao-Liang Li
collection DOAJ
description Hebius sauteri (Boulenger, 1909) has been long recognized as a widely distributed species with three subspecies, namely Hebius sauteri sauteri from Taiwan Island and southeastern China, Hebius sauteri bourreti (Malnate, 1962) from northern Vietnam, and Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) from Sichuan, southwestern China. However, the validity of these subspecies of the H. sauteri complex has not been evaluated. In the current study, we re-evaluate the taxonomic status of H. s. maximus based on morphological and molecular evidence. Molecular phylogenetic results indicate that H. s. maximus is a distantly diverged clade with respect to H. s. sauteri, and that H. s. maximus is morphologically distinguishable from the nominative subspecies. Therefore, our results support the validity of H. s. maximus and we elevate it to full species status, namely Hebius maximus comb. nov. The distribution range of H. sauteri is revised according to our proposed taxonomic change. Furthermore, detailed redescription, natural history, and coloration of both H. sauteri and H. maximus and comments on the validity of H. s. bourreti are also provided.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T05:25:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b8fbe4f4dd51485a91223491f4d26efa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2682-955X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T05:25:13Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format Article
series Herpetozoa
spelling doaj.art-b8fbe4f4dd51485a91223491f4d26efa2022-12-23T09:54:05ZengPensoft PublishersHerpetozoa2682-955X2022-12-013526528210.3897/herpetozoa.35.e9492094920On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909)Mao-Liang Li0Jin-Long Ren1Jun-Jie Huang2Zhi-Tong Lyu3Shuo Qi4Ke Jiang5Ying-Yong Wang6Jia-Tang Li7Huazhong Agricultural UniversityChengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesChengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesSun Yat-Sen UniversitySun Yat-Sen UniversityChengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesSun Yat-Sen UniversitySoutheast Asia Biodiversity Research Institute, Chinese Academy of SciencesHebius sauteri (Boulenger, 1909) has been long recognized as a widely distributed species with three subspecies, namely Hebius sauteri sauteri from Taiwan Island and southeastern China, Hebius sauteri bourreti (Malnate, 1962) from northern Vietnam, and Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) from Sichuan, southwestern China. However, the validity of these subspecies of the H. sauteri complex has not been evaluated. In the current study, we re-evaluate the taxonomic status of H. s. maximus based on morphological and molecular evidence. Molecular phylogenetic results indicate that H. s. maximus is a distantly diverged clade with respect to H. s. sauteri, and that H. s. maximus is morphologically distinguishable from the nominative subspecies. Therefore, our results support the validity of H. s. maximus and we elevate it to full species status, namely Hebius maximus comb. nov. The distribution range of H. sauteri is revised according to our proposed taxonomic change. Furthermore, detailed redescription, natural history, and coloration of both H. sauteri and H. maximus and comments on the validity of H. s. bourreti are also provided.https://herpetozoa.pensoft.net/article/94920/download/pdf/
spellingShingle Mao-Liang Li
Jin-Long Ren
Jun-Jie Huang
Zhi-Tong Lyu
Shuo Qi
Ke Jiang
Ying-Yong Wang
Jia-Tang Li
On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909)
Herpetozoa
title On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909)
title_full On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909)
title_fullStr On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909)
title_full_unstemmed On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909)
title_short On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909)
title_sort on the validity of hebius sauteri maximus malnate 1962 squamata natricidae with the redescription of h maximus comb nov and h sauteri boulenger 1909
url https://herpetozoa.pensoft.net/article/94920/download/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT maoliangli onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909
AT jinlongren onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909
AT junjiehuang onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909
AT zhitonglyu onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909
AT shuoqi onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909
AT kejiang onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909
AT yingyongwang onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909
AT jiatangli onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909