On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909)
Hebius sauteri (Boulenger, 1909) has been long recognized as a widely distributed species with three subspecies, namely Hebius sauteri sauteri from Taiwan Island and southeastern China, Hebius sauteri bourreti (Malnate, 1962) from northern Vietnam, and Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) from Sic...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Pensoft Publishers
2022-12-01
|
Series: | Herpetozoa |
Online Access: | https://herpetozoa.pensoft.net/article/94920/download/pdf/ |
_version_ | 1797978512237264896 |
---|---|
author | Mao-Liang Li Jin-Long Ren Jun-Jie Huang Zhi-Tong Lyu Shuo Qi Ke Jiang Ying-Yong Wang Jia-Tang Li |
author_facet | Mao-Liang Li Jin-Long Ren Jun-Jie Huang Zhi-Tong Lyu Shuo Qi Ke Jiang Ying-Yong Wang Jia-Tang Li |
author_sort | Mao-Liang Li |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Hebius sauteri (Boulenger, 1909) has been long recognized as a widely distributed species with three subspecies, namely Hebius sauteri sauteri from Taiwan Island and southeastern China, Hebius sauteri bourreti (Malnate, 1962) from northern Vietnam, and Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) from Sichuan, southwestern China. However, the validity of these subspecies of the H. sauteri complex has not been evaluated. In the current study, we re-evaluate the taxonomic status of H. s. maximus based on morphological and molecular evidence. Molecular phylogenetic results indicate that H. s. maximus is a distantly diverged clade with respect to H. s. sauteri, and that H. s. maximus is morphologically distinguishable from the nominative subspecies. Therefore, our results support the validity of H. s. maximus and we elevate it to full species status, namely Hebius maximus comb. nov. The distribution range of H. sauteri is revised according to our proposed taxonomic change. Furthermore, detailed redescription, natural history, and coloration of both H. sauteri and H. maximus and comments on the validity of H. s. bourreti are also provided. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T05:25:13Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b8fbe4f4dd51485a91223491f4d26efa |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2682-955X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T05:25:13Z |
publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
publisher | Pensoft Publishers |
record_format | Article |
series | Herpetozoa |
spelling | doaj.art-b8fbe4f4dd51485a91223491f4d26efa2022-12-23T09:54:05ZengPensoft PublishersHerpetozoa2682-955X2022-12-013526528210.3897/herpetozoa.35.e9492094920On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909)Mao-Liang Li0Jin-Long Ren1Jun-Jie Huang2Zhi-Tong Lyu3Shuo Qi4Ke Jiang5Ying-Yong Wang6Jia-Tang Li7Huazhong Agricultural UniversityChengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesChengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesSun Yat-Sen UniversitySun Yat-Sen UniversityChengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesSun Yat-Sen UniversitySoutheast Asia Biodiversity Research Institute, Chinese Academy of SciencesHebius sauteri (Boulenger, 1909) has been long recognized as a widely distributed species with three subspecies, namely Hebius sauteri sauteri from Taiwan Island and southeastern China, Hebius sauteri bourreti (Malnate, 1962) from northern Vietnam, and Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) from Sichuan, southwestern China. However, the validity of these subspecies of the H. sauteri complex has not been evaluated. In the current study, we re-evaluate the taxonomic status of H. s. maximus based on morphological and molecular evidence. Molecular phylogenetic results indicate that H. s. maximus is a distantly diverged clade with respect to H. s. sauteri, and that H. s. maximus is morphologically distinguishable from the nominative subspecies. Therefore, our results support the validity of H. s. maximus and we elevate it to full species status, namely Hebius maximus comb. nov. The distribution range of H. sauteri is revised according to our proposed taxonomic change. Furthermore, detailed redescription, natural history, and coloration of both H. sauteri and H. maximus and comments on the validity of H. s. bourreti are also provided.https://herpetozoa.pensoft.net/article/94920/download/pdf/ |
spellingShingle | Mao-Liang Li Jin-Long Ren Jun-Jie Huang Zhi-Tong Lyu Shuo Qi Ke Jiang Ying-Yong Wang Jia-Tang Li On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909) Herpetozoa |
title | On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909) |
title_full | On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909) |
title_fullStr | On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909) |
title_full_unstemmed | On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909) |
title_short | On the validity of Hebius sauteri maximus (Malnate, 1962) (Squamata, Natricidae), with the redescription of H. maximus comb. nov. and H. sauteri (Boulenger, 1909) |
title_sort | on the validity of hebius sauteri maximus malnate 1962 squamata natricidae with the redescription of h maximus comb nov and h sauteri boulenger 1909 |
url | https://herpetozoa.pensoft.net/article/94920/download/pdf/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maoliangli onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909 AT jinlongren onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909 AT junjiehuang onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909 AT zhitonglyu onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909 AT shuoqi onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909 AT kejiang onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909 AT yingyongwang onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909 AT jiatangli onthevalidityofhebiussauterimaximusmalnate1962squamatanatricidaewiththeredescriptionofhmaximuscombnovandhsauteriboulenger1909 |