Matching visual and acoustic events to estimate detection probability for small cetaceans in the ACCOBAMS Survey Initiative

Estimating the detection probability of small cetaceans using either visual or acoustic surveys is difficult because they do not surface or vocalise continuously and can be imperceptible to an observer or hydrophone. Animals seen at the surface may have lower vocalisation rates, while submerged indi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Camille Ollier, Ilona Sinn, Oliver Boisseau, Vincent Ridoux, Auriane Virgili
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1244474/full
_version_ 1827793296504651776
author Camille Ollier
Camille Ollier
Ilona Sinn
Oliver Boisseau
Vincent Ridoux
Vincent Ridoux
Auriane Virgili
author_facet Camille Ollier
Camille Ollier
Ilona Sinn
Oliver Boisseau
Vincent Ridoux
Vincent Ridoux
Auriane Virgili
author_sort Camille Ollier
collection DOAJ
description Estimating the detection probability of small cetaceans using either visual or acoustic surveys is difficult because they do not surface or vocalise continuously and can be imperceptible to an observer or hydrophone. Animals seen at the surface may have lower vocalisation rates, while submerged individuals may be more vocally active. This study aims to estimate visual, acoustic and combined detection probability by using Mark-Recapture Distance Sampling (MRDS) methodology. We used vessel-based visual sightings and acoustic data (based on click identification) collected simultaneously during the ACCOBAMS Survey Initiative in summer 2018 onboard the R/V Song of the Whale. This study focused on small cetaceans in the Mediterranean Sea, including the most commonly-encountered species, the striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba). We identified duplicate events between visual and acoustic platforms using a decision tree based on time and distance thresholds to estimate g(0) (the detection probability on the trackline) for small cetaceans. A total of 30 duplicate events were identified from 107 and 109 events identified by the visual and acoustic platforms respectively. We tested the models with two key functions. With a hazard-rate key function, the g(0) was estimated at 0.52 (CV=21.0%) for both platforms combined, 0.29 (CV=25.6%) for the visual platform and 0.32 (CV=25.1%) for the acoustic platform. With a half-normal key function, g(0) was estimated at 0.51 (CV = 21.7%) for both platforms combined, 0.29 (CV = 25.6%) for the visual platform and 0.33 (CV = 23.2%) for the acoustic platform. Our results illustrate that passive acoustic monitoring can be used as an independent platform in MRDS to estimate the detection probability. Our estimate of g(0) was well below 1, far from the perfect detection commonly assumed for abundance estimation. Without correction for detection biases, total abundance would be underestimated by a factor of two when using both acoustic and visual data. This highlights the importance of using dual-platform surveys to estimate detection probability in order to improve abundance estimates and conservation efforts.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T18:15:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b91b2b172ec54b80b533203c085253a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-7745
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T18:15:27Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Marine Science
spelling doaj.art-b91b2b172ec54b80b533203c085253a62023-10-16T08:53:43ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452023-10-011010.3389/fmars.2023.12444741244474Matching visual and acoustic events to estimate detection probability for small cetaceans in the ACCOBAMS Survey InitiativeCamille Ollier0Camille Ollier1Ilona Sinn2Oliver Boisseau3Vincent Ridoux4Vincent Ridoux5Auriane Virgili6Centre d’Etude Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372 CNRS, La Rochelle Université, Chizé, FranceObservatoire PELAGIS, UAR 3462 CNRS, La Rochelle Université, La Rochelle, FranceObservatoire PELAGIS, UAR 3462 CNRS, La Rochelle Université, La Rochelle, FranceMarine Conservation Research, Kelvedon, United KingdomCentre d’Etude Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372 CNRS, La Rochelle Université, Chizé, FranceObservatoire PELAGIS, UAR 3462 CNRS, La Rochelle Université, La Rochelle, FranceObservatoire PELAGIS, UAR 3462 CNRS, La Rochelle Université, La Rochelle, FranceEstimating the detection probability of small cetaceans using either visual or acoustic surveys is difficult because they do not surface or vocalise continuously and can be imperceptible to an observer or hydrophone. Animals seen at the surface may have lower vocalisation rates, while submerged individuals may be more vocally active. This study aims to estimate visual, acoustic and combined detection probability by using Mark-Recapture Distance Sampling (MRDS) methodology. We used vessel-based visual sightings and acoustic data (based on click identification) collected simultaneously during the ACCOBAMS Survey Initiative in summer 2018 onboard the R/V Song of the Whale. This study focused on small cetaceans in the Mediterranean Sea, including the most commonly-encountered species, the striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba). We identified duplicate events between visual and acoustic platforms using a decision tree based on time and distance thresholds to estimate g(0) (the detection probability on the trackline) for small cetaceans. A total of 30 duplicate events were identified from 107 and 109 events identified by the visual and acoustic platforms respectively. We tested the models with two key functions. With a hazard-rate key function, the g(0) was estimated at 0.52 (CV=21.0%) for both platforms combined, 0.29 (CV=25.6%) for the visual platform and 0.32 (CV=25.1%) for the acoustic platform. With a half-normal key function, g(0) was estimated at 0.51 (CV = 21.7%) for both platforms combined, 0.29 (CV = 25.6%) for the visual platform and 0.33 (CV = 23.2%) for the acoustic platform. Our results illustrate that passive acoustic monitoring can be used as an independent platform in MRDS to estimate the detection probability. Our estimate of g(0) was well below 1, far from the perfect detection commonly assumed for abundance estimation. Without correction for detection biases, total abundance would be underestimated by a factor of two when using both acoustic and visual data. This highlights the importance of using dual-platform surveys to estimate detection probability in order to improve abundance estimates and conservation efforts.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1244474/fulldetection probabilityduplicate eventsmark-recapture distance samplingdual platformpassive acoustic monitoringline-transect surveys
spellingShingle Camille Ollier
Camille Ollier
Ilona Sinn
Oliver Boisseau
Vincent Ridoux
Vincent Ridoux
Auriane Virgili
Matching visual and acoustic events to estimate detection probability for small cetaceans in the ACCOBAMS Survey Initiative
Frontiers in Marine Science
detection probability
duplicate events
mark-recapture distance sampling
dual platform
passive acoustic monitoring
line-transect surveys
title Matching visual and acoustic events to estimate detection probability for small cetaceans in the ACCOBAMS Survey Initiative
title_full Matching visual and acoustic events to estimate detection probability for small cetaceans in the ACCOBAMS Survey Initiative
title_fullStr Matching visual and acoustic events to estimate detection probability for small cetaceans in the ACCOBAMS Survey Initiative
title_full_unstemmed Matching visual and acoustic events to estimate detection probability for small cetaceans in the ACCOBAMS Survey Initiative
title_short Matching visual and acoustic events to estimate detection probability for small cetaceans in the ACCOBAMS Survey Initiative
title_sort matching visual and acoustic events to estimate detection probability for small cetaceans in the accobams survey initiative
topic detection probability
duplicate events
mark-recapture distance sampling
dual platform
passive acoustic monitoring
line-transect surveys
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1244474/full
work_keys_str_mv AT camilleollier matchingvisualandacousticeventstoestimatedetectionprobabilityforsmallcetaceansintheaccobamssurveyinitiative
AT camilleollier matchingvisualandacousticeventstoestimatedetectionprobabilityforsmallcetaceansintheaccobamssurveyinitiative
AT ilonasinn matchingvisualandacousticeventstoestimatedetectionprobabilityforsmallcetaceansintheaccobamssurveyinitiative
AT oliverboisseau matchingvisualandacousticeventstoestimatedetectionprobabilityforsmallcetaceansintheaccobamssurveyinitiative
AT vincentridoux matchingvisualandacousticeventstoestimatedetectionprobabilityforsmallcetaceansintheaccobamssurveyinitiative
AT vincentridoux matchingvisualandacousticeventstoestimatedetectionprobabilityforsmallcetaceansintheaccobamssurveyinitiative
AT aurianevirgili matchingvisualandacousticeventstoestimatedetectionprobabilityforsmallcetaceansintheaccobamssurveyinitiative