Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks
Recycling of industrial wastes like fly ash into construction materials is attaining more momentum nowadays towards enhancing the characteristics and performance of materials in terms of strength and durability. This article attempts to present the effect of fly ash inclusion on the properties of br...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
2022-11-01
|
Series: | Magazine of Civil Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://engstroy.spbstu.ru/article/2022.115.02/ |
_version_ | 1811186835338035200 |
---|---|
author | Dash Subhakanta Panda Laxmidhar Mohanty Itishree Gupta Piyush |
author_facet | Dash Subhakanta Panda Laxmidhar Mohanty Itishree Gupta Piyush |
author_sort | Dash Subhakanta |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Recycling of industrial wastes like fly ash into construction materials is attaining more momentum nowadays towards enhancing the characteristics and performance of materials in terms of strength and durability. This article attempts to present the effect of fly ash inclusion on the properties of bricks through a comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks (FB), clay bricks (CB), and fly ash incorporated clay bricks (FC). For experimentation, twelve brick specimens were made using fly ash, clay, lime, gypsum, sand, and water in different proportions followed by sun-drying and firing methods. Sieve analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning electron microscope (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), compressive strength, and efflorescence tests were performed to study the properties of brick specimens. Various factors such as the effect of drying, heating temperature, and percentage of ash addition on the bricks were also observed. The laboratory results indicated that out of the above-mentioned three bricks, FB showed better performance than CB and FC. The compressive strength and water absorption values for FB were found in the range of 8.50–12.18 MPa and 10.84–13.11 %, respectively. Thus, based on the experimental observations and results, the mix design FB-3 (25 % fly ash, 20 % lime, 2 % gypsum, 53 % sand) exhibited the optimum compressive strength of 10.25 MPa with a water absorption value of 11.16 %. This mix design can be recommended as a substitute for conventional bricks against aggressive environment contributing immensely towards solid waste management and sustainable development. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T13:51:47Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b9325084b85c4c55889b8a707703ff45 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2712-8172 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T13:51:47Z |
publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
publisher | Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University |
record_format | Article |
series | Magazine of Civil Engineering |
spelling | doaj.art-b9325084b85c4c55889b8a707703ff452022-12-22T04:20:33ZengPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic UniversityMagazine of Civil Engineering2712-81722022-11-011150710.34910/MCE.115.220714726Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricksDash Subhakanta0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4487-4530Panda Laxmidhar1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4678-0650Mohanty Itishree2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9610-0601Gupta Piyush3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7612-6916Synergy Institute of Engineering and TechnologyKIIT Deemed to be UniversitySynergy Institute of Engineering and TechnologySRM Institute of Science and Technology, Delhi-NCR CampusRecycling of industrial wastes like fly ash into construction materials is attaining more momentum nowadays towards enhancing the characteristics and performance of materials in terms of strength and durability. This article attempts to present the effect of fly ash inclusion on the properties of bricks through a comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks (FB), clay bricks (CB), and fly ash incorporated clay bricks (FC). For experimentation, twelve brick specimens were made using fly ash, clay, lime, gypsum, sand, and water in different proportions followed by sun-drying and firing methods. Sieve analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning electron microscope (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), compressive strength, and efflorescence tests were performed to study the properties of brick specimens. Various factors such as the effect of drying, heating temperature, and percentage of ash addition on the bricks were also observed. The laboratory results indicated that out of the above-mentioned three bricks, FB showed better performance than CB and FC. The compressive strength and water absorption values for FB were found in the range of 8.50–12.18 MPa and 10.84–13.11 %, respectively. Thus, based on the experimental observations and results, the mix design FB-3 (25 % fly ash, 20 % lime, 2 % gypsum, 53 % sand) exhibited the optimum compressive strength of 10.25 MPa with a water absorption value of 11.16 %. This mix design can be recommended as a substitute for conventional bricks against aggressive environment contributing immensely towards solid waste management and sustainable development.http://engstroy.spbstu.ru/article/2022.115.02/fly ashfly ash bricksclay bricksfly ash incorporated clay brickscompressive strengthwater absorption |
spellingShingle | Dash Subhakanta Panda Laxmidhar Mohanty Itishree Gupta Piyush Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks Magazine of Civil Engineering fly ash fly ash bricks clay bricks fly ash incorporated clay bricks compressive strength water absorption |
title | Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks |
title_full | Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks |
title_fullStr | Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks |
title_short | Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks |
title_sort | comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks |
topic | fly ash fly ash bricks clay bricks fly ash incorporated clay bricks compressive strength water absorption |
url | http://engstroy.spbstu.ru/article/2022.115.02/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dashsubhakanta comparativefeasibilityanalysisofflyashbricksclaybricksandflyashincorporatedclaybricks AT pandalaxmidhar comparativefeasibilityanalysisofflyashbricksclaybricksandflyashincorporatedclaybricks AT mohantyitishree comparativefeasibilityanalysisofflyashbricksclaybricksandflyashincorporatedclaybricks AT guptapiyush comparativefeasibilityanalysisofflyashbricksclaybricksandflyashincorporatedclaybricks |