Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks

Recycling of industrial wastes like fly ash into construction materials is attaining more momentum nowadays towards enhancing the characteristics and performance of materials in terms of strength and durability. This article attempts to present the effect of fly ash inclusion on the properties of br...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dash Subhakanta, Panda Laxmidhar, Mohanty Itishree, Gupta Piyush
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University 2022-11-01
Series:Magazine of Civil Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://engstroy.spbstu.ru/article/2022.115.02/
_version_ 1811186835338035200
author Dash Subhakanta
Panda Laxmidhar
Mohanty Itishree
Gupta Piyush
author_facet Dash Subhakanta
Panda Laxmidhar
Mohanty Itishree
Gupta Piyush
author_sort Dash Subhakanta
collection DOAJ
description Recycling of industrial wastes like fly ash into construction materials is attaining more momentum nowadays towards enhancing the characteristics and performance of materials in terms of strength and durability. This article attempts to present the effect of fly ash inclusion on the properties of bricks through a comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks (FB), clay bricks (CB), and fly ash incorporated clay bricks (FC). For experimentation, twelve brick specimens were made using fly ash, clay, lime, gypsum, sand, and water in different proportions followed by sun-drying and firing methods. Sieve analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning electron microscope (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), compressive strength, and efflorescence tests were performed to study the properties of brick specimens. Various factors such as the effect of drying, heating temperature, and percentage of ash addition on the bricks were also observed. The laboratory results indicated that out of the above-mentioned three bricks, FB showed better performance than CB and FC. The compressive strength and water absorption values for FB were found in the range of 8.50–12.18 MPa and 10.84–13.11 %, respectively. Thus, based on the experimental observations and results, the mix design FB-3 (25 % fly ash, 20 % lime, 2 % gypsum, 53 % sand) exhibited the optimum compressive strength of 10.25 MPa with a water absorption value of 11.16 %. This mix design can be recommended as a substitute for conventional bricks against aggressive environment contributing immensely towards solid waste management and sustainable development.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T13:51:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b9325084b85c4c55889b8a707703ff45
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2712-8172
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T13:51:47Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
record_format Article
series Magazine of Civil Engineering
spelling doaj.art-b9325084b85c4c55889b8a707703ff452022-12-22T04:20:33ZengPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic UniversityMagazine of Civil Engineering2712-81722022-11-011150710.34910/MCE.115.220714726Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricksDash Subhakanta0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4487-4530Panda Laxmidhar1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4678-0650Mohanty Itishree2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9610-0601Gupta Piyush3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7612-6916Synergy Institute of Engineering and TechnologyKIIT Deemed to be UniversitySynergy Institute of Engineering and TechnologySRM Institute of Science and Technology, Delhi-NCR CampusRecycling of industrial wastes like fly ash into construction materials is attaining more momentum nowadays towards enhancing the characteristics and performance of materials in terms of strength and durability. This article attempts to present the effect of fly ash inclusion on the properties of bricks through a comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks (FB), clay bricks (CB), and fly ash incorporated clay bricks (FC). For experimentation, twelve brick specimens were made using fly ash, clay, lime, gypsum, sand, and water in different proportions followed by sun-drying and firing methods. Sieve analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning electron microscope (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), compressive strength, and efflorescence tests were performed to study the properties of brick specimens. Various factors such as the effect of drying, heating temperature, and percentage of ash addition on the bricks were also observed. The laboratory results indicated that out of the above-mentioned three bricks, FB showed better performance than CB and FC. The compressive strength and water absorption values for FB were found in the range of 8.50–12.18 MPa and 10.84–13.11 %, respectively. Thus, based on the experimental observations and results, the mix design FB-3 (25 % fly ash, 20 % lime, 2 % gypsum, 53 % sand) exhibited the optimum compressive strength of 10.25 MPa with a water absorption value of 11.16 %. This mix design can be recommended as a substitute for conventional bricks against aggressive environment contributing immensely towards solid waste management and sustainable development.http://engstroy.spbstu.ru/article/2022.115.02/fly ashfly ash bricksclay bricksfly ash incorporated clay brickscompressive strengthwater absorption
spellingShingle Dash Subhakanta
Panda Laxmidhar
Mohanty Itishree
Gupta Piyush
Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks
Magazine of Civil Engineering
fly ash
fly ash bricks
clay bricks
fly ash incorporated clay bricks
compressive strength
water absorption
title Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks
title_full Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks
title_fullStr Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks
title_full_unstemmed Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks
title_short Comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks, clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks
title_sort comparative feasibility analysis of fly ash bricks clay bricks and fly ash incorporated clay bricks
topic fly ash
fly ash bricks
clay bricks
fly ash incorporated clay bricks
compressive strength
water absorption
url http://engstroy.spbstu.ru/article/2022.115.02/
work_keys_str_mv AT dashsubhakanta comparativefeasibilityanalysisofflyashbricksclaybricksandflyashincorporatedclaybricks
AT pandalaxmidhar comparativefeasibilityanalysisofflyashbricksclaybricksandflyashincorporatedclaybricks
AT mohantyitishree comparativefeasibilityanalysisofflyashbricksclaybricksandflyashincorporatedclaybricks
AT guptapiyush comparativefeasibilityanalysisofflyashbricksclaybricksandflyashincorporatedclaybricks